calicheesehead
Cheesehead
Prisco vs Judge from CBS sportsline.com
link below
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/9657847
First is Prisco's statement:
If the Packers lose another three games in the next four, they should make a change. That's not an indictment of Favre. In the right situation, he can still be a quality starter. It's just that would be time to find out what this team has in Aaron Rodgers. They used a first-round pick on him in 2005, and we hear good things about him, but they have to see if he can play. If he can, then they move on with him. If he can't, then the Packers have to find a way to get another quality quarterback. Maybe it's in the draft, where Notre Dame's Brady Quinn would be the top prize. Sitting still and losing games with Favre playing quarterback is the worst thing this team can do. There is no progress to the future. By playing Rodgers, there would be.
Clark Judge's view:
Nothing. Let Brett Favre play. I don't push panic buttons after one game, and Brett Favre is not the problem here. So let the guy play. If I'm going to see Green Bay, I'm going for one guy, and it's not Ahman Green. Favre is the best quarterback in Green Bay, so he deserves to start. It's as simple as that. Now, does that mean I think Favre will resurrect the Packers? No, I don't. This is a reconstruction job that's too big for one man, even someone of Favre's stature. But Favre can make the Packers competitive. Remember, I said "can," not "will." He's on the roster for a reason, and it's not to carry a clipboard for Aaron Rodgers. So leave Favre alone. At least he gives us something to care about.
I kind of agree with Judge. I say by the beginning of the 4th if we're getting blown out then throw in the kid, otherwise let Brett.
link below
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/9657847
First is Prisco's statement:
If the Packers lose another three games in the next four, they should make a change. That's not an indictment of Favre. In the right situation, he can still be a quality starter. It's just that would be time to find out what this team has in Aaron Rodgers. They used a first-round pick on him in 2005, and we hear good things about him, but they have to see if he can play. If he can, then they move on with him. If he can't, then the Packers have to find a way to get another quality quarterback. Maybe it's in the draft, where Notre Dame's Brady Quinn would be the top prize. Sitting still and losing games with Favre playing quarterback is the worst thing this team can do. There is no progress to the future. By playing Rodgers, there would be.
Clark Judge's view:
Nothing. Let Brett Favre play. I don't push panic buttons after one game, and Brett Favre is not the problem here. So let the guy play. If I'm going to see Green Bay, I'm going for one guy, and it's not Ahman Green. Favre is the best quarterback in Green Bay, so he deserves to start. It's as simple as that. Now, does that mean I think Favre will resurrect the Packers? No, I don't. This is a reconstruction job that's too big for one man, even someone of Favre's stature. But Favre can make the Packers competitive. Remember, I said "can," not "will." He's on the roster for a reason, and it's not to carry a clipboard for Aaron Rodgers. So leave Favre alone. At least he gives us something to care about.
I kind of agree with Judge. I say by the beginning of the 4th if we're getting blown out then throw in the kid, otherwise let Brett.