1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Over/Under for Brett Favre

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Zombieslayer, Aug 19, 2007.

  1. Zombieslayer

    Zombieslayer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,338
    Ratings:
    +0
    This is just for FUN. If you don't want to play, simply don't comment.

    Over/under on Favre:

    Yards - 3800
    TDs - 20
    INTs 18
    Completion % - 60

    My guess -
    Yards - Over
    TDs - Over
    INTs - Under
    Completion % - Over

    You?

    Oh, one favor - there was another O/U thread for the Packers in general (this thread is Favre specific) and I'm too stupid to know how to find it. If anyone can bump that, that would be cool.
     
  2. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    Over/under on Favre:

    Yards - 3800
    TDs - 20
    INTs 18
    Completion % - 60


    Yards - Over
    TDs - Over
    INTs - Under
    Completion % - Over

    :thumbsup: :packbeer:
     
  3. vikesrule

    vikesrule Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,933
    Ratings:
    +0
    Over/under on Favre:

    Yards - 3800
    TDs - 20
    INTs 18
    Completion % - 60

    Yards - Under
    TDs - Under
    INTs -Way Over
    Completion % - Under

    Of course, I may be somewhat biased :razz:
     
  4. Hammer

    Hammer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    651
    Ratings:
    +0
    No more biased than the first two posters....or me.
    Over, over, under, over.
     
  5. bozz_2006

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,576
    Ratings:
    +652
    over over over over
     
  6. CalifPacker

    CalifPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    757
    Ratings:
    +1
    Over, over, under, over
     
  7. Pack93z

    Pack93z You retired too? .... Not me. I'm in my prime

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,855
    Ratings:
    +22
    Yards - Avg 237 per game... Over
    Td's - Over
    Ints - Over - Career avg 18 per year (91 excluded) and youth on team.
    Comp % - Over - career 61.1 %
     
  8. vikesrule

    vikesrule Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,933
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hey Pack93z, how about the most recent...the "TT" era, the last two years average.

    Yards - 3883.........Over
    Td's - 19...............Under
    Ints - 23.5............Over
    Comp % - 58.6.....Under

    QB Rating.............71.8%

    Source: nfl.com

    "With each game I play, each season I play, everyone would agree with me, I'm running out of chances." --- Brett Favre
     
  9. vike4life

    vike4life Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    600
    Ratings:
    +0
    I must agree with my purple friend.
     
  10. Zombieslayer

    Zombieslayer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,338
    Ratings:
    +0
    Well, yes, if you follow history. I'm hoping for 3 things to happen:
    1) the OL to give Favre enough protection that we don't have to keep an RB and a TE back, thus having our 3 receivers double covered,
    2) Red Zone production from our TEs,
    3) Greg Jennings being the Greg Jennings pre-injury

    If those happen, I think Favre wil be Over, Over, Under, Over. 1 & 3 should happen, but 2 I'm worried about. I'm not too worried about Jennings not catching lots of balls in pre-season.
     
  11. spardo62

    spardo62 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    559
    Ratings:
    +0
    The numbers seem to be pretty right on(234yds. per game, 1.25 TD's per game, 1.12 Int per game) so it is tough to pick. I hope I am wrong, but here goes:
    Over
    Under
    Over
    Under
     
  12. Pack93z

    Pack93z You retired too? .... Not me. I'm in my prime

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,855
    Ratings:
    +22
    Well I would try an over under on Jackson... but there isn't much history to go upon.... and what little there is... looks good for the Packers and the rest of the NFL excluding the Vikings :razz:

    58 % completion rate
    2 TD's
    4 INT's
    and a 62.5 Rating

    Oh and the best part... The Queens staff apparently doesn't think he nor Bollinger need much work this preseason.. 4 passes apiece :razz:

    Oh I cannot wait for the live bullets to fly with these two under helm :thumbsup:
     
  13. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yards - 3800
    TDs - 20
    INTs 18
    Completion % - 60

    Yards - Under
    TD's Over (I think he'll throw 20 to 22)
    INT's Over (I'll give him 20)
    Completion % Under

    He's still a 38 year old QB. He's better than almost all 38 year old QB's but at the moment I can't see him doing much more than 22 touchdowns, 20 int's 3700 yards, and 58% of his passes completed. The main concern is when the INT's come. Hopefully never at a crucial point in the game.
     
  14. vikesrule

    vikesrule Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,933
    Ratings:
    +0
    Now now, Pack93z, don't go changing the subject. The discussion was Favre, was it not.
    You know by changing the subject to another person, that is kinda like when someone asks a "Dubya" supporter a question! :rotflmao:

    The reason that Favre is going to go "way over" on the INT's, is that in trying to get those other records, he'll be throwing into 3,4, maybe 5, deep! :thumbsup:

    Not mention this is his last year, and last shot.

    C'mon gunslinger.......Yippee-ky-ay :razz:
     
  15. jdlax

    jdlax Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    818
    Ratings:
    +0
    Oh come on, like you wouldn't rather have Bruce Willis at QB than some by the book *******! :mrgreen:
     
  16. vikesrule

    vikesrule Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,933
    Ratings:
    +0
    Funny you should mention that jdlax, for decorum sake, I left off the MF on Yippee-ky-ay :lol:
     
  17. Zombieslayer

    Zombieslayer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,338
    Ratings:
    +0
    Vikes - this is his last year as a Packer, but not his last year. I love Brett Favre and will hope he puts all the records out of reach by playing 3 more years, and will continue to root for him as long as he's not playing the Packers.
     
  18. rabidgopher04

    rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,467
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'd be surprised if Brett Favre throws for even 20 TDs in this offense. For some reason this seems to be the least TD producing offense I've ever seen the Packers have.
     
  19. Fuzznuts

    Fuzznuts Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    561
    Ratings:
    +1
    It's not for "some reason", it's for a very specific reason.

    The GM has not addressed the offensive needs for playmakers for 3 years now, and it is going to bite us in the *** yet again this year.

    But when Brett points this out, some Thompson defenders here attack him for being a bad teammate and whining about the situation. Some people here have very thin skins when it comes to Ted Thompson when really posters here are just trying to point out the reality of the situation.

    OK.

    Start attacking now. :roll:
     
  20. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    Are we 1-0?

    I think we're 1-0.

    Can anyone tell me what are record is as of right now?

    For some crazy-assed reason I think in spite of Nostradamus'(^^^^^^^^) predictions, we haven't been bitten in the *** yet, and I keep thinking that we're 1-0.

    What is the reality of this "situation" fuzznuts? Cause according to my reality, the Packers are in a "situation" of being 1-0.
     
  21. Fuzznuts

    Fuzznuts Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    561
    Ratings:
    +1
    Wait and see.
     
  22. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    WINS: 1 LOSSES: 0





    1-0
     
  23. gopackgo

    gopackgo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    730
    Ratings:
    +0
    Agreed. We played against a decent Philly D. Now we go up against a defense that got 45 points scored on them by the Cowgirls. We are still a young offense, and there is time to learn from mistakes. Next week won't give us a complete picture, but clearer.
     
  24. millertime

    millertime Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    841
    Ratings:
    +0
    Over/under on Favre:

    Yards - 3800 Over: 3998
    TDs - 20 Over: 22
    INTs 18 Under: 17
    Completion % - 60 About right
     
  25. Cdnfavrefan

    Cdnfavrefan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,624
    Ratings:
    +0
    I gotta go under with all of them except the completion % The way the offence looks and maybe even more the way the defence looks I'm thinkning an unFavre like year of 18td's 19int's and 3500 yards. I didn't say that is a bad thing though. With those #'s I see us being 500 or better. The one over he'll probably have is attempte no matter how high you set the bar. As the rookie backs feel their way around he'll put the ball up a ton starting with the Giants poor secondary
     

Share This Page