So you are arguing... if McCluster is there and we already have Westbrook... TT will still take him... otherwise it had nothing to do with Westbrook?
I'm not arguing that TT WILL or WILL NOT pick him.
But that due to Westbrook being in his last legs, he's not going to dictate who TT selects.
If we had picked Sproles, or even a less-used guy in Taylor, then it would be different.
The way I think TT looks at the 3rd back position is this:
He may think that we're set with Brandon Jackson. If so, then he's not going to pick McCluster. This is the most important thing in dictating wheter we pick him or not.
Now, considering he doesn't.
If we don't have Westbrook, then we have a hole in there. If he believes McCluster is the guy to solve it, he picks him. He won't pick him because he feels pressed by this hole, though. The hole only permits him to pick.
But even if we do have Westbrook, he'd be only good for one, two years. TT allways drafts thinking about future needs. So the future hole is still there. He'd still pick McCluster if he though he would be the future 3rd down back of the Packers.
And remember, McCluster would still be our KR. He could still be picked for that reason, which Westbrook doesn't do...
Made myself more clear now? Can't explain how I think TT acts better...