aaronqb
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 582
- Reaction score
- 73
Go Packers
Which brings me to the issue ... would it have been better to have have Bulaga compete for the starting RT job than the starting LG job?? I believe it would better both short term and long term to have Bulaga starting at RT than at LG.
That's exactly what I wanted to say. And I like Colledge a lot more than most do, but when Tausch is in at RT, our protection is decent to good. And with him there last half of last year, and all of 2008, 2007, well Ryan Grant had great stats. So what can you say? It's not a total coincidence.IMHO it would have been better for the long term but NOT the short term. Here is why. I believe Tauscher IS better at RT than Colledge is at LG.
In my opinion, the entire offensive line outside of Bulaga and Sitton are replaceable. Clifton is playing great but this may be his last season. College, Wells and Spitz are all nothing special. I really hope TJ Lang is using this season to learn.
I should clarify on my earlier post. I definitely think we could stand to upgrade the O-line outside of Bulaga, Sitton, and probably Lang; but I don't wanna start messin' with it right now. This combination of guys is plenty serviceable, and I don't wanna take a chance on losing that.