If we got Jones then it would mess up our RB core i mean one of the 3 would probably have to go cus i doubt the packers want to have 4 running backs and if green is healthy the whole yr this would be a dumb trade. Get someone we need this year.
Zero2Cool said:JavonWalker084 said:can we cut him june 1st?
Can you change your name you Denver Bronco fan!!
We should trade Roman (underacheiver) to the Cowboys for J. Jones (overacheiver)!
J. Jones
2004 as a rookie amassed 819 yards in 8 games (16 games would be 1600+)
2004 as a second year back amassed 993 yards in 13 games (16 games would be 1200+)
He also has 12 TD's in his two years. 7 as a rookie 5 in his second year.
You can see Jones for Roman is a good trade. For both teams. Cowboys need a third string Safety and the Packers need a young promising RB. Throw in a ... wtf am i kidding ... theres no way this is a possible trade.
I'll gladly GLADLY eat my words if this trade does go down lol and the cowboys will be me second favorite team
Packman5 said:If we got Jones then it would mess up our RB core i mean one of the 3 would probably have to go cus i doubt the packers want to have 4 running backs and if green is healthy the whole yr this would be a dumb trade. Get someone we need this year.
bozz_2006 said:i think somebody needs an attitude adjustment... i'd be a rich young man if i had a nickel for every time my pop told me that.
digsthepack said:Roman should be cut pronto since he is such a candy-*** little turd.
How dare the Packers expect him to compete for his position...especially after his stellar performance the last 2 years.
My guess is his attitude will change quickly, or the coaching staff will change it for him...with a change of employment status.
warhawk said:digsthepack said:Roman should be cut pronto since he is such a candy-*** little turd.
How dare the Packers expect him to compete for his position...especially after his stellar performance the last 2 years.
My guess is his attitude will change quickly, or the coaching staff will change it for him...with a change of employment status.
There is some comfort in knowing that this management staff will not put up with any crap on this issue. I remember years back when we started getting some attitude stuff going on and for a period this was being tolerated.
The position of this staff is clearly stated and Roman can go roam around somewhere else. Even if he was above marginal status, which he is not, this kind of stuff has got to go.
Roman is making an idiot out of himself. He deserves no communication on their part in making moves that helps this team get better. None. He ought to be worried about his tackling skills far more than the Packers communication skills.
tromadz said:I still say trade him...get something for him.
yeah he could pick up a 4th round pick and turn it into two fiths a sixth and a 7thtromadz said:with TTs talent at drafting(although time will tell, but on the surface...it looks good) getting a 2nd day pick should be fine.
I agree with the " Disrespected me" part of it. No player is really disrespected when they sign that contract they answer to whatever the owner or GM wants them to do.tromadz said:I hate when players play the "Disrespected me" card. That's such b.s.. But what do THEY say when THEY hold out or do slimey stuff like that. "Oh, it's just business."
Bye Mark.
DePack said:I agree about the Roman part but the jury is still out on the statement "this management staff will not put up with any crap on this issue". I'm not saying this is wrong but where are you getting this idea from? Roman asked to be released or traded...management said "no".
Walker asked to be released or traded....management said "no" then caved in to his demands. I'm not in disagreement with managements final decision on Walker. It got to the point where we had to do something or get nothing. Based on what has happened so far, I'm just not ready to say that "this management staff will not put up with any crap on this issue".