Philtration said:Obi1 said:Philtration said:rabidgopher04 said:It's funny how you guys are being so ******* the Bears fans when the real rivalry of the last 8 years has been the Vikings and the Packers. The Bears have hardly been relevant for quite some time.
Actually the Tampa Bay Buccaneers were more competitive than the Vikings the last 5 years that they played in our division. You are getting emotional over the last 3 seasons (when the Vikings never even won 10 games in a season) and let Randy Moss blur your vision.
Here are the W-L records for the last 5 years including Tampa's last 5 seasons in the division. If the Bears are as irrelevant as you say then what makes the Vikings so special in your eyes? I don’t see a big difference in the Bears-Vikings records.
G.B. 51-27
T.B. 48-32
MIN. 37-43
CHI. 34-46
DET. 25-55
Here are the W-L records for the division from 1984 to 1992 before the Bears went into hibernation.
CHI. 95-35
MIN. 65-86
G.B. 57-85
DET. 53-88
T.B. 39-104
The Vikings were the Bears closest competitors but their biggest rival? Hardly!
How about from 1977 to 2001 when Tampa Bay played in the Central division?
CHI. 207-170
MIN. 204-193
G.B. 195-195
DET. 168-223
T.B. 151-238
That’s a 25-year span and again the Vikings were the Bears closest competitors but they have never been the Bears biggest rivals.
:stop:
Phillie,
Which BEARS statistics site did you get this from?
How nice of YOU/THEM to omit 20 losses to boost their record for the 25 seasons.
No wonder some people on this site think you are a *******.
Okay turd burglar. Since you did not like the numbers that I got from NFL.com I went to the Bears official site. They list the Bears record from 1977 to 2001 as 209-181 so at what site did you find these imaginary 20 loses? Let me guess.....www. obi1idiot.com right? :crazy:
Actually, It is called MATH.
Add up the total number of games each team has played and then add the Bears totals...
I can see that your addition is wrong.
I blame the school system for your ineptness...