3irty1
Fear the Dreads!
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2009
- Messages
- 895
- Reaction score
- 115
Rogers Vs Favre.
Please, for all that is holy just **** up about it. Yes, Favre fans believe Favre is god, i used too to. Packer fans think Roger's is god, I currently do to. The fact is neither quarterback should be crucified for losing with this team, or glorified for winning with the Vikings team. Winning and Losing is a team effort.
And before you viking/favre fans (Skol, Quientus, ect) bash me for "blaming favre for his past losses with the packers"... stop. I never have. Rogers is a Great QB. Yes, he's young still and makes mistakes but he's better than flacco, ryan, cutler, or most other quaterbacks his age in this league. Favre makes better decisions? Maybe cause he's been playing for 20 years and has the knowlege that comes with that... i have no doubt Roger's will improve in the exact same way, and I'm not blind to Roger's weaknesses.
Our Oline sucks. No If's And's Or But's. Yes, Favre did a lot in 2007. But the line was 2 years younger, and didn't have this **** up "Barbre" letting people walk right over him. Grant, somehow, actually did good the second half of 2007, which meant other teams respected the run. Makes passing easier. Regardless, Farve WAS good, and still IS good.
BUT FAVRE IS GONE. ROGERS IS HERE. who gives a hoot about "what if's". Favre retired. 3 times. If Roger's was the main reason to blame for these losses THEN i could see why this debate should be happening, but HES NOT.
I'm sick of hearing about how Rogers is a bad QB when he's obviously not, and people saying Favre is "lucky" and only gets wins because of the Vikings team. Rogers is doing good inspite of some holes in the Packers, and Favre is doing good along side the strengths of the vikings team.
Jeez... this is my first rant on this board...
Lets all move on. aladin:
Please, for all that is holy just **** up about it. Yes, Favre fans believe Favre is god, i used too to. Packer fans think Roger's is god, I currently do to. The fact is neither quarterback should be crucified for losing with this team, or glorified for winning with the Vikings team. Winning and Losing is a team effort.
And before you viking/favre fans (Skol, Quientus, ect) bash me for "blaming favre for his past losses with the packers"... stop. I never have. Rogers is a Great QB. Yes, he's young still and makes mistakes but he's better than flacco, ryan, cutler, or most other quaterbacks his age in this league. Favre makes better decisions? Maybe cause he's been playing for 20 years and has the knowlege that comes with that... i have no doubt Roger's will improve in the exact same way, and I'm not blind to Roger's weaknesses.
Our Oline sucks. No If's And's Or But's. Yes, Favre did a lot in 2007. But the line was 2 years younger, and didn't have this **** up "Barbre" letting people walk right over him. Grant, somehow, actually did good the second half of 2007, which meant other teams respected the run. Makes passing easier. Regardless, Farve WAS good, and still IS good.
BUT FAVRE IS GONE. ROGERS IS HERE. who gives a hoot about "what if's". Favre retired. 3 times. If Roger's was the main reason to blame for these losses THEN i could see why this debate should be happening, but HES NOT.
I'm sick of hearing about how Rogers is a bad QB when he's obviously not, and people saying Favre is "lucky" and only gets wins because of the Vikings team. Rogers is doing good inspite of some holes in the Packers, and Favre is doing good along side the strengths of the vikings team.
Jeez... this is my first rant on this board...
Lets all move on. aladin: