Anubis
Cheesehead
Good riddance.
Good question. I was wondering the same thing. Any legal experts here? :feedback: :beersign:Heres what i don't get.............WHY does it take till December to announce the punishment? Are they hoping everyone will forget about it, so they can just slap him on the wrists???
I mean........the guy admitted guilt! Why not just sentence him NOW!??
(I don't think he will ever play in the NFL......but he might get a CFL offer)
Good question. I was wondering the same thing. Any legal experts here? :feedback: :beersign:cheesey said:Heres what i don't get.............WHY does it take till December to announce the punishment? Are they hoping everyone will forget about it, so they can just slap him on the wrists???
I mean........the guy admitted guilt! Why not just sentence him NOW!??
(I don't think he will ever play in the NFL......but he might get a CFL offer)
Like, wow......i like, never like, thought of it like, that way.MidwestFavreFan said:Good question. I was wondering the same thing. Any legal experts here? :feedback: :beersign:cheesey said:Heres what i don't get.............WHY does it take till December to announce the punishment? Are they hoping everyone will forget about it, so they can just slap him on the wrists???
I mean........the guy admitted guilt! Why not just sentence him NOW!??
(I don't think he will ever play in the NFL......but he might get a CFL offer)
I am not a legal expert....however I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once.
My guess is that the Judge now must review other "like" cases to determine where, on the penalty matrix, Vick's crimes fall. It is important that the Judge be consistant with previous like cases. He then takes in the "unique" circumstances of this particular case and sentenences appropriately.
Keep in mind, regardless of your feelings for Vick, we are talking about how long a person must pay for his crime.....by taking away the very root of this country's value, one's freedom. not to be taken lightly or quickly.
HUMANE SOCIETY HAS NOTES FROM VICK'S NOTES-LESS SPEECH?
Plenty of the sock puppets out there found the August 27 apology offered up by Mike Vick to be convincing because it was delivered without notes. As if liars never speak extemporaneously.
Well, anyone who believes that Vick performed well because he performed without written cues might need to rethink their position on this one.
The Humane Society claims that Vick used notes, because it claims that it has them (hat tip to MDS). Because Vick apparently left the notes behind at the podium after he spoke. Oh, and the Humane Society is selling the notes on eBay.
Several PFT readers wrote last week to express their belief that Vick had notes of some kind. Then again, several others thought that he was getting Cyrano-style assistance via an earpiece.
We didn't care all that much about it. He said what he said. We're not sure that what he said would have been that much different if he'd been reading from a script.
Besides, we've got a feeling that folks who are inclined to believe that Vick's apology was genuine and/or credible simply because he didn't have notes will respond to this development by saying that the notes he had weren't very detailed.
The bigger issue here, as we see it, is why did Vick leave the notes behind? Surely, the goal was to create the appearance that he was talking without a net, so that folks would conclude that he was speaking "from the heart" and therefore "telling the truth."
I know! Thats how I felt!I read that transcript from "The View" - apparently dog-fighting is ok since it's "socially acceptable" in "that part of the country"
Sure hope they don't have any other felonious "socially acceptable" practices such as murder or assault...
To me Vick is worse, because he tortured animals as well as betting on which one would die.If he is allowed to come back then pete rose should be inducted into the hall of fame. Different sport and different type of gambling but still same basic principal