- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 2
Don't let him into the Packers HoF? Seriously?
** I took out the LEGALLY wrong statement**
longtimefan
Dont do it again
** I took out the LEGALLY wrong statement**
longtimefan
Dont do it again
Mark Chmura should never have been put in the Packer HOF. I'm ashamed they did that as a Packer fan.
Don't retire the #4 jersey. Give it to the punter every year. I don't want Favre to be in the Packers hall of fame. The Packers hall of fame goes to players who actually respect the Packers, not players who spit in their old team's face.
My guess is that when he enters the HoF, all these Packer fans with sandy vaginal cavities will all of a sudden feel better.
As far as jersey retirement, I could see it happening at the soonest ...
I agree with John L, it should happen soon.
I think the Packers should definitely retire #4. They should just find some scrub player from the 60s or something that wore #4 and retire that guy's jersey. That would really stick it to the sexter if his number is retired, but it's not his name on the jersey. lol
I think the Packers should definitely retire #4. They should just find some scrub player from the 60s or something that wore #4 and retire that guy's jersey. That would really stick it to the sexter if his number is retired, but it's not his name on the jersey. lol
the only thing chmura is guilty of is being an idiot, a hypocrite, and being a bad husband. But child molester? Nah thats a little far. Personally he is my least favorite packer (the former QB is a viking and always will be in my eyes) as he is pompous jerk if you meet him. Like total opposite of the Majik man.
But yeah I would of had no problem not putting him in the packer HOF. He was even that great either. Numbers wise he is pretty similar to Donald Lee.
I think if they did it in 20 yrs he would still hear boos.
ivo, have you met Brent?
Just because he was found "not guilty" doesn't mean he didn't do it. It just means that there may not have been enough evidence to convict or that the jury isn't convinced that he did it.Chmura. Not Guilty. Period.
On April 8, 2000 Chmura was accused of having sex at a Waukesha Catholic Memorial High School party with the then 17-year-old babysitter of his children. Chmura was tried but found not guilty of all charges.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Chmura#cite_note-3 Two days after being acquitted of child enticement and third-degree ****** assault, Chmura acknowledged that his behavior at a post-prom party "wasn't something a married man should do."
I don't like the situation and spotlight he put himself, his family and his team in. But being found not guilty by a group of his peers. He's good in my book. At least he isn't Lawrence Taylor... LT paid his 'babysitter' $300.
~Valhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Chmura#cite_note-4
After the beatings he took and the injuries and one of, if not the, worst seasons of his career, I seriously doubt he'll be back.As for Favre's supposed "official" retirement, don't count on it. He's said that for the last 4 years, us Packer fans know that better than anyone. So don't be surprised to hear that he's discovered some magic berry over the summer and it's rejuvenated him so he can take some team to the SB. Favre has established a pattern. I know we all hope he retires as I'm sure even some non-Packers fans do, but haven't we all heard this song before?
They wouldn't do that. It's not following the tradition of the NFL to retire numbers of top players.I think the Packers should definitely retire #4. They should just find some scrub player from the 60s or something that wore #4 and retire that guy's jersey. That would really stick it to the sexter if his number is retired, but it's not his name on the jersey. lol
Yes. If he was found not guilty, it DOES mean he didn't do it. The lack of evidence equates to innocency.Just because he was found "not guilty" doesn't mean he didn't do it. It just means that there may not have been enough evidence to convict or that the jury isn't convinced that he did it.
I doubt that any of us was there, so who are we to judge who did or didn't do what to whom?
I edited out a post that was legally not correct in eyes of the law
I also deleted greenandgold's post as it quoted said post..
His post is not fully gone. It was soft deleted and can be restored at anytime robdog sees fit
If anyone has an issue with those actions contact Rob
Just heed this warning...I dont want to see someone say Chewy was a child molester, as he was found not guilty.
I'm not up to par with the case, but I believe he was found not guilty due to lack of convicting evidence.Not at all true. Not guilty simply means the legal system did not convict him. It has nothing to do with whether he did it or not