If we could only draft 1 position...what would it be?

OldSchoolFan

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
792
Reaction score
306
Location
Iowa
I say the lack of a premium running back (ala AP,Michael Turner or even someone like LaDanlian Thomlinson) is all the Packers need to put them over the top for a long, long time.

Not a Free Agent, but some young stud in the draft.

Yea, I think we are one player / position away from a dynasty.

What say you?
 

PackAttackUK

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Messages
689
Reaction score
26
Location
Liverpool, UK
It's a tough question to answer. If it was added in that no player would retire/get traded/become a free agent etc, then I think I might just agree with you, that an elite RB would put us over the top.
 

Murgen

MechaPackzilla
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
565
Location
Dallas
Offensive lineman. Without a line to open holes, having a great running-back isn't going to do much.
 
OP
OP
OldSchoolFan

OldSchoolFan

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
792
Reaction score
306
Location
Iowa
Offensive lineman. Without a line to open holes, having a great running-back isn't going to do much.

But when I think of the queenies and the Falcon's and the Jets, I don't think of them having a great offensive line...at the best I would say just adequate.
 

YouFrgotPoland

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
358
Reaction score
67
O-line. Pack isn't gonna spend a high draft pick on a RB, they are going to try and develop Starks. That's my opinion at least. Aaron Rodgers is the center of this team, so protecting him is key.
 

PackersRS

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
8,450
Reaction score
969
Location
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Another offensive linemen.

If Bulaga pans out on the left, with Sitton, and another elite guy in there, we'll win a SB every 3 years or so.

But the guy needs to be really good, good enough to learn on his own, as we don't have anyone teaching these guys...
 

Jordyruns

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
436
Reaction score
41
Location
Upstate NY
But when I think of the queenies and the Falcon's and the Jets, I don't think of them having a great offensive line...at the best I would say just adequate.

The vikings had a very good line in petersons early years and it has aged since. Not sure about the falcons probably middle of the road but the jets have an amazing o-line that is their key to a good running game. Last year they had 3 guys in the pro-bowl. I think 2 started not sure though.

I also look at three other examples here, the first is the seahawks in 05 or whatever year it was that alexander went off on the record book. Alexander was nothing close to that good he just had like the greatest offensive line ever. That line and those holes made him that good. The other examples I think of are two teams the patriots who never have a great run game but always have a great line. The other is the broncos who use to produce 1000 yard rushers every year. The only consistency they had was the o-line. Both of these teams, especially the patriots, still seemed to win and produced in each case a very dominate period.

Besides all of this grant really is not that bad and starks and kuhn are solid backup tandem.
 

Wood Chipper

Fantasy Football Guru
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
4,180
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Virginia
well if you want a franchise changing player then i would say a rb. but honestly we need o-linemen. with a good o-line we can make any rb look good
 

ivo610

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
16,588
Reaction score
2,250
Location
Madison
But when I think of the queenies and the Falcon's and the Jets, I don't think of them having a great offensive line...at the best I would say just adequate.

According to the offensive hogs rankings, in 2010 the Vikings had the 22nd ranked O line, the Falcons came in 5th and the Jets 6th.
 

DevilDon

Inclement Weather Fan
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
1,393
Reaction score
268
I wouldn't hesitate for a second to grab another OT. Detroit has a killer D-line and Chicago has Peppers, we need to protect Aaron and get a push for a RB. I still think Starks has huge potential. He is a franchise back imo.
BPA then as long as he's a tackle.
I also think we might get a 2nd for Matt Flynn and then things get real interesting. Still no RB for me, look for another CB
 

vancouverpackerfan

Cheesehead
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
85
Reaction score
16
Get some offensive lineman and the rest will take care of itself. Protect Rodgers and develop the RBs we have and you will get a balanced attack. Kuhn is an animal and will develop well with the right backfield. The pieces are alredy in place, just need the coaches to realize it and move in that direction.
 

Veretax

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
637
Reaction score
11
I want to say RB, but I feel we are lacking on OL, either a Guard or a Tackle.
 

Incubes12

Bay Harbor Butcher?
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
316
Location
Buffalo, NY
I want to say RB, but I feel we are lacking on OL, either a Guard or a Tackle.

I like Starks, from what little I've seen of him. I can almost guarantee that if we upgrade the OL, ALL of our running backs would improve. Even BJax might get an extra yard or two.
 

missinghoagies

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
66
Reaction score
14
A run grating, nasty OG would be great, A Steve Hutchinson type, however if there was a Marshal Falk talent available(the do it all back/match-up nightmare) would push this offense to heights rarely seen...only if they grew on trees:)
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Top