Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Roman hurt

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by net, Jun 6, 2005.

  1. net Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    901
    Location:
    Rhinelander
    Ratings Received:
    +25 / 1 / -0
  2. leopardmech Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Message Count:
    459
    Location:
    Barrie, Ontario, Canada
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I hope this isn't serious. Defence is not the side of the ball we can afford to lose players.
    I was hoping he would double his sack total from last year.
  3. NDPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,253
    Location:
    North Dakota
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Sorry about my new thread started on the same subject. Noticed this one only after I posted. I guess that's why I'm a "ROOKIE". My apology :oops: :oops:
  4. HatestheEagles084 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,423
    Location:
    Allentown, PA
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Mark Roman was the whipping boy of the defense, one bust of a free agent signing, and now people are dissapointed to see him hurt.

    I'll be glad if opening day our two starting safeties aren't what they wre in '04...Sharper was overrated i've said it all along, and Roman was a dissapointment...granted i didn't want to see roman hurt, just benched...Earl Little, Arturo Freeman, Nick Collins, Marviel Underwood, plenty of options at the safety position
  5. net Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    901
    Location:
    Rhinelander
    Ratings Received:
    +25 / 1 / -0
    My take on Roman's "bust" was Slowik couldn't figure out what he should be doing. Early on he looked aggressive, then became more passive as the season wore on.

    I think he has some games left, but he has to show what he has early or it's exit stage left.
  6. HatestheEagles084 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,423
    Location:
    Allentown, PA
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    thats a good point...it would be unfair to any player to judge them by the year they had under bob slowik
  7. ArizonaPackerFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Message Count:
    729
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I hate to see anyone hurt, but I just don't think Roman is the answer. To me he's just a stopgap until one of the younger guys deveops, kind of like hawthorne last year at DB.

    If Marvin Lewis with the Bengals didn't want him, I don't see why Bates would.

    Roman was second on the team in missed tackles.

    "He cant cover and he wont tackle, one scout said about Roman shortly after the Eagles game. Just awful. "

    He has made no interceptions. He has forced no fumbles. He has recovered no fumbles. And only had 2 passes defensed all year.

    In the first eight games, Roman allowed 3 1/2 plays of 20 yards or more and just 1/2 touchdown pass. However, in the last seven games, he has allowed 5 1/2 plays of 20 yards or more and four touchdown passes.

    The total of nine plays of 20 yards or more allowed by both Roman and free safety Darren Sharper are the most allowed by a Packers safety in a full season (counting playoff games) since 1999.
  8. arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,645
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca.
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    yeah it just doesn't seem right to fault Slowick for Roman's mistakes. a talented player could excel under a Campo defense. throw in the fact that the entire defensive scheme is new and everybody is starting on page 1...aside from chemistry with fellow teammates, a player returning from last year doesn't neccesarily mean much at all as far as the playbook is concerned. i just don't think he will be missed.

    that being said, any injury on the roster is a negative. that goes without saying.
  9. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Roman has cap issues (524K) of bonus money against the cap that if cut would be 262K in 05 and 06 cap hits.
  10. arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,645
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca.
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    can't really cut injured players anyway. or would it be ok since the injury was negligent on his part and not football related?
  11. arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,645
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca.
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0

Share This Page