1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Our New Coach Good for Both Brett and Aaron ?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by WinnipegPackFan, Jan 12, 2006.

  1. WinnipegPackFan

    WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +0
    It seems he has ties to both, runs the West Coast Offence. I am trying to be optomistic here but want to know what you all think. Does our new coach look like a good fit for both Brett and Aaron ? Opinions ?
     
  2. PackerTraxx

    PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,028
    Ratings:
    +0
    My thoughts exactly. I believe that had a lot to do with TT's decision. Maybe he can coach Brett to better decisions and develop Rodgers, which was two of my worries with Sherman and Bevell.
     
  3. paxvogel

    paxvogel Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Ratings:
    +0
    He was Brett's coach for one season under Rhodes and lets look at other QB he "helped" Aaron Brooks develop into the star he is, lol. I don't understand this at all.
     
  4. SuperRat

    SuperRat Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    617
    Ratings:
    +0
    I was reading about him and Aaron Brooks and the word is that he was the only guy that could handle Brooks and he left New Orleans because management didn't agree with him on how to handle Brooks so he left and Aaron Brooks completely fell apart this season. I think this is good news for the Packers because if Favre stays he can stand up to him and not let the bad decisions slide.
     
  5. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Ratings:
    +1
    Well if Favre doesn't return and we look for a veteran QB to compete with Rodgers, could it be Brooks? NO is giving up on him.
     
  6. HatestheEagles084

    HatestheEagles084 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,423
    Ratings:
    +1
    Good for Brett-He can create new ways for people to get open, so Brett doesnt have to throw the ball into double coverage because no one else on the offense is capable of what to do--a la, all of last season/the minnesota playoff game--I expect more "safe routes"--check down-type routes, look for Franks (if health) to get more involved than he ever was under Mike Sherman...maybe we'll see some screen passes too, this will differ from Sherrosley's "alright guys, run somewhere and Brett will throw the ball at you...hard" offense

    Good for Rodgers-McCarthy's helped to develop some guys who are established NFL QB's--Grbac, Gannon, Delhomme, Brooks, Bulger...certainly not superstars, but who said Rodgers was gonna be one--I hope he develops a system that Rodgers can ease into, when the situation calls for him
     
  7. WinnipegPackFan

    WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +0
    Javon,

    This sounds positive and seems to make good sense. Thanks You.
     
  8. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    I know for favre he does. I'm really pulling for drafting LenDale White, AND A STARTING GAURD that is mobile(can pull on running plays)!

    The draft is deep at LBer and we can get a solid player later on. my view points have changed b/c of our new HC. i feel the best way to get the new o rolling is w/a strong running game, and the running attack is #4's best friend.

    if the team is successful, and by succesful, i mean the packers make the playoffs in '06, i don't see why Brett wouldn't pursue a championship and keep playing beyond '06.
     
  9. WinnipegPackFan

    WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +0
    "if the team is successful, and by succesful, i mean the packers make the playoffs in '06, i don't see why Brett wouldn't pursue a championship and keep playing beyond '06".

    OH YEAH, Now were Talking !!! GO PACK GO
     
  10. PackerChick

    PackerChick Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,143
    Ratings:
    +1
    Lets just give it time. Its early yet.
     
  11. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    He's been good with aarons before, so that has to be good :p
     
  12. PACKATTACK4

    PACKATTACK4 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    Messages:
    66
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think he will be great. I think Brett will come back and thrive under MM. I also think he is what Rodgers needs to develop to his full potential. I'm sure Rodgers will be pleased now that he won't have to be subjected to the Three Stooges ( Sher, Ros, and Bev ).

    I would start by drafting White out of USC (he will be a load in short yardage and goal line situations) and signing Hutchinson away from Seattle. Then drafting some defensive help, the draft seems to be deep at LB.
     
  13. TOPackerFan

    TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,084
    Ratings:
    +0
    No way should a top 5 pick be spent on a back as ordinary as White. Take Mario Williams at #5 and Calhoun in the second if you don't think Gado is the answer. I agree we should sign Hutchinson though.
     
  14. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Ratings:
    +1
    I'm not sold on White. I think there is a risk that all those "inside" yards he got were because teams keyed on the outside (Bush) and the pass (Leinart).
     
  15. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
     
  16. HatestheEagles084

    HatestheEagles084 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,423
    Ratings:
    +1
    i still don't like the "running back draft pick" talks...when guys such as Moe Williams will be out there for us in free agency, Moe Williams is a veteran, can catch the ball--and there's gonna be a damn good player available with our pick at #36...perhaps a guard, a linebacker, a d-lineman, a corner--depending on where we go with the #5 pick

    Say we won a few more games and drafted at #15, I'd like Lendale White a whole lot more...but where we draft there is going to be a plethora of defensive gems there for our taking...even if we trade down to 10
     
  17. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    but what better way to breal in a new coach, oc, and take some pressure off of #4, than to pound the ball to a stud back 25-30 times a game.
     

Share This Page