Purplepeopleeater
Cheesehead
Plus Tate pushed off. That should have been called.
As soon as Jennings catches the ball, it can be seen that Tate's left hand is touching the ball, and his right hand is on Jennings' wrist/arm, and subsequently is removed from touching anything (his right hand makes it around the helmet of Jennings, well away from any contact with the ball). The argument that his left hand touching the ball equates to possession is ridiculous. You cannot touch a ball while another guy grabs it out of the air and say that you possessed it. Jennings had two hands on it the whole way and brought it to his chest. The fact that Tate maintained his ability to touch the ball, and then wrapped his arms around it on the ground is irrelevant, and frankly, using it as an argument is just a sign of denial. It's like saying that if a mother is hugging a baby around her chest, and someone comes and puts their hand on the baby, the other person is now holding the baby (and by NFL logic, now belongs to them). Any rationalizations of joint possession in the air are unequivocally wrong.
Heya WhodatD, thanks for the words. We'll be seeing you next week huh? It'll be a real Roger Goodell love-fest next Sunday with Drew Brees and Aaron Rodgers just gushing with praise for our Commissioner and all the wonderful things he's done for this game over the last year. Hell, they should a half-time show in his honor!
If the Packers come out playing real mad against the Saints next week, don't take it personal.![]()
ExpatPacker this weeks matchup was one of the ones I was most looking forward to this season 2nd only to the rematch with the 9ers. Now. . . .not so much. The team has been decapitated and they're PLAYING that way. I will always love the Saints and will still watch 'em every single time they play but while it IS possible they could turn it around and make a great season out of this whole debacle it's pretty unlikely. Regardless of what fans' opinions on the so-called "bounty-gate" might be there is one thing that could not be more clear- Roger Goodell is BAD for the NFL. It is the implementations of HIS policies that have gotten the league into the situation that it now finds itself. It is HIS fault that that the Packers are now sitting at 1-2. Hats off to the Seahags for a great defensive game (AND to the Pack for that matter) but here we are: instead of discussing a great defensive battle we are talking about one of (if not THE) worse calls in the history of the game. It's time for Rog to go.
LMAO!!!****** Reacts To Replacement Refs (Golden Tate Touchdown)
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
I couln't agree more.We have to remember, of course, that Goodell represents the owners and it is they who decided on a lock-out, not Goodell. That being said, Goodell's tenure hasn't been good. You hit the Saints' organization with some severe penalties in the name of player safety, but then compromise that same safety by bringing in a bunch of incompetent high-school refs who can't possibly be expected to control the game? Pretty much reeks of hypocrisy. And the owners look like a bunch of greedy fat-cats who care only about money and not the integrity of the game.
Were I Goodell, if he is preaching the gospel of player safety, under these circumstances in which his message has been completely undermined, I would resign.
Tate wraps his arms around it BEFORE Jennings gets both feet on the ground. That's the key piece that everyone seems to lose sight of. Everyone is looking for the straw that breaks the proverbial back of this ridiculous referee lockout. It's hard to look at this objectively when you're actively rooting for these scrub refs to fail. This applies to most NFL fans and pretty much the entire sports media complex.
Not sure what game you watched, but we're talking about the GB-SEA game last night. The one where Jennings clearlyintercepted the football,had two hands on it, and brought it to his chest (with his feet still in the air), while Tate managed to have hisleft handarmaround Jenning's bodysecured on the football andhave aat the moment they landed on the ground both players had both hands on the ball...had his right hand on the footballDue to the universal detest for the scrub refs and the anxiety to bring the regular refs back, there's pretty much universal agreement on this, and has been widely discussed by former refs (who have an interest in siding with their union brothers) and ESPN, who over the years have clearly favored the NFL's national darlings (Cowboys, Packers, etc.)only in an alternate universe is this a simultaneous catch.
you're defending thetruth.indefensible
The Pack has 13 games left to prove themselves.
But I'm sure when they fail to reach the playoffs this season, we'll all get to listen to their "classy" fans whine about how they got jobbed in Week 3 and nothing about the fact that their offense just can't seem to get it done.
Waaaaaaahhhhh.... Waaaaaahhhhhh!!
Plus Tate pushed off. That should have been called.
13 times champions, Tate had dual possession through him being on the ground. *shrug* cant help it if you see it a different way.
I'm having a hard time following your logic.Thanks ExpatPacker, I'm not really trying to convince you guys that it is not a BOGUS call. In reality, I agree it is total BS. I would be livid if it was the other way around. At the same time though, I believe it IS a touchdown with the rules the way they are.
That said, that rule is total ********. Jennings made the catch, Tate tagged along the whole way and got just enough that by rule it's his. Honestly, some of these rules need to a) be less ambiguous and b) make ******* sense for whatever situation occurs in the game.
The rules need to be changed so that plays like this are an interception because this should have been one.
He did not have dual
You must be logged in to see this image or video!