I don't know exactly what grade I'd give it but I can't complain too much so far.
Given the assessment that we had 6ish WR prospects graded as 1st-round prospects, with the way things fell I'm okay that we didn't get one in R1. I have a hunch - nothing to prove this, just speculating - but I'd bet that out of those 6 1st-rd graded WRs there were probably only 2 or 3 that they would've been willing to move up for. If I had to guess, Wilson, London, Williams. I think they would've taken Burks, Dotson, Olave in the first but probably didn't rate them worth moving up for...and by the same merit, looking at what it would've cost to get in to the range that Wilson/London/Williams (and Olave) were drafted, it would've been really steep.
I'm happy with Walker and Wyatt. If we still had last year's WR room (Davante, MVS) I'd go so far as to say that it would have been an A+ first round. Obviously that's not the case, those guys are gone, so that need is greater, but when looking beyond just 'need' I think we did quite well.
I think probably the only two complaints I could make is that *maybe* it was a bit high for Walker - but of course we saw Dean fall a long way. Maybe you could question if Walker was a better choice than Lloyd. And you could probably say we overpaid to get Watson, but at the same time... a lot of WRs ended up going before our original first day-two pick, so we were probably going to need to move up to get one of our top-graded guys one way or another. Maybe not as high as 34, maybe not giving up so much, but I don't think we get one of our preferred players if we stay pat at 53.
Rhyan I'm really happy with too. I think that pick's both a great value and fills need.
So I don't know, maybe call it like a B+, A-?