packerflatlander, the first year Favre was with the Vikings, he schooled the packers both games. So while the packers did end up winning the super bowl in 2010 which is the only "revenge" that matters. so really it is 1-0.
Big deal. Winning those two regular season games didn't get Favre a ring. Sorry, I don't consider that to be worth anything. The Vikings losing the title game wiped that all out. You don't think Ted was smirking after that? I know I was, lol. I was so happy, I ran around the bar three times. Favre got what he deserved and even more so when Rodgers won it all, one year later.
I don't get why fans have to hate a player because he left in free agency? So what he went to the vikings,? they offered him a great contract, why wouldn't he take it? He wants to be financially secure, he has his ring, he doesn't need anything else other than some money to be set for the rest of his life.
I don't hate anyone. You're right - Jennings did what any sensible free agent would do. It doesn't change the fact that he acted all mopey towards the end of last season. As for Favre, no I don't see him in a positive light and that's just the way I see it. The dude is a drama queen and a dirtball. I think more fondly of ****ey, Majkowski, and Rodgers.
the packers weren't going to pay him(not that I think they should have) so get over it. And another thing the packers players need to shut up and focus on not getting embarrassed again in the playoffs.
Nothing to "get over". I'm glad they didn't pay him. As for getting embarrassed in the playoffs, I couldn't agree with you more. Until they can beat the Giants and 49ers, they absolutely do have a lot to prove.