1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up/a> or Log In

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Do you miss the trolls?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, Dec 14, 2011.

  1. Forget Favre
    Offline

    Forget Favre Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,074
    Ratings:
    +2,288 / 51 / -15
    If Aaron Rodgers keeps on playing at this level, maybe one ring is all Eli, Drew etc is ever going to get.
  2. Bogart
    Offline

    Bogart Duke Mantee

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Mobile, AL U.S.
    Ratings:
    +871 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992

    I don't think Eli would have a ring at all if it wasn't for luck. Favre's pick in the NFC Championship....Then Assante Samuel dropping the game winning INT in the Super Bowl. Tyree's circus catch....that kid had a LOT of luck!

    For Brees, I was very happy to see him get a ring. Even if he don't win another one, he has what Dan Marino never got after playing all those years he played. I find Drew a much more likable guy than the Mannings.
  3. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    Girl. Me.

    This is the only forum I have posted on for weeks anyway. lmao. So many football forum are just....unreadable to me at times. I can't even go through the mental pain anymore of reading what some fans say.

    You know what? Best all time "troll" I ever met was a Pats fan under the name "Da Pats troll." At least he was honest and entertaining. Nothing worse then trolls in denial.
  4. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    Brees is also lucky Peyton and Favre blew it. And you know this. A lot of SB teams get some luck. Not just Eli and the Giants.


    I adore Manning but 7 points in the second half of the SB and a pick 6 trying to tie the game and I don't even put all the blame on the onside kick....there was plenty of time left.. Not his best. I still feel that was a huge let down by Peyton. I felt the Colts offense blew the SB as much as the Saints won it.

    Colts also got lucky in 2006 with the SB opponent. The Bears were not in the same league as the top AFC teams IMO.

    Really many SB winning teams get some luck on their side. I give mostly credit to the Giants D line though for beating NE in the big one.
  5. Bogart
    Offline

    Bogart Duke Mantee

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Mobile, AL U.S.
    Ratings:
    +871 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992

    I thought Brees really played well in the Super Bowl, even though the pick 6 did seal it.

    I think the Colts under estimated their opponent in that Super Bowl. They were up 10-0, they felt it was going to be a cake walk early on, even before the game it felt like they thought they already had it won. But also, the second half really was a change of tide, and I don't think the Colts managed it very well after that on side kick. If anyone is to blame other than Manning, it's probably Caldwell for not trying to get into the rhythm of shutting the Saints down. You let them change momentum with an onside kick or a tricky play like that, you've got to do something to throw them off.



    The Super Bowl against the Bears was really crazy. Chicago did a great job shutting down the Colts prolific passing game, by getting an INT early, and forcing field goals and not giving up TD's on many drives, but Grossman was a bust, and I don't think the Colts defense gets enough credit, but under Dungy, they had a very good defense, that seemed like an advanced scheme from what he did in Tampa Bay. Even if the Colts were going against an elite QB, I still think their defense would have caused problems, cause they knew what they were doing.


    The luckiest Super Bowl winning teams will always be the 1990 Giants (missed FG), 2001 Patriots (Tuck rule, and possible foul play) and of course, the one we all love, the 2006 Steelers lol
  6. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    Yeah the 2006 Colts really had their SB against the Pats in the title game. To me that was the SB. The Ravens were just as tough a week before that. The Bears did do a good job in the rain vs. the passing game but the Colts ran all over them. Running more is what was lacking vs. the Saints. Addai was getting yards on the ground but they did not stick with the run enough IMO.

    There was a sense of panic I felt with the Colts after the onside kick. And yes Caldwell is horrible. I don't put all the blame on the offense I guess looking back but with a banged up D I thought the offense had to carry the team. And they really didn't.

    I always liked Brees a lot. If the Colts HAD to lose I could handle losing to him. But, the pick 6 and onside kick were a bit alarming. After what happened with Favre in the title game I should have known the Saints would do what they could to get a few turnovers and based on their season that turnovers were their staple. Kudos to them they got a pick 6 and an onside kick to open the second half.

    The more haunting Colts postseason loss is vs. the Steelers in early 2006. Now let me tell you. Colts win that game and they are in the Super Bowl vs. the Seahawks.

    And yeah the 2001 Pats always made me wonder a bit at times.......


    I don't sense anything drastic happening right now in the NFC. I think the Packers will get back to the SB if they are reasonably healthy. In the AFC I still think it's open. I think after the last 3 seasons with the Pats/Colts and Steelers getting to the SB hopefully we are due for a new team and we see the Ravens or Texans in it this year. God help us if the Jets are the 6th seed and get back to the title game for the third year in a row though......and need I mention Denver. Funny thing is the Pats have by far the worst D of all the AFC playoff teams this year.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Forget Favre
    Offline

    Forget Favre Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,074
    Ratings:
    +2,288 / 51 / -15
    We got Derps.
    Too few and far in between though.
  8. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    I think people don't want to troll a team as good as Green Bay. Why would you? Well a few do and might but still......

    Now for sure trolls may not join up after seeing this thread. Good job guys. You just scared them all away.
  9. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    Oh, Derps. Saw him once. I swear when I first read it you said "We got Herpes."
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Forget Favre
    Offline

    Forget Favre Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,074
    Ratings:
    +2,288 / 51 / -15
    That made me laugh!

    Yes, I dated Lindsy Lohan and Paris Hilton the same week once.
  11. Croak
    Offline

    Croak Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,011
    Location:
    New Cumberland, PA
    Ratings:
    +927 / 11 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1965
    The two are probably closely related. His posts are always, ummmm, entertaining.
  12. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    Please reconsider it momentarily. Tom Brady on the water slide is a classic. It is up to you but perhaps I can use Brady on the slide while you use something else? We can work this out.
  13. Forget Favre
    Offline

    Forget Favre Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    7,074
    Ratings:
    +2,288 / 51 / -15
    I'll stick with Tom for now.
    I might change the text.
    I'll send ya a pm if I change the picture.
    Ya know, you could always use one of those other goofy Tom Brady ones.
  14. Jules
    Offline

    Jules The Colts Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,769
    Ratings:
    +754 / 9 / -0
    Yep the choices are endless. It's like sig Christmas!!!

    Yes pm me if you make the switch. I was also once considering the drunk Big Ben or Eli pictures but I am not sure......the Brady ones are just much funnier.
    But, I really just love the Brady on the slide one the best. Keep it now. Later if you make a switch then let me know.
  15. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    15,055
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings:
    +3,522 / 86 / -26
    reaaaaaally miss the Aaron Rodger hater trolls
  16. Lunchboxer
    Offline

    Lunchboxer Guest

    Ratings:
    +76 / 3 / -4
    I remember that. Some Pitt trolls came from a forum called steeler nation I got sick of it and went over there and trolled them. I brought up how Big Ben is a rapist and they ignored it and brought up some stuff about a packer guy last year got into trouble with something. And that thread turned into a real board wars and a mod closed it.

    It was great. Fun too.
  17. GreenBayGal
    Offline

    GreenBayGal Cheese Goddess

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,374
    Location:
    30 Minutes from Lambeau, WISCONSIN
    Ratings:
    +1,122 / 2 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    Yes, entertaining at the time but leaving a reoccuring rash and irritating itch.
  18. Bogart
    Offline

    Bogart Duke Mantee

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Mobile, AL U.S.
    Ratings:
    +871 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992

    Maybe it's KARMA hitting the Pats for what they did to win that first Super Bowl :roflmao:

    Pats fans love to talk about how classless Rams fans are, just like Pittsburgh fans do the Seahawk fans after losing that Super Bowl to the refs. But I had to deal with Rams fans as a kid when they would kick the **** out of the Saints twice a year, and they are not near as bad as Bears and Vikings fans, (probably because being losers through out the majority of the 1990's humbled them to be thankful.) But I can't really blame them for still being upset over that Super Bowl. Had the Raiders made it (as they should have) I think the Rams would have slaughtered them, but I really suspect foul play in that Super Bowl, after the refs said they went easy on the Pats (Watching tape, they held Marshall Faulk just about the entire game).

    The only thing I can thank Billechek for is Nick Saban, and that's who was the ONLY thing that made him successful in Cleveland. They talk like Billechek is a defensive genius, but Eric Turner was the result of Nick Saban, and that defense wasn't all that bad, they just never had a good offense under Billechek. But Billechek as a defensive genius is hilarious when you see how bad the Patriots defense has been in the last few years.
  19. Bensalama21
    Offline

    Bensalama21 Ben

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,512
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Ratings:
    +585 / 13 / -0
    I think it's time to convert completely to Packerism.
    • Like Like x 3
  20. Bogart
    Offline

    Bogart Duke Mantee

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Mobile, AL U.S.
    Ratings:
    +871 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992

    POSSESS her with the DARK SIDE of the Force, I mean the Green Side :D
    • Like Like x 2
  21. Kitten
    Offline

    Kitten Feline Cheesehead Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,034
    Location:
    Philly/ South Jersey area
    Ratings:
    +1,388 / 7 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    Yeah, he was epic. The best was the "ramblings of MNVikes4eva" thread that somebody started.

    But the Knight troll is still one of my favorites. Beaaaarrrrsssssssss

    Those Eagles trolls from last year were pretty bad. I don't know what's worse, trying to argue with a Bears troll or an Eagles troll.
  22. Kitten
    Offline

    Kitten Feline Cheesehead Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,034
    Location:
    Philly/ South Jersey area
    Ratings:
    +1,388 / 7 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    I think she's already there, Bogart! :D

    You must be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
    • Like Like x 2
  23. Bogart
    Offline

    Bogart Duke Mantee

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Mobile, AL U.S.
    Ratings:
    +871 / 5 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992

    A Steelers troll can be worse :roflmao:
  24. bozz_2006
    Offline

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,521
    Location:
    Grand Forks, ND
    Ratings:
    +625 / 6 / -0
    There were some pretty nasty Steeler trolls before the SB last year. There were a few good fans here, though, too. Those good ones that talked up the Steelers but took their medicine after we won; they were pretty gracious. That's basically why I don't talk too much trash. I am pretty sure I can't be that gracious in defeat. lol
  25. Kitten
    Offline

    Kitten Feline Cheesehead Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,034
    Location:
    Philly/ South Jersey area
    Ratings:
    +1,388 / 7 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    There were some decent Steelers fans on here then, they are different. As I recall, they even came back to congratulate us after the win. I don't consider those guys trolls at all and I enjoyed discussions with them even before we won the game. They are just fans of another team come to watch the game with us. But the nasty Steelers fans, the ones who were bad enough to get the sack from the mods, oh my were they something. They were probably never here for any real discussion and probably never intended to be here for any length of time considering they'd get banned anyway. They were just here to rile us up and mess with us. That's my definition of a troll, one who comes to deliberately upset a discussion or agitate a group of people with a malicious intent.
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page