Welcome to our forum.Go Seahawks
I'm usually nice to start with but in your case, I'm willing to make an exception.
Don't troll to hard. You really won't last long here.
Welcome to our forum.Go Seahawks
Welcome to our forum.
I'm usually nice to start with but in your case, I'm willing to make an exception.
Don't troll to hard. You really won't last long here.
The Romo hate is weird because it's just not true. Rodgers is better than Romo (enough posters get insecure about praising other players that it becomes necessary to mention this up front). That said, Romo has more comeback wins since he entered the league than any other QB.
Outside of 2012, he has thrown 10 or fewer interceptions in every season since 2009 (though in 2010 he did manage 7 picks in 6 games). Just because Dallas finds ways to lose doesn't mean it's Romo's fault.
My Mother.Who told you you were nice ???
Dallas is good enough to beat any team left. I don't think they are better, but there are more than capable of beating any of them. If GB plays it's game, they'll win. Don't give Dallas a window to make things difficult.
Stop crying.
You forgot to say "and have a nice day".He has been a polite visitor on our forum, please be the same, or your visit will be a short one. Thank you.
You forgot to say "and have a nice day".
Stop crying.
they aren't good enough to beat ANY team? so is the Packers lol
While the game is still meaningful (until the Pack has a 17 pt. cushion in the 4th qtr) Capers will NOT have any less than 5 in the box, and probably 6 or 7. Stopping the run IS that important, and Capers knows it won't be done with 3 or 4 up front. Love your optimism, but you're not winning over any of us J8 ~ GB has more offensive weapons and a better D.
Packers 38 - Cowboys 27 (only because of a late garbage-time Dallas TD)
IMO the commonly accepted meaning of the term “weapons” refers to skill players, not linemen. Still the Cowboys have a definite advantage at TE and Bryant is very, very good. And stat wise, the teams are separated on offense by about one point per game in the regular season. (BTW, I like that you refer to the team you follow as the “Cows”.)Now saying that Green Bay has MORE offensive weapons than Dallas is a ridiculous statement.. Dallas has three pro bowlers on their offensive line, a qb who is close to rogers this year, better receivers as a unit (especially tight end)... You gotta be kidding me man.. The ratings say that the Packers and Cows are basically tied in regards to stats...
I’m not sure what stats you are looking at with regard to the defenses. This is from my post, number 151 on this thread: Here are the stats. The Cowboy’s ranking appears first, then the Packers.I also don't see how the Packers defense is better? The cowboys rank higher on defense but not by much...
The vast majority of those comeback wins were against teams with losing records...in other words, they shouldn't have been in a position of having to come back against those teams...and yes, Romo always seems to find a way to fumble or throw a pick at crucial times of games...
He actually didn't look too bad against Detroit. You do know he is from Burlington, WI., right?
they aren't good enough to beat ANY team? so is the Packers lol
2004-2014 4th qtr comeback wins (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/comebacks_career.htm):
Eli Manning - 26
Ben Roethlisberger - 25
Tony Romo - 24
Peyton Manning - 21
Drew Brees - 20
Tom Brady - 18
For his career, Romo has 110 INTs on 4,210 attempts. That's 1 INT for every 38.3 pass attempts.
For comparison (same order as above):
Eli Manning - 185 on 5,609 - 1 every 30.3
Ben Roethlisberger - 131 on 4,954 - 1 every 37.8
Tony Romo - 110 on 4,210 - 1 every 38.3
Peyton Manning - 234 on 9,049 - 1 every 38.7
Drew Brees - 194 on 7,458 - 1 every 38.4
Tom Brady - 134 on 7,168 - 1 every 53.5
There seems to be a correlation between frequency of INTs and number of comeback wins.
Now saying that Green Bay has MORE offensive weapons than Dallas is a ridiculous statement.. Dallas has three pro bowlers on their offensive line, a qb who is close to rogers this year, better receivers as a unit (especially tight end)... You gotta be kidding me man.. The ratings say that the Packers and Cows are basically tied in regards to stats... I also don't see how the Packers defense is better? The cowboys rank higher on defense but not by much...
Just by looking at all the stats, they're evenly matched, but the one thing that really stands out to me is does GB even have a tight end? I got tired of scrolling down the stats to find him...
Now saying that Green Bay has MORE offensive weapons than Dallas is a ridiculous statement.. Dallas has three pro bowlers on their offensive line, a qb who is close to rogers this year, better receivers as a unit (especially tight end)... You gotta be kidding me man.. The ratings say that the Packers and Cows are basically tied in regards to stats... I also don't see how the Packers defense is better? The cowboys rank higher on defense but not by much...
Just by looking at all the stats, they're evenly matched, but the one thing that really stands out to me is does GB even have a tight end? I got tired of scrolling down the stats to find him...
2004-2014 4th qtr comeback wins (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/comebacks_career.htm):
Eli Manning - 26
Ben Roethlisberger - 25
Tony Romo - 24
Peyton Manning - 21
Drew Brees - 20
Tom Brady - 18
For his career, Romo has 110 INTs on 4,210 attempts. That's 1 INT for every 38.3 pass attempts.
For comparison (same order as above):
Eli Manning - 185 on 5,609 - 1 every 30.3
Ben Roethlisberger - 131 on 4,954 - 1 every 37.8
Tony Romo - 110 on 4,210 - 1 every 38.3
Peyton Manning - 234 on 9,049 - 1 every 38.7
Drew Brees - 194 on 7,458 - 1 every 38.4
Tom Brady - 134 on 7,168 - 1 every 53.5
There seems to be a correlation between frequency of INTs and number of comeback wins.
I've liked the look of our base D with Peppers and Matthews on the line at wide 9...very effective stopping the run on the way to the QB in recent weeks.While the game is still meaningful (until the Pack has a 17 pt. cushion in the 4th qtr) Capers will NOT have any less than 5 in the box, and probably 6 or 7. Stopping the run IS that important, and Capers knows it won't be done with 3 or 4 up front. Love your optimism, but you're not winning over any of us J8 ~ GB has more offensive weapons and a better D.
Packers 38 - Cowboys 27 (only because of a late garbage-time Dallas TD)
Think the Patriots were the hardest test. Think this will be up there, but I thought the Patriots were bringing their A game thinking its similar to a playoff game. I think the Cowplops can run the ball all they want, problem will be the Packers will have their typical offensive success at Lambeau and the 'plops will settle for more field goals than touchdowns.Definitely this game will be the hardest test for our defense so far this season, i think we can do well against them, but the key for them is running the football, that's how the Cowboys could win this game. If we play the way we've been playing at Lambeau so far, i don't think there's a chance for them.. and hopefully Rodgers will be ok for Sunday.
Dallas' top 2 receiver's regular season stats (Bryant & Witten): 152 receptions, 2,023 yds, 21 TD's. GB's (Nelson & Cobb): 189 receptions, 2,806 yds., 25 TD's. Advantage GB!Now saying that Green Bay has MORE offensive weapons than Dallas is a ridiculous statement.. Dallas has three pro bowlers on their offensive line, a qb who is close to rogers this year, better receivers as a unit (especially tight end)... You gotta be kidding me man.. The ratings say that the Packers and Cows are basically tied in regards to stats...
Think the Patriots were the hardest test. Think this will be up there, but I thought the Patriots were bringing their A game thinking its similar to a playoff game. I think the Cowplops can run the ball all they want, problem will be the Packers will have their typical offensive success at Lambeau and the 'plops will settle for more field goals than touchdowns.