The standard is "indisputable visual evidence," not "maybe," not "probably". Indisputable. And it wasn't. I've seen calls like that upheld almost every week.
The officials hurried the ball to the line. The clock wasn't running. Often on close calls like that they will take their time on the spot if the clock isn't running. But they hurried it. They tried to beat the buzz and forced us to call a timeout. And the INT was clear. The damn side judge knew it too and inexplicably called it incomplete.
I agree with you on both points, and I've called you out in the past for complaining about officials.
There was not one single replay on Tramon's first INT that actually showed the ball contacting the ground, which is sort of necessary to call an incomplete pass. I'm sick of replay officials taking the game and putting it in their hands. If you can't tell for sure, 100%, it stands. Period. You don't get to make a decision, if it doesn't show something 100%, you leave it alone.
And the side judge most certainly, and inexplicably, blew the call. It was not a difficult call. He was nearby and staring right at it. He never actually saw the ball hit the ground because again, it obviously never did.