http://deadspin.com/your-team-should-win-11-maybe-12-games-this-season-1566859474
Looking around social media after the schedule release, this is dead on.
Looking around social media after the schedule release, this is dead on.
I'm with Rodell. I really don't like playing three divisional games in a row: at Detroit, at Chicago, and then the Vikings on a short week for Thursday Night Football. That is a really tough stretch.3 division games in a row that early in the season? That's terrible!
Ha! It looks like they stole a page out of the Onion, if only it was titled "Area Team should win 11, maybe 12 games this season."http://deadspin.com/your-team-should-win-11-maybe-12-games-this-season-1566859474
Looking around social media after the schedule release, this is dead on.
I'm with Rodell. I really don't like playing three divisional games in a row: at Detroit, at Chicago, and then the Vikings on a short week for Thursday Night Football. That is a really tough stretch.
Three out of the first four on the road. If we can go 3-1 or 4-0 in that stretch it could lead to a big season.
There thin all over the defense. Right now they don't have to the talent to rotate seven on the D-line. They lost two corners and now have a new guy in the slot plus Maxwell has only started two games for them. Far from proven. I would much rather play them early cause well be healthy as well. I take are roster hands down over there's the way it sits right now. The game played two years ago means nothing in the sense are running back was Cedric Benson.
I'm with Rodell. I really don't like playing three divisional games in a row: at Detroit, at Chicago, and then the Vikings on a short week for Thursday Night Football. That is a really tough stretch.
I don't mind that so much. I don't like how we only have two indoor games. Let's face it - this team hasn't been built for outdoor and cold weather. This offense runs better on dry, fast surfaces in controlled climates. Just my opinion, but the results lately speak for themselves. I suppose having Lacy alters that a bit, but still ...
As a football fan, I prefer any outdoor games. Football is supposed to me an outdoor game and bad elements makes it even better.
Oh how we Packers fans complained in the 1990s when we HAD to go play indoors at Minnesota and others. That team was built for being outdoors, as was Favre.I don't like how we only have two indoor games.
We have to steal one on the road against Chicago or Detroit. I think Chicago will be in the playoffs and Detroit I can see winning at least 9 games. I can also see later in the year us going on a 5 game win streak as well but dropping 2 division games early in the year is a realistic possibility which I pray doesn't happen. Don't be shocked if the the North has 3 teams in the playoffs as this looks to be the toughest division in football IMO. I see us beating Seattle by a small margin in the opener only if the line can hold up.
Don't be shocked if the the North has 3 teams in the playoffs as this looks to be the toughest division in football IMO.
The other teams weren´t able to win the division with Rodgers being out for eight games, I don´t see any of them challenging the Packers for the division crown if Aaron stays healthy. The NFC West is the toughest division in football, it´s not even close IMO.
Take off your green and gold glasses.We'll see...i do have the NFC west right behind the north tho.
We have to steal one on the road against Chicago or Detroit. I think Chicago will be in the playoffs and Detroit I can see winning at least 9 games. I can also see later in the year us going on a 5 game win streak as well but dropping 2 division games early in the year is a realistic possibility which I pray doesn't happen. Don't be shocked if the the North has 3 teams in the playoffs as this looks to be the toughest division in football IMO. I see us beating Seattle by a small margin in the opener only if the line can hold up.
I wouldn't call it stealing a win in Chicago considering we've won four in a row there and the Bears only win in the last 8 overall was when Rodgers went down. I expect the Packers to win in Chicago.
I would consider our last win there stealing a win. A blown coverage on a 4 th down play and a near sack by Peppers who usually doesn't miss . Yea we stole one.
Simply do not agree with this. There's a difference between being confident in your team and being unrealistic. We are not a better team, as a whole, than Seattle. I would agree that we have some better players, position for position, mainly on offense. Their defense is 10 times as good as ours even counting the guys they have lost. Did you see what they did to Manning and the Broncos' offense in the Super Bowl? Manning would have put up 30+ on our defense, just like every pass-happy team has done the past few years. Furthermore, we certainly are not the better team when the game is AT Seattle. If the game was at GB, I'd call it a 50/50 draw. At Seattle...can we beat them, absolutely, this is the NFL and we are a good team. But make no mistake about it, we will be underdogs for a good reason.
This is probably the most ridiculous statement I´ve read in a long time. It´s been only three months since the Seahawks defense nearly shut out the highest scoring offense in NFL history.
You´re right they lost three guys on the DL and they probably won´t be able to rotate seven on a constant basis next season, but not a lot of teams are capable of doing that. They still have a lot of talent on the D-line. They lost two corners, Thurmond didn´t start most of the games and Browner didn´t play after Week 10 last season. On the other site, Maxwell started the last four regular season games and every playoff game for the Seahawks, didn´t see them miss a beat with him.
Sorry, I´ve got to correct my statement from above, this is the most ridiculous statement I´ve read in a while.[/quot
Well you can have faith in the guys there going to "plug and play" I guess but rotating 7 on the D-line is huge. Big guys get tired up front and playing less snaps allows them to be more effective. They are going to have a hard time continuing to get pressure with 4 consistently. They will be weaker against the run and might have to blitz more. If that happens which I am betting, there secondary will be beatable. Especially with a guy like Aaron Rodgers and weapons he has to work with. Packer plus 5 with Aaron Rodgers and healthy roster? This is an early Christmas present. Everyone thinks this is the same Seahawk team and it isn't.