milani
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2012
- Messages
- 8,447
- Reaction score
- 4,100
I saw results of a poll yesterday. I believe it was the Milwaukee Journal. 52% to keep MLF and 39% to part with him. The rest had no opinion.
I saw a Facebook post a week ago from a woman who posted “who cares about the games, hell yes he should be back!”, which was agreed with by other women in the thread.I saw results of a poll yesterday. I believe it was the Milwaukee Journal. 52% to keep MLF and 39% to part with him. The rest had no opinion.
I never got the Pederson move. He just won a Superbowl for them with great playcalling. But maybe he was kind of back and forthAnybody can get canned. Just ask John Harbaugh or Doug Pederson.
I wish I could have been a fly on the wall and eavesdropped on these negotiations.
Think the women like MLF?I saw a Facebook post a week ago from a woman who posted “who cares about the games, hell yes he should be back!”, which was agreed with by other women in the thread.
Nothing says “we’re a serious franchise” more than half our fanbase placing “eye candy” higher on the head coach qualification list than “does job well.”
The Patriots are a jugernaut? LOL, you’d have to explain your definition there.Why is it that New England can turn a total dumpster fire with numerous holes into a powerful juggernaut overnight, and we have to hear “hang on! Be patient! Youngest team in the NFL! Growing and developing!” for like 5 years.
I think here its Amishmafia to keep MLF and everyone else to part with him.I saw results of a poll yesterday. I believe it was the Milwaukee Journal. 52% to keep MLF and 39% to part with him. The rest had no opinion.
Not sure if you’ve been paying any attention to football outside of Green Bay or not, but at the moment they’re 15-3, the 1 seed in the AFC and the conference favorite to go to the Super Bowl. At the time I’m writing this they just picked off Stroud for the 4th time in the first half.The Patriots are a jugernaut? LOL, you’d have to explain your definition there.
Jordan Love was 17th out of 32 QBs in the league. For the statistically challenged, that’s in the bottom half.This guy had one of the better running QBs in the league and didn't script a play or three for him against the Bears? He's so innovative! Please. Not even a tackle eligible play all year. Too predictable, run right into the heart of the D-line and blow a down. I'm not impressed. Poor game/click management. You call a TO and then get a delay of game penalty?
I guess MLF has had the Packers in Jugernaut status in the past thenNot sure if you’ve been paying any attention to football outside of Green Bay or not, but at the moment they’re 15-3, the 1 seed in the AFC and the conference favorite to go to the Super Bowl. At the time I’m writing this they just picked off Stroud for the 4th time in the first half.
I guess if “arguably the best team in the NFL” doesn’t meet your definition of a juggernaut, I’m not sure what does.
17th out of 32 in what? Because he was 2nd in QB rating and 6th in QBR.Jordan Love was 17th out of 32 QBs in the league. For the statistically challenged, that’s in the bottom half.
Absolutely! Unfortunately, not once in the last 4 years, and they always choked when they were a juggernaut.I guess MLF has had the Packers in Jugernaut status in the past then
So is the 32ndJordan Love was 17th out of 32 QBs in the league. For the statistically challenged, that’s in the bottom half.
You said he was one of the better running QBs in the league. He’s in the bottom half… 17th out of 32. I don’t want designed runs for Love except in verrrrrrrrry limited special situationa, if at all17th out of 32 in what? Because he was 2nd in QB rating and 6th in QBR.
Or is this just one of those examples of people using statistics to paint whatever narrative they want?
Yet by your definition clearly capable of creating a juggernaut. (You might want to consult a dictionary)Absolutely! Unfortunately, not once in the last 4 years, and they always choked when they were a juggernaut.
BingoSo is the 32nd
I actually said no such thing.You said he was one of the better running QBs in the league. He’s in the bottom half… 17th out of 32. I don’t want designed runs for Love except in verrrrrrrrry limited special situationa, if at all
I was talking about Willis.Jordan Love was 17th out of 32 QBs in the league. For the statistically challenged, that’s in the bottom half.
Nope. I was referring to Willis who never saw action if Love was active. What a waste.You said he was one of the better running QBs in the league. He’s in the bottom half… 17th out of 32. I don’t want designed runs for Love except in verrrrrrrrry limited special situationa, if at all
So are Mike McCarthy and Doug Pederson, I guess, but they’ve got rings.Yet by your definition clearly capable of creating a juggernaut. (You might want to consult a dictionary)
Exactly how would that have helped us beat the Bears in the playoffs? Willis didn’t didn’t play. Love had a phenominal game. Im a little confused how one can argue that a guy (in very limited action) performed as “one of the better running QBs in the league” while at the same time alluding that his team did nothing to facilitate that.I was talking about Willis.
They now have an excellent coach with good drafting, etc.Why is it that New England can turn a total dumpster fire with numerous holes into a powerful juggernaut overnight, and we have to hear “hang on! Be patient! Youngest team in the NFL! Growing and developing!” for like 5 years.
So any team that wins a Super Bowl is a juggernaut… gotchaSo are Mike McCarthy and Doug Pederson, I guess, but they’ve got rings.