neilfii
Hall of Fame Fan
A little "hardware envy" perhaps? Some of the results do make the list rather "suspect."
A little "hardware envy" perhaps? Some of the results do make the list rather "suspect."
And where will Aaron Rodgers land?
I really thought Woodson or Williams would be in the top 100 players of 2011 but I really don't think either one will be in the top 20. Disappointing. But maybe someone thinks otherwise.
But what about Rodgers? Where will he land? I'd say Brady will be no. 1 and Rodgers no. 2. Any agree?
What about Matthews? I know he'll be in the top 20.
And I believe Charles Woodson is the top ranked.Packers had 7 players, most of any team..
Matthews is between 20 and 11, because there's his promo for the next episode, he's introduced by Kevin Greene (they talk about an elite pass rusher and then there's Greene talking. I take he's not talking about Ware...)Clifton, Collins, B.J., Jennings, are listed so far
So three are left
We know Rodgers is 11
Matthews ?
Jenkins introduces Woodson
NFL Top 100: Charles Woodson
So, we have:
Clifton at 99
Collins at 96
Raji at 81
Jennings at 74
those are certain
Matthews is between 20 and 12
Rodgers is 11
And Woodson is unknown, but everything indicates that he's in top 10.
Wow, I thought the players would have a better opinion since they actually play against them. This list is most definitely not the best players of 2011 especially since it wasn't at the end of the season.
No disrespect to Woodson, but Rodgers and Matthews should be ranked higher. They had a better year than Woodson. Even T. Williams had a better year than Woodson.
PolamaluBrady
Manning
Brees
Peterson
Andre Johnson
Lewis
Peppers
Revis
Reed
That was what someone had on that link...Missing one more player?
arod should be in top 10
NFL.com news: Rodgers great but must accomplish more to be called best QBOf course he should, but its a flawed system of voting at best. But to be fair this was pre playoffs so being 11 isnt that bad. Now he would be in the top 3 I believe.
NFL.com news: Rodgers great but must accomplish more to be called best QB
NFL Videos: Debating Rodgers' ranking: Too high or too low?
No no. The "pundits" think that's accurate.
It is incredible the ammount of stupidity that comes from the national "analysts". And I say "analysts" because they don't analyze anything, they just spew out crap disguised as opinion, with no data whatsoever to support any claim they make. (I know it was voted by the players, but their perception is highly influenced by the media)
Oh well. This is actually a good thing. We all know how vengeful Rodgers is (see Kornheiser, Homer, Cowherd...). This will be just fodder for another title.
In fact, it was a tendency. Collins was too low, Jennings was too low, Rodgers was too low, Raji was too low, Tramon and Sitton didn't even make it... Maybe Woodson, Matthews and Clifton were right and won't be disturbed by the rankings, but the majority of the Packers got snubbed in this list.
It'll be one more motive for them to not get complacent.
The criteria I use for the top 100 of 2011 is, who would I rather have for the 2011 season?Its a QB driven league. The top 5 at least should all be QBs if not the top 10.