1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

More on Arrington :

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by WinnipegPackFan, Apr 21, 2006.

  1. WinnipegPackFan

    WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +0
    Written by PackerChatters Staff
    Friday, 21 April 2006
    Packers and Giants appear most interested

    The fact that free-agent linebacker LaVar Arrington was in New York Thursday undergoing a physical examination for the Giants doesn't necessarily mean the Green Bay Packers are out of the running for his services Tom Silverstein of the Milwaukee Journal sentinal reports.

    It would, however, seem to indicate that Arrington is serious about completing a deal before the draft April 29-30. The Giants and Packers are the teams that appear to be the most interested in landing Arrington, although Jacksonville, Miami and Cincinnati also have shown interest.




    Arrington was making his second visit to the Giants, who did not do an examination of his surgically repaired right knee the first time around and wanted to assess his physical condition. There was no indication Arrington was close to signing a contract with the Giants, but talks are expected to heat up this weekend as the former Washington linebacker attempts to land a big-money deal before the draft.

    Logic says Arrington's agents, Kevin and Carl Poston, are trying to match the deal they negotiated for linebacker Julian Peterson, who signed a seven-year, $54 million contract with the Seattle Seahawks, including an $11.5 million signing bonus. It doesn't appear any of the interested teams are willing to go that high yet.

    The Packers remain interested in Arrington and have had ongoing discussions with his agents. They apparently haven't made headway on a deal with Arrington, but they did agree to bring in another of Kevin Poston's clients, San Francisco linebacker Saleem Rasheed, for a free-agent visit.

    Rasheed, a third-round pick of the 49ers in 2002 who has been mostly a backup and special teams player the past four seasons, made an official visit Wednesday. The 6-foot-2, 229-pound Rasheed has struggled with injuries, playing in 45 of a possible 64 regular-season games, four of them starts. Last year, he was inactive for seven games.

    Neither Packers general manager Ted Thompson nor Kevin Poston responded to phone messages.

    Whether the Packers were trying to create goodwill with the Postons by bringing in one of their clients or are truly interested in another linebacker is anyone's guess.

    The Packers remain interested in another Poston client, Oakland cornerback Charles Woodson, but the Arrington deal seems to be on the front burner.

    The Packers have looked at several speedy linebackers in free agency to help offset the loss of veterans Na'il Diggs and Paris Lenon.
    Rasheed is built to play the weak-side position but probably would be a utility player. If the Packers are able to land Arrington they can play him at any of the two outside positions and would probably feel less inclined to draft a linebacker.

    With Arrington on board, it could mean they would pass on Ohio State linebacker A.J. Hawk for an offensive player like Maryland tight end Vernon Davis.
     
  2. gado35

    gado35 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    115
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good article, thanks. I do think it is important to note that, as the article said, arringtons second visit doesnt mean much to where he is going to sign as much as it does that he wants to get signed before the draft. I think Hawk would be a great pick, but i was watching some clips on Vernon Davis today and all i have to say is that that guy is a beast. He ran under a 4.38 at the combine. For a man his size that is sick. Not to mention great target for Favre. Arrington by himself may not be the difference maker of why favre would come back, but i do think by signing him things will unwind in a way that bring favre back.
     
  3. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    Well, if TT wants to PROVE he wants to win now, now is the time for him to SHOW it by signing Arrington before the Giants do. I have backed TT through this stuff, but he needs to get this done in my view. The Packers could then go after another good player in the draft if he did. Guess we will see.
     
  4. packedhouse01

    packedhouse01 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,560
    Ratings:
    +1
    There are several things here that need to be addressed. 1) we need an impact player. 2) we need a linebacker 3) we have the money to sign him

    So what's the problem TT? Get this guy signed.
     
  5. Bobby Roberts

    Bobby Roberts Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    770
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'd like for us to sign Arrington also, but there are many considerations to take. LaVar is looking for a fair market deal, but his contract demands are greater than the market is willing to pay.

    Reasons, the last couple of seasons have been very disappointing for him and he's had injury problems. He has done well in the past, but his most recent performances (the past 2 years) show a player who's not up to the same level from earlier in his career. Even so, he's seeking a contract on par with the someone at the same level as earlier in his career.

    In the end, this contract play is necessary to bring Arrington's contract demands down into his actual market value. I'd like to see TT sign him to a front loaded deal that pays a little more than what other teams are offering. He could be a great addition to our defense for many years, but he could also turn out to be a Joe Johnson type of bust.
     
  6. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Why isn't he signed, packedhouse? Perhaps because the draft is sending 2 and possibly 3 immediate starters at the LB position into the league. Hawk, Greenway, Sims and, possibly Hodge being a 4th.

    I would like to see Arrington sign, provided the team believes he fits in well into what they are trying to accomplish defensively. Remember, this defense is not flashy and depends upon assignment-sure players. The knock on Arrington is that his freelancing gives up the big play a little too often. But, if he does not sign, we can draft a starter.
     
  7. DakotaT

    DakotaT Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    810
    Ratings:
    +0
    Has anybody else heard a rumor on Lavar that he has deteriorating ligaments in one of his knees. I think the Giants brought him in yesterday for an MRI not just a physical. The Giants were rumored to have asked Arrington to come off his price. (For the record, I have no links or proof, just pure speculation).
     
  8. warhawk

    warhawk Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,922
    Ratings:
    +38
    What bothers me is the situation in Washington where he apparantly got in the dog house and wasn't on the field full time. Now, big time players sometimes get in the dog house, but usually if they are awesome football players, they play.
    For Washing ton to leave the guy on the sidelines as much as they did was either a huge sacrifice on their part, or, they didn't miss what he brought as much as you would think an impact player would be missed.

    I know the guy is good. But if he DOES come down to reality price wise it will also bring the other teams after him into play and will come down to where he wants to go.
     
  9. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    Didn't wanna start a new thread. DEAL WITH IT.



    from PFT.com
     
  10. kmac

    kmac Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    849
    Ratings:
    +0
    Wow.

    On a slightly related note, I hate the Postons.
     
  11. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    I dunno if I should be or not, but I'm surprised to see Arrington dumped.


    Think its worth it to pick him up? Could he be used as a pass rush specialist?
     
  12. Titletown088

    Titletown088 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'd be for signing him at a cheap cost. TT was interested in him last year, but that was before hawk came around..
     
  13. bozz_2006

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,576
    Ratings:
    +652
    if we get him on the cheap, my feelings toward the signing would best be described as, "meh".
     
  14. PackFanInSC

    PackFanInSC Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    563
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't know that he would be willing to be a back-up and the only spot that may have competition would be Poppinga. That would definitely mean Taylor would have to go -- Unless the Moss for Hodge + 3rd rumor had validity.

    Wouldn't hurt to bring him in for a look -- has same agent as Woodson and Favre tried to talk him into coming last year. How has his recovery gone?

    Our needs are really more on the offense and the defensive backfield. It could free up someone else to be traded for an established player to meet those needs but I would think that any contract would have to be based on incentives just in case he flops like he did this year.
     
  15. bozz_2006

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,576
    Ratings:
    +652
    exactly. and, contrary to what arrington may well be thinking, i doubt there are many teams who would sign him with the intention of playing him as a full-time starter at this point in his career.

    PS it's better to burn out than to fade away!
     
  16. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
  17. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    I wouldn't want him even. I'm happy with our LB's and I'm very happy with the potential they have. Also they really grew together this year. Signing Arrington in my opinion would be a waste of good cap space because the one position I feel strongly about is LB.
     
  18. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    Yeah, you're probably right.
     
  19. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    We have a great crop of LB's.
    I would ONLY get him if it was DIRT CHEAP.
     
  20. bozz_2006

    bozz_2006 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,576
    Ratings:
    +652
    i think it would probably be a bad idea to get him, because of all the reasons you guys said, he's damaged goods, and he has an ego that i believe would prevent him from being even a moderately effectively player in a situational role. he has such a chip on his shoulder that if he isn't treated like God's gift to football, which he believes he is, he won't play for ****.
     
  21. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    I'm on the fence with this.

    I think if he splits time with Poppinga and we can get him cheap I think it'd be a good idea.


    As someone mentioned though, his ego is large and I think part time play with low pay will not go over well with him.
     
  22. longtimefan

    longtimefan Super Moderator Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    17,837
    Ratings:
    +3,483
    he might not have any other choice tho???
     
  23. Since69

    Since69 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    422
    Ratings:
    +1
    Arrington will be happiest in a non-regimented scheme (maybe a 3-4) where he can just roam and make plays on his own. That's what he wanted to do in Washington, and that's what got him benched - he half-assed it in practice because he felt the scheme limited him. In fact, he took less money than we offered to play for the Giants because they told him he be allowed to freelance.

    Not a good fit for our system. Not at all.
     
  24. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    A key factor in him signging with the Giants was being able to go up against his former team twice a year.
     
  25. longtimefan

    longtimefan Super Moderator Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    17,837
    Ratings:
    +3,483
    and wasnt there a real good friend of his that played on the Giants as well?
     

Share This Page