Vrill
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,803
- Reaction score
- 137
I think if the light ever truly comes on and stays on for this guy, that he could be an all pro type player in our system. Maybe last night against Seattle is the beginning.
I think if the light ever truly comes on and stays on for this guy, that he could be an all pro type player in our system. Maybe last night against Seattle is the beginning.
I absolutely love Elliot and want to see him on the field more often.Time will tell if he's a full-time player or not. There's no doubt that he made the most of his limited reps last night and made two huge plays.
Not bad for an undrafted free-agent out of Toledo.
Seems odd to me that they aren't "up" every week. If the season were 162 games I could see being flat occasionally, but not in a 16 game season. That's on the coaches, imo. As Fox says about his Bears team: "We'll find guys who want to do it."I wish we played Seattle every week because our D gets up for them.
Player of the game for his 2 turnovers collected.I absolutely love Elliot
Great minds think alike. Elliot's boss, MM, essentially said the same thing about needing to get the kid out on the field more!I absolutely love Elliot and want to see him on the field more often.
I think he's a liability in run defense compared to Neal and Perry. Passing downs? Sure, why not.With Matthews playing inside full-time now it's important to get production from other outside linebackers. Elliott's snap count will increase if he continues to make great plays like yesterday.
I think he's a liability in run defense compared to Neal and Perry. Passing downs? Sure, why not.
I've seen defend some runs in preseason, and there's a reason why you have not seen him doing it very much. Even his pass rush technique is one-note and unpolished, but he plays with a lot of energy and runs to the ball, something that is often lacking in this defense, even if that was not the case last night.I haven't seen him defending the run a whole lot so far so it's tough to make an educated guess about his ability.
I've seen defend some runs in preseason, and there's a reason why you have not seen him doing it very much. Even his pass rush technique is one-note and unpolished, but he plays with a lot of energy and runs to the ball, something that is often lacking in this defense, even if that was not the case last night.
I am unconvinced. The other 34 run snaps against those 2nd. and 3rd. stringers include snaps showing a guy too often out of position. I think he's a still a year away from being a reliable 3-down player, which he may need to be with Perry and Neal in their contract years.PFF had Elliott ranked as the second best outside linebacker in run stop percentage during this year's preseason with seven stops on 41 run snaps.
Jayrone Elliott’s two game-changing fourth-quarter plays were the direct result of … Eddie Lacy’s ankle injury? ... when Lacy left on a cart during the first quarter, it was the first domino in a personnel chain-reaction. With Lacy out, James Starks took over as the Packers’ lead running back. With Starks in that role, he had to abdicate his special-teams responsibilities. That forced outside linebacker Andy Mulumba to fill Starks’ spots on special teams, but because Mulumba was part of the linebacker rotation on defense, someone had to pick up some of those snaps. That someone was – you guessed it – Elliott, who made a fantastic one-handed interception when he diagnosed a screen pass and then cemented the victory by forcing a fumble on Seattle’s final possession.
Would it ever make sense to say 'thank goodness Lacy had to leave the game'? Not really but consider this from Jason Wilde:
http://www.espnmadison.com/common/page.php?feed=2&id=21851&is_corp=1
I thought all the outside guys looked good, Neal, Perry, and Peppers looked good. If Perry and Neal can stay healthy all year it will be good.With Matthews playing inside full-time now it's important to get production from other outside linebackers. Elliott's snap count will increase if he continues to make great plays like yesterday.
I'm not sure that's the reason Elliott was on the field late in the fourth quarter. If I recall it correctly he replaced Mulumba after the latter lost contain on Wilson several times.
That's right. I too read what captainWIMM's post referred to, but Wilde's story was more fun! (Seriously I don't know which is true.)Main point he was on the field and produced..I dont think to many people really care what the exact reason was..
I thought all the outside guys looked good, Neal, Perry, and Peppers looked good. If Perry and Neal can stay healthy all year it will be good.