OldSchool101
Pack
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 21,084
- Reaction score
- 10,852
Daniel Jerimiah Top 150 list at #82 overall
Good program. Does he fit since we move back to a 3-4? You know he will get PT.Daniel Jerimiah Top 150 list at #82 overall
I don’t know much about him but Good thick size as 6’4.0” 313Lb with nice 34” arms and 11” Club handsGood program. Does he fit since we move back to a 3-4? You know he will get PT.
Mizzou has been known to sneak a few DL surprises. 9ers had one years back.I don’t know much about him but Good thick size as 6’4.0” 313Lb with nice 34” arms and 11” Club hands
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
There are 2 sources that I really trust. CBS has been routinely accurate across drafts going back the last decade or so. They’ve got McClellan at #80.Mizzou has been known to sneak a few DL surprises. 9ers had one years back.
See I see him as a cross mix between Kenny Clark and Big Mike (but a taller version). Meaning he moves like Big Mike Daniels but is closer in size to Kenny.Glibert Brown clone...big body.
Good analogy. Gilbert was shorter.See I see him as a cross mix between Kenny Clark and Big Mike (but a taller version). Meaning he moves like Big Mike Daniels but is closer in size to Kenny.
Daniel Jeremiah had 83 out of his top 100 guys, drafted in the First 100 picks.There are 2 sources that I really trust. CBS has been routinely accurate across drafts going back the last decade or so. They’ve got McClellan at #80.
Daniel Jeremiah with NFL (I’ll admit I’m partial to his Father David Jeremiah as he’s a s top 5 national pastor imo and I listen to dozens). Jeremiah is very knowledgeable also. Both sources are 2 picks apart at #80 and #82 and we were scheduled at #84 and leapfrogged the NFC to get him. What’s the chances.
Yeah. That's goodDaniel Jeremiah had 83 out of his top 100 guys, drafted in the First 100 picks.
Our own @tynimiller had 76 out of 100 That's pretty good! Nice job Tyni!
I think he fits eventually as a rookie maybe not right away. He's about 6'4 313. I think to make him that third DT and make him effective he has to hit 325-330. He would've been a great fit last year in a 4-3.Good program. Does he fit since we move back to a 3-4? You know he will get PT.
McClellan says he can play anywhere the Packers want him, nose to 5TI think he fits eventually as a rookie maybe not right away. He's about 6'4 313. I think to make him that third DT and make him effective he has to hit 325-330. He would've been a great fit last year in a 4-3.
I believe it. I'm only worried about sizeMcClellan says he can play anywhere the Packers want him, nose to 5T
So what I’m reading is he’s mostly recently been between 313-322Lb.I think he fits eventually as a rookie maybe not right away. He's about 6'4 313. I think to make him that third DT and make him effective he has to hit 325-330. He would've been a great fit last year in a 4-3.
For hard numbers I generally trust ESPN because I know high schools and also colleges make guys bigger to make the guy look better. At 313 I was more wondering if he was a Mike Daniels type small-ish guy that can split double teams and damn near steal the handoff. Or on a first and 10 from the 3 yard line was he gonna get blocked clear back to mid field, like what happens to some D-Linemen.So what I’m reading is he’s mostly recently been between 313-322Lb.
My guess is for combine these guys trim down to test better at Combine.
As far as 4-3 you are correct. Although as I dig deeper the common scouting reports put him as a 2-Down Run stopping 1 Tech. His length is extraordinary. 1/2” shy of 7 Feet Span. Great 34” arms. Does need some help with technique to improve, but that’s normal outside of a Top 50 ranked guy.
Sure. Although Big Mike was only like 6’0.5” where Chris is 6’3.6”. Chris is slightly taller than Kenny Clark and exact same weightFor hard numbers I generally trust ESPN because I know high schools and also colleges make guys bigger to make the guy look better. At 313 I was more wondering if he was a Mike Daniels type small-ish guy that can split double teams and damn near steal the handoff. Or on a first and 10 from the 3 yard line was he gonna get blocked clear back to mid field, like what happens to some D-Linemen.
It is crazy how big players are today compared to a generation ago when 313 is now considered "light" for a DT. lolFor hard numbers I generally trust ESPN because I know high schools and also colleges make guys bigger to make the guy look better. At 313 I was more wondering if he was a Mike Daniels type small-ish guy that can split double teams and damn near steal the handoff. Or on a first and 10 from the 3 yard line was he gonna get blocked clear back to mid field, like what happens to some D-Linemen.
Practically a Featherweight classIt is crazy how big players are today compared to a generation ago when 313 is now considered "light" for a DT. lol
Back then when a DT carried the higher weight it was less muscle and more pasta. That is why many have more speed and strength today even with the weight.It is crazy how big players are today compared to a generation ago when 313 is now considered "light" for a DT. lol