weeds
Fiber deprived old guy.
You know, I'm not so sure that he's a "horrible hire". I'm not sure he isn't neither. Perhaps, coming here WAS his way out of B.C.Horrible Hire...He was on his way out at BC!
Along that vein, him being a buddy of Matt's isn't necessarily an end all/be all. It'll make people nervous, sure, because Barry's hire fell along the same tenuous line ... that McVey coaching tree thing - I get it.
Thing is, Barry was a pretty obvious marginal hire based on the results his defenses generated nearly every where he stopped. We don't have that track record here with this hire.
...and Pettine wasn't Matt's hire, but was kept on because of perceived defensive improvements that disappeared quickly.
Fact is that the current scheme or its implementation did not pass the eye test (statistically a bit closer) ... I'm giving this guy a chance and hope that this doesn't remain a purse swinging defense. We're used to it, surrender chunks of yardage in the hope that someone makes a play or worse yet, that the opponent's offense shoots itself in the foot.
Enough already.... is having a defense that opponents fear too much to ask?