wow great defensive come back for your former player there bud.....your (former) guy is a veteran, ours was a rookie who didn't get much play time, then used more his 2nd year, but still not as much due to other key players taking snaps. Your (former) guy was a full time starter who just happen to have menapausal headaches......tells me a lot about him. No, I didn't cherry pick stats, they are what they are, deal with it.
Sorry, you don't get off that easy. You used game starts to determine if Harvin had durability issues, then when I point out the same on a Packer player you make the claim that he was a rookie. Well, Harvin was as rookie his first year and only started 8 games but played in 15. Yet you didn't take that into consideration. So lets take a look at Harvin's durability issues.
2009: Started 8 game played in 15. 60 receptions. Yup not very durable there.
2010: Started 13 games played in 14. 71 receptions. Man he sucked that year. Headaches must have been tough.
2011: Started 11 played in 16. 87 receptions. Must be something about those headaches. Wait, they were gone.
2012: Started 8 played in 9. 62 catches in 9 games.
So let's add this up. Over 4 years 64 games he started only 43, but to you that means he has durability issues. Yet over 64 games he played in 54. Missing 7 last year alone. So the previous three years he missed 3 games. Yup, he's not very durable. So over those 54 games he caught an average of 5.2 catches per game. Yup, not very durable.
In the last 4 years Jordy Nelson has only started 23 out of 64. Not very durable.
In the last 4 years James Jones has only started 21 out of 64. Not very durable.
Using game starts to determine durability issues is cherry picking to make a point. But if you want to use that stat for that reason, I would say the Packer have durability issues at the WR position.
BTW, I'll defend any player when people start making up crap about them using crap statistics to make their point.
And one more thing. Harvin wasn't a starter in 2009.