de_real_deal
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2007
- Messages
- 591
- Reaction score
- 0
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80938113
According to Mark Murpy of the Packers, whoever that is.
According to Mark Murpy of the Packers, whoever that is.
Are you serious? You don't know who Murphy is? He's the fricken CEO
Chevelle2 said:Are you serious? You don't know who Murphy is? He's the fricken CEO
I believe that is a play on words.. in the never ending battle between Deal and Trom.. a verbal flipping the bird to the Favre Firster nickname.
de_real_deal said:Chevelle2 said:Are you serious? You don't know who Murphy is? He's the fricken CEO
I believe that is a play on words.. in the never ending battle between Deal and Trom.. a verbal flipping the bird to the Favre Firster nickname.
What is this battle you speak of?
de_real_deal said:Pack93z said:Chevelle2 said:Are you serious? You don't know who Murphy is? He's the fricken CEO
I believe that is a play on words.. in the never ending battle between Deal and Trom.. a verbal flipping the bird to the Favre Firster nickname.
What is this battle you speak of?
Maybe a battle is too extreme.. the sparring maybe. Or at least that is my perception.. possibly incorrectly at that.
Personally.. I would have used a line like that in response to someone coining me as a Favre Firster..
You aren't disagreeing you are arguing to feed your ego.
Not knowing who Mark Murphy is, takes away your right to argue Packer football. It's just not possible.
Is this thread even necessary - powers that be?
You aren't disagreeing you are arguing to feed your ego.
Not knowing who Mark Murphy is, takes away your right to argue Packer football. It's just not possible.
Is this thread even necessary - powers that be?
de_real_deal said:You aren't disagreeing you are arguing to feed your ego.
Not knowing who Mark Murphy is, takes away your right to argue Packer football. It's just not possible.
Is this thread even necessary - powers that be?
Better question, who gives a damn about Mark Murphy or what he has to say.
de_real_deal said:Better question, who gives a damn about Mark Murphy or what he has to say.
de_real_deal said:You aren't disagreeing you are arguing to feed your ego.
Not knowing who Mark Murphy is, takes away your right to argue Packer football. It's just not possible.
Is this thread even necessary - powers that be?
Better question, who gives a damn about Mark Murphy or what he has to say.
de_real_deal said:Also according to Aaron Rodgers, packers 2nd string, the Packers are moving on without him
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sOxC5Mn5cJo
2:50 - 4:00. Oops, you're wrong Aaron. How embarrassing.
They should know better and succumb to the wishwashiness
of a 38 year old QB who may have 2 years and countless more
interceptions left.
They are IDIOTS I tell ya...
pack_in_black said:Come on, fellas, ease up on d_r_d. He's good people.
Seriously, he's a good poster.
pack_in_black said:Come on, fellas, ease up on d_r_d. He's good people.
Seriously, he's a good poster.
Cal2GreenBay said:They should know better and succumb to the wishwashiness
of a 38 year old QB who may have 2 years and countless more
interceptions left.
They are IDIOTS I tell ya...
Cal... I have an honest question.. when Aaron has his first multiple INT game.. will you be on here to rationally discuss his performance?
*edit.. from pete's sakes I can't type today.. :lol:
de_real_deal said:Also according to Aaron Rodgers, packers 2nd string, the Packers are moving on without him
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sOxC5Mn5cJo
2:50 - 4:00. Oops, you're wrong Aaron. How embarrassing.
hehe 2nd string. Clever.
Too bad Murphy, Thompson, and McCarthy are idiots for handing
the franchise to a 2nd stringer. How stupid are they huh?
They should know better and succumb to the wishwashiness
of a 38 year old QB who may have 2 years and countless more
interceptions left.
They are IDIOTS I tell ya...
pack_in_black said:I have a low ball carry. Like, at my knees low.
pack_in_black said:I have a low ball carry. Like, at my knees low.
ha