1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

1st Half impressions

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by tromadz, Aug 28, 2006.

  1. pyledriver80

    pyledriver80 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,391
    Ratings:
    +0

    I overestimated Troms knowledge, thanks for helpinghim out!
     
  2. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    so its sack or bust?

    wow, ur a ******* moron
     
  3. NDPackerFan

    NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,253
    Ratings:
    +4
    Why is P@ck...er, pyle a Packer fan? Just curious....
     
  4. packedhouse01

    packedhouse01 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,560
    Ratings:
    +1
    Zero I hate it when people say that. The preseason doesn't count in the standings,but it counts in so many ways. All you have to do is look at the way we tackle, catch the ball, defend the pass, block, run the ball and you have to know that of course all of this counts. The score doesn't count, what iws happening on the field counts a great deal
     
  5. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0

    Hmmm, you must be drunk. The Bengals scored 24 points on our Defense. Our offense scored a whopping 7. Whats so hard to understand Dale?[/quote:3pjm9bxo]
     
  6. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    what's so hard to understand was your wording. Nothing personal, but i honestly misunderstood it. and wtf does Dale mean?
     
  7. pyledriver80

    pyledriver80 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,391
    Ratings:
    +0

    Sorry Trom....er ND. I am glad you are impressed with the Packers. Questioning my loyalty to the Packers is so lame man. They suck and I know it, no use trying to pretend they don't.
     
  8. NDPackerFan

    NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,253
    Ratings:
    +4
    They suck so bad you should try finding a new team. Packer fans stick with them through thick or thin. Your the one who's lame with all your negativity in every single post.

    Yeah, the Packers are having a rough game....I haven't said anything else about it being positive. I still like the team though and have good reason to question if you do.
     
  9. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    Making ANY judgements(on how they'lldo in reg season) based on these preseason games (good or bad) shows how stupid you really are. I already knew, but some people think you kinda know. Now they know you're a dumb ****.

    I feel sorry for your team you coach. didnt you say they sucked too? Now I know why.
     
  10. pyledriver80

    pyledriver80 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,391
    Ratings:
    +0
    Personal Attacks again Trom, you are so easy.

    What happened to this great team Dale? Our starters were eaten alive tonight. I guess they were just not trying huh?
     
  11. NDPackerFan

    NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,253
    Ratings:
    +4
    LMAO!!!! Pyle's team is gonna win the championship!!!!
     
  12. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    Sounds like an admission to baiting to me.










    I think we should just back off the forums until tuesday night.

    NO one is happy about the Packer game, well no Packer fan is.

    We're all upset and that's not a good time to be posting.
     
  13. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    LOL. Poor pyle!
     
  14. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    WTF are you talking about, i love the Pack, have since the early 70's

    we stink dude. i still hope for 9 wins, but we got some heavy problems.

    our biggest is protecting our HOF QB. how do you do that?
    #1, establish the run. the key to the season lies in our o-line and protecting the QB and creating holes for the running game.
     
  15. pyledriver80

    pyledriver80 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,391
    Ratings:
    +0

    Yeah but Dale can't accept it. If you question them you must be a hater.
    As far as my team goes genuis, they were 7-3 last year and are 1-0 this year with a win Saturday 22-0.

    Resorting to attacking kids is pretty pathetic.
     
  16. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    yeah... i guess when nearly every player who starts in this league essentially says that the preseason is a waste, we should expect our starters to be motivated to knock off one of the best teams in the league. in a meaningless game. Cincy was at home, with the return of Carson. There was a little motivation there. The crowd was jacked, GB came out flat. These guys know they have to play another game in 3 days. They were sloppy, undisciplined, and unmotivated.
     
  17. umair

    umair Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    923
    Ratings:
    +0
    pyledriver80 is just keeping it real.

    the packers played horrible and all the starters played in the first half. i dont think their should be any excuses for giving up 34 points in one half.

    the packers didnt do good on any side of the ball. the most impressive player was favre and he wasnt even that good.
    comp/at yrds td int
    12/25 162 1 1
     
  18. yooperfan

    yooperfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,900
    Ratings:
    +0
    Right now we are even missing Roman!
     
  19. Krelian

    Krelian Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    Ratings:
    +0
    Come on now guys, just cause the Pack are getting a :whippin: doesn't mean you need to turn on each others. The only person you guys should really be excited about is Al Harris, and that isn't saying much.

    But yeah, Tromadz your outlook on the impressions are way off. It's not a real in depth analysis and most of it is wrong, even though I'm not a Packer fan i'll do it for you.

    Good:
    Al Harris: Shutting down Chad Johnson he did, props to him for that, holding one of the leagues best to 0 catches is a good feat.

    Donald Driver: Looks good, just like last year, a YAC machine.

    Special Teams: The punter Ryan looked strong, 44.8 yards a punt for average and the return game looks solid.

    Greg Jennings: Crisp route running, has a nice ability to get open as it seems.

    Nick Collins: He was everywhere nice tackle total for a saftey.


    Bad:
    Pass Rush: sure they got to Palmer on several occasions, but nothing to show for it, KGB seemed to be the only one but nothing phased Palmer.

    O-Line: a few false starts, the center looked lost, the gaurds kept getting knocked to the side liek they were not there mainly by Sam Adams, any other premier DT will eat this line up.

    Linebackers: Even though they are expected to do well as well they should, talented group, they looked very sluggish coming off the ball and meeting the ball carrier in the A gap.

    Pass Defense: Al Harris and Collins will hold their own, but Manuel and Woodson seemed lost at times and slow, might pick it up at the start of the season.
     
  20. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    POW!#$%&!! YOU NAILED IT!

    great post!
     
  21. retiredgrampa

    retiredgrampa Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2005
    Messages:
    804
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't get it. Favre looked good??? 12-25 w/1 INT and a fumble? He was throwing high and outside all night. No touch at all...just cannon balls. Sorry, I don't see it.
     
  22. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yeah Favre did play bad. Just under 50 completion %

    This reminded me of Baltimore from a year ago.
     
  23. PackerSacker54

    PackerSacker54 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    709
    Ratings:
    +0
    :roll: Your'e right 24-7 sounds a heck of a lot closer. :lol:
     
  24. TomAllen

    TomAllen Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    Ratings:
    +0
    What game did you people watch..are you crazy?

    Did you see how many drops there were, and the guy was hurried all night..The o-line made the Bengals D look like the '85 bears.

    He wasn't great, but he wasn't awful either. That interception was right in Driver's hands....

    Coupla more catches and his completion % is 65-70%....

    Yeah, but he sucked, right. Let's blame it all on him like last year!

    Do you guys finally see what real receivers look like? They play for Cincinnati...
     
  25. Schmitty

    Schmitty Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2005
    Messages:
    356
    Ratings:
    +0
    Our special teams didnt look half bad. Raynor was hitting the end zone on kickoffs. I havent seen that happen consistently for years.
     

Share This Page