1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

If I Were Ted Thompson...

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by JWalkRulz84, Feb 9, 2005.

  1. JWalkRulz84

    JWalkRulz84 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    21
    Ratings:
    +0
    These are the moves I would make through the draft. Im big on college football as well as the NFL and love to think what I would do if I were the GM, however I do not criticize decisions our GM's make simply because I know I couldnt do better...lol

    Well, here it goes...

    1) Let Mike Wahle Walk
    REASONING: He is just simply too expensive. Our O-Line will easily be able to hold its own without him and we have our future to look at as well with Green and Walker being upcoming free agents. We have plenty of promise with Barry and Wells that Wahle can go else where and we will be just fine.

    2) Re-Sign Marco Rivera
    REASONING: He is a leader on this team. Favre will be back and Rivera has said that he wants to retire with Brett. I believe with this scenario we might be able to get Rivera for the "Hometown Discount." This guy will be too hard to replace not only on the field, but in the locker room as well.

    3) Franchise Tag Franks
    REASONING: I know we dont use him very much and I know he will come a little bit more than we want to spend. HOWEVER, in order to be able to fill Franks' spot, we would have to sign someone like Mili who might be about a million dollars cheaper, HOWEVER, Franks is about 100% better than Mili. Franks does everything right and doesnt complain.

    4) Extend Walker & Green
    REASONING: These are our playmakers. And they will need to be our playmakers when Favre retires. We need to make sure these guys are in Green & Gold for life. They will help provide a foundation making it easier for a young QB to come in. Davenport cannot handle the load and I believe Green will be very valuable until he is about 33 years old.

    5) Re-Structure Sharper
    REASONING: Sharper is still very talented. He made some lightning plays last season and he doesnt deserve any more blame than anyone else on the defensive side. I think Bates will help put him in the right position and he will be much improved last season. He will be much like Rodney Harrison.

    6) Sign Bryce Fisher
    REASONING: This will be one of our few FA acquistions. I like Fisher and he fills the type of player Bates likes on the end. I do believe we can get him and he will help take a lot of pressure off KGB. He will also allow Kampman to become a situational player on either side if needed on running downs. Kampman will also be able to give these guys a breather allowing us to utilize a consistent pass rush, yet keeping an effective run defense.

    *We will not cut Cledtius Hunt. Bates said in his conference call that he believe he can motivate Hunt. Hopefully we see the Hunt of old.

    2005 NFL DRAFT
    *We trade our late 2nd Rounder & 1st Rounder to move up in the 1st Round

    1 - SS Thomas Davis
    REASONING: We need someone who can hit. A "Big Time" playmaker. This guy could be much like Sean Taylor. Im sick of watching team after team run crossing routes without their receivers getting punished. This guy would be well worth giving up a 2nd rounder.

    2 - MLB Kirk Morrison
    REASONING: A bit bigger than Barnett, and very fast. Another playmaker that will probably fall to the 2nd round because of the amount of talent in the 1st round. He is also capable of making an immediate impact.

    3 - G Claude Terrell
    REASONING: We will need some depth in our offensive line and we usually like to pick up at least one guy in the draft. We might have to draft someone a little higher this season simply because we might face injuries and will need someone to step up.

    4 - RB Marion Barber
    REASONING: I think we should not re-sign Davenport. Put a low tender on him. Barber is a very talented back and can take a lot of pressure off Green.

    5 - CB Scott Starks
    REASONING: He is small, but is known for his ball skills and has a nose for the big play. He could be a "Diamond in the Rough" type player and can also compete for the nickle position, possibly even a starting position.

    6 - QB Bryan Randall
    REASONING: A fast, strong armed QB that with the right tutoring, could have the tools to be a very good quarterback. With good weapons around him, he could be much like a faster, more accurate Donovan McNabb.

    7. WR Chad Owens
    REASONING: Chatman is not a very good punt returner. His skills are improving at receiver, HOWEVER, Owens has a lot more potential at more positions.

    2005 Potential Depth Chart
    QB - Brett Favre, Craig Nall, Bryan Randall
    RB - Ahman Green, Marion Barber, Tony Fisher
    WR - Javon Walker, Donald Driver, Robert Ferguson, Chad Owens
    TE - Bubba Franks, Ben Steele
    LT - Chad Clifton, Brad Bedell
    LG - Scott Wells, Claude Terrell
    C - Mike Flanagan, Grey Ruegamer
    RG - Marco Rivera, Steve Morley
    RT - Mark Tausher, Kevin Barry

    DE - Kabeer Gbaja Biamilla, Aaron Kampman, Corey Williams
    DE - Bryce Fisher, R-Kal Truluck, Kenny Peterson
    DT - Cledtius Hunt, Donnell Washington, Cullen Jenkins
    NT - Grady Jackson, James Lee
    WLB - Nick Barnett, Paris Lenon
    MLB - Kirk Morrison, Torrance Marshall
    SLB - Na'il Diggs, FREE AGENCY
    CB - Al Harris, Joey Thomas
    CB - Ahmad Carroll, Scott Starks
    FS - Darren Sharper, Michael Hawthorne (Moved to safety)
    SS - Thomas Davis, Mark Roman

    This would give us a very good defense with only 1 Free Agency move. Just the way Thompson likes to do it.
     
  2. monkeyracer43

    monkeyracer43 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    74
    Ratings:
    +0
    I have a feeling Kirk Morrison will go in the first round. With his size and athleticism, i don't think he'll make it into the second round. I would also like to see the Packers pick up a QB in the second or third round to prepare for the post Favre era. Although, if the Packers traded one of their second round picks to get Thomas Davis, I wouldn't complain. We could use someone like him to anchor the secondary.
     
  3. packer4ever

    packer4ever Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    153
    Ratings:
    +0
    Nice post Jwalk Sounds good to me. Just one question. You don't have a punter in your draft picks which round are you going to take a punter? Ha Ha
     
  4. eastcoastpacker

    eastcoastpacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Messages:
    484
    Ratings:
    +1
    Just draft for defense!!! In the last couple of rounds, get some ol. No need to get a QB this year,Nall will do ok.
     
  5. TOPackerFan

    TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,084
    Ratings:
    +0
    I have a tough time thinking we'll be able to move far enough up to get Thomas Davis with only one extra pick (but if we could do it I make that trade in a second). Unless a DE like Pollack, Roth or Tuck falls to us at #24, I think we should trade down and stockpile some picks. I also think Safety can be addressed by picking up Shazor (if we trade down to the upper part of the second) and Brimmer (with our late second round pick and if we release Sharper). We can also get a guy like Rudd probably with our higher second round pick.
     
  6. sixone220

    sixone220 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    688
    Ratings:
    +1
    i wouldn't say the OL will EASILY be able to do without wahle.

    i don't pay a ton of attention to barber but i didn't think he was coming out.

    as a tech fan, i love randall but i don't see them dumping jt.
     
  7. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think Roman should be dropped, he has turned out to be a failed project..
     
  8. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    Looks good, but we need more than four receivers and we need a KR/PR :)
     
  9. JWalkRulz84

    JWalkRulz84 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    21
    Ratings:
    +0
    Thats why I drafted WR Chad Owens from Hawaii...

    That way we will have Walker, Driver, Ferguson, Owens, Chatman

    And I think Owens would be better suited as KR/PR
     
  10. IPBprez

    IPBprez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,883
    Ratings:
    +5
    What's everyone think of Kevin Burnett, or Marlon Jackson being available when the Pack gets their turn?
     
  11. JWalkRulz84

    JWalkRulz84 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    21
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think Marlin Jackson is overrated a little bit. Good Michigan players seem to get overhyped around draft time because Michigan is always a good team, however for some reason it never seems like first round Michigan players seem to pan our and always have some sort of problem...Tim Biakabatuka, David Terrell, Charles Woodson (cancer?). I know that was the past, however right now, I just wouldn't put any trust in to a player like Marlin Jackson until the 2nd round...

    I think Burnett is solid. However, with teams like Cleveland, Seattle, New Orleans, and Minnesota all picking in front of us with the same problems as us, its tough to think that Burnett is going to fall to us. I would love to have Burnett though. I would love to have Channing Crowder even more. This defense lacks "Playmakers." Those are the type of players I want to see playing for us instead of against us.
     
  12. mattresell

    mattresell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Ratings:
    +0
    I like all these ideas. I'm still not sure who's going to be available for us. I guess we need to wait until the combine to get a better idea of who's moving up or down. I personally want to draft a DE with the first pick, but any playmaker on defense would be good. Im also not a fan of trading up as suggested previously. I don't think the talent between the 10th pick and the 25th justifies giving up a scond rounder. Plus top picks get top contracts. Just a thought. I've always thought that defense was the way to go, but has anyone thought of letting Rivera AND Wahle walk and then drafting David Baas. We'd still have a 2nd rounder for defense and QB(we can't wait another year, Nall isn't the long term answer). Plus that would free up more money in free agency. Just a thought.
     
  13. Packersfan43084

    Packersfan43084 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    295
    Ratings:
    +0
    What about Ahmad Brooks. Is he draft eligible?
     
  14. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8

    Didn't see him on the depth chart layout you provided of I assume a 53 man roster?
     
  15. mattresell

    mattresell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ahmad Brooks decided to stay in VA for one more year. Barring injury he should be a top ten pick next draft.
     
  16. arrowgargantuan

    arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,645
    Ratings:
    +4

    here:


     
  17. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    That's still only four WR on the Depth Chart.
     
  18. arrowgargantuan

    arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,645
    Ratings:
    +4
    just pointing out chad for you guy.
     
  19. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    Yup, thanks. I seen him, I only see four WR though an now I'm confused cuz I thought he said previously five. Bah, its too dang early!!
     

Share This Page