PackerTraxx
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2005
- Messages
- 1,028
- Reaction score
- 0
http://www.jsonline.com/packer/news/mar05/309034.asp
The above has an article where Sharper says one of the reasons he signed with the Vikings was the Viking position coach he could talk to and he couldn't talk to Sherman. He signed for less than what GB had to pay him,why wouldn't he take a cut to that amount? Would GB have paid that much? Did he give them that chance?
This situation, along with Mac refusing to play for Sherman, Edwards signing for LESS money with Fish, and the ex-coache's(I forget his name)comments that Sherman wouldn't listen to their input, are not good.
Hopefully now that Sherman does not have the GM responsibilities he will establish a better rapport with his coaches and players.
The above has an article where Sharper says one of the reasons he signed with the Vikings was the Viking position coach he could talk to and he couldn't talk to Sherman. He signed for less than what GB had to pay him,why wouldn't he take a cut to that amount? Would GB have paid that much? Did he give them that chance?
This situation, along with Mac refusing to play for Sherman, Edwards signing for LESS money with Fish, and the ex-coache's(I forget his name)comments that Sherman wouldn't listen to their input, are not good.
Hopefully now that Sherman does not have the GM responsibilities he will establish a better rapport with his coaches and players.