Well Forget Favre, I said I was done with this but since you addressed me, I'll answer. Can you name the posters who are "acting like this is the worst team ever in the history of football"? Can you name even one? I ask this to make a point but also because of the number of posts on this forum there is no way I have seen even most of them and I might have missed this cabal of posters you're talking about. Could it be that you view any criticism as inappropriate after a win, and you are exaggerating the point of view of those posting criticism? BTW, how do you deal with criticism offered by Packers themselves, like Woodson even after a win?
If a Packers fan is concerned about an area of the team why is it only appropriate for him/her to express that concern after a loss? Aren't we all eager to see the Packers repeat and isn't it legitimate for Packers fans to express a concern they have with the team that may prevent them from repeating? Even if they win that week's game? For example what if during a win the Packers give up 170 yards on three KORs? Why wouldn't it be appropriate for a poster to question the players and coaches regarding the KOR team - even if the team was in the middle of an historic 15 game winning streak? And if you are concerned about someone complaining about any subject without acknowledging any positives about that topic, you are free to express those positive attributes. That would make the point you want to convey, wouldn't it?
Who acted like a poster shouldn't have the right to use the ignore feature? If you think I did, read the second sentence of my post again. Nowhere did I say or imply someone else doesn't have the right to use ignore. I just posted I never have.
Why are fans getting so hot headed when they win? Well, that was one of the points I made in the post you quoted. Perhaps one of the reasons is when some do, they are supported by others. For example you chimed in, in apparent support of a poster who posted that DevilDon was not a true Packers fan or even a football fan and was less than civil toward another poster. Look this isn't that important. I realize I am not a moderator and that I've already spent too much time on it. But IMO it benefits the board when posters are civil to each other, even while disagreeing with each other and even if their disagreement is vehement. As I said and as you agree, if we can't be civil during this winning streak, when could we?