tynimiller
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,410
- Reaction score
- 5,157
You didn’t give him the reigns to anything though…you handed him a strand of twine, tied around a fowl that was just born and the momma left before it was weened. LOL
Maybe the punter? He seems to be out there every 4th offensive snap.It is almost right now apparently that we need a veteran at TE and a veteran at WR just to school these younger guys and give them some confidence. It would even help Love. It will not solve all the problems. Right now I would say No One on our offense can make the Pro Bowl
Last year with better offensive talent they went 8 and 9 and 21.7 points a game and missed playoffs..majority of people blaming everyone but Rodgers.You didn’t give him the reigns to anything though…you handed him a strand of twine, tied around a fowl that was just born and the momma left before it was weened. LOL
Not necessarily them. But even Jimmy Graham can catch a ball right to him and you will not outright him gor a pass.I would kill to have Lazard and Lewis back.
Not necessarily them. But even Jimmy Graham can catch a ball right to him and you will not outright him gor a pass.
Too many 3 WR sets imo. That position group and the TE's are the weakest positions on the team. LaFleur needs to establish the running game even if it means showing 6 OL looks early in the game and keep the yard marker moving forward to keep Love in manageable situations and control field position and clock. After the first three games he's gotten much worse at this aspect of game management imo. He's letting games get away from him. In his defense, his veteran players haven't done him any favors either. They've been mucking things up on both sides of the ball far too much. Actually, the special teams play has for the most part looked more professional than any other aspect of this team. Kudos to Bisaccia.How would you respond?
Frankly, considering the offensive woes (which I think we all expected before the season ever started) the defense hasn't been that bad.Too many 3 WR sets imo. That position group and the TE's are the weakest positions on the team. LaFleur needs to establish the running game even if it means showing 6 OL looks early in the game and keep the yard marker moving forward to keep Love in manageable situations and control field position and clock. After the first three games he's gotten much worse at this aspect of game management imo. He's letting games get away from him. In his defense, his veteran players haven't done him any favors either. They've been mucking things up on both sides of the ball far too much. Actually, the special teams play has for the most part looked more professional than any other aspect of this team. Kudos to Bisaccia.
agree as a whole. But the injuries to Campbell and Alexander and Gary's limited snap count has kept them from being a stellar unit. The stupid penalties from veterans hasn't helped matters any.Frankly, considering the offensive woes (which I think we all expected before the season ever started) the defense hasn't been that bad.
Jordan hasn't played well..Last year with better offensive talent they went 8 and 9 and 21.7 points a game and missed playoffs..majority of people blaming everyone but Rodgers.
This year. Majority blaming Love
We have an OL that failed to even chuck the nose tackle let alone block him. That's the running game you want?LaFleur needs to establish the running game
That would be one great step for PackerKind.My desire for veteran has nothing to do with the point of catch, but EVERYTHING to do all the week before the game and knowing the dang plays.
What does that mean to you, being "groomed and ready to go?" We drafted a late-1st round QB in Love. We knew that he wasn't ready to play his rookie year. To me the "groomed" part is that he knows the playbook and isn't intimidated by the game. Were you expecting more?The whole point of drafting Love when we did was so that he would be groomed and ready to take over the reigns once Rodgers was gone.
Exactly. We saw QBs who were farther up the curve when they were in year 1 or 2. E.GWhat does that mean to you, being "groomed and ready to go?" We drafted a late-1st round QB in Love. We knew that he wasn't ready to play his rookie year. To me the "groomed" part is that he knows the playbook and isn't intimidated by the game. Were you expecting more?
I think that he was ready to play this year. He knows the offense but now has to learn how to put it all together with the tools that he has around him. We did not draft CJ Stroud. This is about what I expected in his first year of playing. Yes I hoped for more growth by this point, but I certainly felt like this could be an ugly year.
Some might say that MLF has established that the run game is nonexistant.We have an OL that failed to even chuck the nose tackle let alone block him. That's the running game you want?
When we made the conscious decision to eschew investing and making a push to go all-in on the tail-end of Rodgers’ prime for favor of trading up to draft a guy many had labeled as a “project” QB, I expected that after three years of “development” he wouldn’t be in the conversation for “worst QBs in the league” after half a season.What does that mean to you, being "groomed and ready to go?" We drafted a late-1st round QB in Love. We knew that he wasn't ready to play his rookie year. To me the "groomed" part is that he knows the playbook and isn't intimidated by the game. Were you expecting more?
I think that he was ready to play this year. He knows the offense but now has to learn how to put it all together with the tools that he has around him. We did not draft CJ Stroud. This is about what I expected in his first year of playing. Yes I hoped for more growth by this point, but I certainly felt like this could be an ugly year.
Yes it’s not so much about the “price” but rather the “intent” if that makes sense.To be fair in the world of draft equity the trade up to get him really wasn't a massive one.
I say that because I still remember just absolutely blowing up the shoutbox at the time and my text groups with HOW CHEAP we'd just traded for Michael Pittman - who was my #1 WR in that class. I was baffled at how cheap it was IMO.
And I know you had to see thar play which Jonathan Vilma hollered about yesterday. 3rd and 1 and no one blocks the nose tackle at all. I mean do you even have to coach that? That is a given even before HS football. And the nose tackle had to be surprised. A couple years ago I saw that on one of Crosby's FG tries in KC. It was like door's open come on in. Cost us 3 big points in a close game.Some might say that MLF has established that the run game is nonexistant.
Hof Kurt Warner hasn’t said he is worse. even rodgers hasn’t said thatWhen we made the conscious decision to eschew investing and making a push to go all-in on the tail-end of Rodgers’ prime for favor of trading up to draft a guy many had labeled as a “project” QB, I expected that after three years of “development” he wouldn’t be in the conversation for “worst QBs in the league” after half a season.
Maybe that makes me unrealistic or naive or just spoiled by success, but yeah, I expected more (and if we’re being honest I think Gute and co tried to sell us on “more,” too)
Yes, that’s a perfectly valid opinion to hold.Hof Kurt Warner hasn’t said he is worse. even rodgers hasn’t said that
colon cowherd isn’t a viable trust or a ton of the others
ill go by what nfl qb say
I’m going to defend Love. Not just because he’s a Packer. Of course I want him to do well but I’m not basing my opinion as a whole on that. I watched Trevor Lawrence coming in as an Heisman Trophy candidate. He was dominant in his 40 College starts. Yet the NFL is another animal. No amount of book study can prepare you for live game action.And now somehow that narrative has shifted from “he’ll sit for a few years and develop” to “he hasn’t played that many actually games so he’s basically a rookie still and needs time” or whatever.