1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

We lost because the d couldn't get off the field

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by TOPackerFan, Oct 23, 2005.

  1. musccy

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Ratings:
    +1
    C'mon...well he could have got Javon Kearse, Ray Lewis, Shaun Alexander, T.O. (and continue to insert pro bowler)...but you can't always afford it, and there's no guarantee that they'd pan out. Do you stop contradicting yourself? Those guys come at a cost, and you whine because he handicapped the salary cap of the team.

    Driver, Walker, and Glenn have been or were very solid wrs for him.
     
  2. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    The defense was winded because of all the 3 and outs the offense was delivering.
     
  3. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Ratings:
    +1
    digs....how could you be winded coming out of the locker room for the second half? Maybe they should have just walked out instead of jogging out.
     
  4. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm talking later throughout the half. Personally, I think they should be rolled out on Lazy-Boys with Asian massage girls working over their sore spots.
     
  5. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Ratings:
    +1
    They're all soft!
     
  6. P@ck66

    P@ck66 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,207
    Ratings:
    +0
    Why didn't he keep Glenn musscy..?

    Look at what he's doing in Dallas....(i for one, thought he should be kept, but a lot of people on this board only want alter boys to be playing for the Packers..) Plus, he was never used correctly....by SherRossley..

    another Sherman mistake?

    there are many...
     
  7. musccy

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Ratings:
    +1
    he was a good receiver but very fragile (ego and injuries) and he was going to cost a lot more soon. Once Driver broke out and MS realized he had a #1 for really cheap, Glenn became expendable.
     
  8. P@ck66

    P@ck66 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,207
    Ratings:
    +0
    You've got an answer for everything...to cover MS's ***..dont cha'..

    Well i don't buy it for one..and i still think it was a dumb move..why not have 2 good receivers...?

    cause there's no money left?
     
  9. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    We happen to have them...they just happen to be injured!
     
  10. musccy

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Ratings:
    +1
    Pack66... you have an answer for everything to cover up for Brett. Fine, the Packers throw all of their salary cap at WR and ignore the rest of the team...if he would have done that, we wouldn't have been able to keep the o-line in tact...and Ahman and the rbs wouldn't have had one of the most effective running attacks in packer history.

    MS as a GM failed in some areas (overpayed for Harris and KGB IMO, using hindsight, Hunt was a mistake), but giving Brett some quality targets and protection was not one of them.
     

Share This Page