H
They must be part of the mafia.What are they up to? -Any theories?
What are they up to? -Any theories?
What are they up to? -Any theories?
Jaybadger82
These two properties will now be part of the Packer's Titletown District project.
This website will give information about the Packer's Titletown District project
http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/133068/inside-slant-packers-cashing-in-at-lambeau
This spring, they razed 16 nearby houses to create a 400-spot parking lot....
Hmmmm....
I wonder what the story is behind the occupants of those houses.
It's one thing if they were abandoned or condemned, if the Packers owned the land or if the owners were somehow forced to give it up.
I don't think it's right to be forced or manipulated into leaving if they were privately owned.
In Madison Wisconsin a developer wanted to make a big ugly looking thing downtown that is part of the music and arts.Forget Favre,
The Green Bay Packers, Inc, do not have the authority to force property owner out of their house. The Packers do not have any eminent domain power like governments have.
The Packers have to negotiate with any home owner, who has property south(near) Lambeau Field. This property would only be used for parking.
Packer policy is that home owner must contact the Packers, if the homeowner is interested in selling his house to the Packers.
Any home located south of (near) Lambeau Field will be worth more than house in any other location in Green Bay area.
Example : A:house in any location, except in a specific location near LF, using a Relator would list $140,00o house located GB area. The house would probably sell for between $135,000 to $138,00 plus a 6% realtor charge . It may take the realtor at least 2 months or more to sell the home..
The Packers will probably go as high as paying home owner $280,000 or more for the owner's home, which is worth $140,000 due to home's location just south of Lambeau Field.
I think they've paid private owners more than market value for their expansion. They now own ~60 acres around Lambeau. This is probably what is going on:
http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/133068/inside-slant-packers-cashing-in-at-lambeau
"Murphy has made three visits to Patriot Place in Foxborough, Massachusetts, a 1.3 million square-foot multipurpose commercial district adjacent to Gillette Stadium and owned by the Kraft Group, which also owns the New England Patriots. Patriot Place includes a Renaissance hotel, 14 restaurants and dozens of shops; Murphy won't reveal specific plans for the Titletown District, but he said there is opportunity for similar development."
There is an old adage in corporate economics that if you aren't growing your dying. The Packers, just like an other organization, is looking for more ways to diversify its income portfolio. Relying merely on game revenue and merchandise sales is one thing, but having a multi-use facility could make the Packers more profitable. If they put in something like the Patriots have, then they can have more consistent revenue throughout the year, potentially host conventions, owners meetings, and who knows about the SB - but they'd have to put up a bunch of hotels. I don't know the Green Bay zoning laws at all, and maybe the Packers enjoy an exemption on property that they own, but I would expect that all of the residential lots are restricted in terms of height and use. As the gorilla in the city tax collections, I'm sure that the Packers can flex some muscle to change those zoning requirements and build just about anything they want. It means more tax revenue for the city, which they always tend to vote in favor of doing...
Is this even needed?
Aren't they making enough money as it is?
Was there ever a demand for any of this?
Seems like everything is fine the way it is now.