Zero2Cool said:
Try to follow along before you try to oust me. I asked a question, one was given, I then asked another question.
edit, nevermind, ur not worth the effort. U wanna be ignorant, thats cool, do that then. If you can't get the point, I'll take the blame. Now go find someone else to bust their balls over your nitpicking crap. Thanks.
Wow, how many meltdowns do you have per discussion? You asked a question, I answered it, then you prefaced it with a really dumb question to make it sound like the first one wasn't quite as "short bus" as it seemed and I answered that one for you too. Now I'm an ignorant ball busting nitpicker.
I hope Santa delivers a few cases of kleenex under your tree this year. Seems like you must go through them by the truckload. Happy holidays!
You did nitpick and were busting my balls. You did a good job of it. Being ignorant isn't a bad thing, I've said I was ignorant on this very forum. Don't be so defensive.
I apologize that my question was 'dumb' in your view. Not sure why you stooped so low, you got your way, I got mine.
You didn't answer the question either. Or I missed it. Could you please refresh my memory? You posted several nice trio's of WR. What I asked after that was when did they have a trio of WR of the same talent? I apologize for not being more blunt. I should also add this before you nitpick your way out of it.
When was the last time those teams you mentioned had three WR of that talent? OR atleast three WR that were really good?
Raiders 2002 and before that?
Bengals 2006 and before that?
Cardinals 2006 and before that?
Colts 2006 and before that?
I guess that's kind of vague for you as well, isn't it? How about this.
Three good WR, meaning that you can take any one of the three and put them on another team and they'd be either the number ONE or TWO starter as WR. Is that clear or do I need to go more in depth? :shrug:
Furthermore, I'm trying to say getting three WR that you can take any one of the three and they'd be a starter on another team is hard to come by.
I'd have liked the Packers to have done more(I'm a fan, I always want more, but I'm reasonable and understanding with how the system works) to get other WR or to KEEP WR they had. (ie, Mayes, Walker, Glenn, etc).
To say the Packers have failed at giving Brett good talented WR to throw to. I think is a bit of a stretch and thats coming from a Brett homer. I think the management has given Brett targets and good ones at that. They seem to get injured or suspended. d'oh! Is that the managements fault? Yes and no. Injuries are unpredictable (unless the player was injury prone prior to joining the Packers). The Koren situation I think was a good risk. I really think he'll be a good player for the Packers next year as the 3rd WR and KR.
Hopefully that clears everything up!
P@ck66 said:
My original point was that if you start with Brett Favre as your QB, it's a no brainer to try and bring in some stud receivers to build around so that you have a chance to win. That should be the first thing...behind building the O-Line...
Think about how this Green Bay team would be if Favre had Arizona's receiving corps...? or Cincinnati's? ..or Indianapolis's's's? ...or Dallas'ssss?
:thumbsup:
(I said the same thing when Sherman was GM. He didn't do it either.)
Look what has happened in the last two years however....
You have basically just Donald Driver as your only receiving threat again...
KRob got suspended. Jennings got hurt. I won't even mention Ferguson, and then you have a bunch of street free agents or NFL Europe quality players.
How can you expect to win that way?
KROB was a risk...Ferguson and underachiever..and we got unlucky with Jennings injury. If we would have had at least one more solid WR this year, I think we win a few more games and are in the playoffs...
Just the way I see it...
If Brett had any of those sets of WR we'd be freakin lethal! I think Brett's skills have diminished, but thats not to say hes not still a very good QB. He's far better than we have on the roster and I'm confident he's the best QB in the NFC.
I see your point, 66. I think if we had TE's that could that would be more important than ANOTHER good WR. Remember, good WR don't seem to fall off the trees, unless of course your the Patriots! Damn them! Damn them! Damn them!