I am pretty upset by this and I will list my points below. I think what most people are missing is the fact of Value Based Drafting. How much better is player A than the next available player at his position?
IMO Green Bay should have drafted James at #14 and then traded a pick and J Jones to go up and get Josh Jackson in round 2. IF a trade couldnt be done then Mike Hughes (6ft, 190) or Holton Hill (6'3 200) will likely fall to you anyways.
I would rather have JAMES/EDMUNDS + JACKSON/HUGHES/HILL over Alexander + 1st round pick.
IT IS VERY RARE TO DRAFT A GUY WHO IS THE CORNERSTONE OF A DEFENSE. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE LACKING.
Regardless of the 1st round pick, you almost never see guys like James/Edmunds drop past the top 10-12. With the way the saints are built, odds tell you they will be picking in the 20's next year. So Green Bay will likely have 23 & 28-32. That isn't enough to move up to the top 10 to draft another James/Edmunds. End of story.
Value Based Drafting
1) Derwin James was unanimously ranked (ESPN,CBS, FOX) in the top 10 of best players in the draft and top 2 at his position although most had him #1.
2) All reports said Packers had James extremely highly ranked and said they were even willing to move up to get him. He ended up falling into our lap because of QB's and Ward going early.
3) James/Fitz vs remaining game changing safeties is HUGE.
4) Alexander is regarded as a top 3 CB. CB is very deep in this draft.