Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Fav vs the Cards

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Munch, Dec 10, 2009.

Page 4 of 5

  1. Skol guy Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Message Count:
    766
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    That was the brad Childress prepared team I am use to in the dessert. They did look pathetic. Antione Winfield is back! Holy cow he was impressive today. Ocho cinco had 27 yards with 3 catches. We have missed him for 6 weeks. Anyway I missed you fellas:blind:My ban was lifted today so that is why I wasn't around last week
    Skol guy, Dec 13, 2009
    #76

  2. CM_Awesome Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Message Count:
    964
    Location:
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    fail
    CM_Awesome, Dec 13, 2009
    #77

  3. CM_Awesome Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Message Count:
    964
    Location:
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Perhaps you shouldn't be on here, you should be worried about getting up for junior high school tomorrow. :)
    CM_Awesome, Dec 13, 2009
    #78

  4. Skol guy Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Message Count:
    766
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    ouch I'm wounded
    Skol guy, Dec 14, 2009
    #79

  5. Green_Bay_Packers Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Message Count:
    5,629
    Location:
    Blackburn, England, United Kingdom
    Ratings Received:
    +109 / 1 / -0
    better call an aumbulance kind of wound or just you posting spam?
    Green_Bay_Packers, Dec 14, 2009
    #80
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    Same team?

    Lets look at from the last Viking game

    Offense we had left to right

    Lang, Colledge, Wells, Sitton, Barbre

    Yesterday we had left to right

    Clfton, Colledge, Wells, Sitton, Tauch


    and no Kamp or Harris or Pickett..


    Sacks have leveled off ALOT as well...Dallas game gave up 4...
    Since then, 4 games played and only 6 sacks...

    but yeah, its the same team
    longtimefan, Dec 14, 2009
    #81

  7. angryguy77 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Message Count:
    384
    Location:
    oshkosh
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    Its no use skol. They are being sucked in and are getting all excited about this team. To me its the preseason all over again. Either phili or arz will burst the bubble soon enough.
    angryguy77, Dec 14, 2009
    #82
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    a 5 game winning streak and fans cant be excited?
    longtimefan, Dec 14, 2009
    #83

  9. angryguy77 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Message Count:
    384
    Location:
    oshkosh
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    Well they can be, but do you really think that the problems havn't been masked to a large degree by the teams they faced? I'm not trying to be an ***, but I'm not convinced this team has turned it around. They have in the win dept but I want to see what they do against a good solid playoff team before I think any differently. Wins are all the matter I know, but can they do it against a good team? I don't think so, but we will find out soon enough
    angryguy77, Dec 14, 2009
    #84
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    Honestly I expect a Viking fan to say havent played any one good

    The fact of the matter is they are 9-4, BAD teams or AVERAGE teams do not get that record..

    I poste dit somewhere else...But the line has changed a lot since the last viking game..

    The D has done a ton better since the Viking game..

    I am not breaking it down game by game..Go look at the games we played since the Tampa game and tell me the team hasnt turned it around..

    One stat..

    6 sacks in 4 games..

    Before Dallas it would been 6 sacks in a single game
    longtimefan, Dec 14, 2009
    #85

  11. CM_Awesome Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Message Count:
    964
    Location:
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    That's a shame.
    CM_Awesome, Dec 14, 2009
    #86

  12. angryguy77 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Message Count:
    384
    Location:
    oshkosh
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    Its just my opinion which If im wrong I will admit. But it will take a win over a quality team for me to change my mind. They have played better that I'm not discounting, but I am reserving judgment.
    angryguy77, Dec 14, 2009
    #87

  13. Skol guy Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Message Count:
    766
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    That is blasphemy to its highest degree.:) I agree some of those quality wins we thought we might have don't seem so great now. You play who is on the schedule and that is it.
    Skol guy, Dec 14, 2009
    #88

  14. ThinkICare Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    711
    Ratings Received:
    +15 / 0 / -0
    Ravens and the Cowboys. Those aren't quality teams?
    ThinkICare, Dec 14, 2009
    #89

  15. angryguy77 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Message Count:
    384
    Location:
    oshkosh
    Ratings Received:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    Have you seen how those two teams have been playing the last few weeks? Not very good. Any win is good but not one of these wins have persuaded me to change my mind about the quality of this team.
    angryguy77, Dec 14, 2009
    #90
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    See, does not matter who the Pack beat or when, it will be discredited..

    But with a win vs Frisco with out Gore or Crabtree, thats a quality win?

    and since the Packers are not really a "good team" according to some on here, then how can 2 wins vs them be counted as quality wins?

    So I guess you guys have 9 wins vs not really quality opponents?

    GB x 2
    Det x 2
    Chig once
    Seahawks once
    Browns once
    St Louis once
    Frisco once

    since thats established then it looks like you only have 2 quality wins??

    Cinncy and Baltimore


    notice this is all sarcastic..

    you play who is on your schedule..

    But you wish to pick the hell out of who the Pack play then expect the same
    longtimefan, Dec 14, 2009
    #91

  17. Jess Movement!

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Message Count:
    3,118
    Location:
    Killing the buzz.
    Ratings Received:
    +468 / 1 / -0
    I'll give you the Cowboys, even though I think they were playing well when we beat them, and I already know what the response will be to this ("It's the Lions!"), but Baltimore just got done beating Detroit 48-3. I don't care that they're craptastic, any time you dominate an NFL team by that much it's something noteworthy.
    Jess, Dec 14, 2009
    #92
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    Yeah the Cowboys were on a 4 game streak when they came to us..

    but they werent playing well
    longtimefan, Dec 14, 2009
    #93

  19. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    They were the #3 offense in the NFL, top unit in big plays, top 10 in sacks, and had just beat the Eagles in Philadelphia.

    My expletive they weren't playing well...
    PackersRS, Dec 14, 2009
    #94
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975

    My attempt of using sarcasm

    Sorry!!

    BTW?

    Cards sure look like a quality team tonight!!

    17-0 at the half losing to the Niners
    longtimefan, Dec 14, 2009
    #95

  21. ThinkICare Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    711
    Ratings Received:
    +15 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, so since the Cards look not-so-dominant against the niners like they did against the Vikes, they must not be that good since we beat the niners huh?
    ThinkICare, Dec 14, 2009
    #96

  22. Incubes12 Bay Harbor Butcher?

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,758
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +315 / 0 / -0
    No, no, no. See it was luck that we beat the niners. And it's luck that's letting the niners win against the Card's. Don't you guys see? It's so clear!
    Incubes12, Dec 14, 2009
    #97

  23. ThinkICare Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    711
    Ratings Received:
    +15 / 0 / -0
    My eyes have been opened.
    ThinkICare, Dec 14, 2009
    #98

  24. Incubes12 Bay Harbor Butcher?

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,758
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +315 / 0 / -0
    Good, you won't understand the NFL until you realize that the only talent in the NFL happens to be on the Vikings. No other team has any talent at all. None whatsoever.

    It's lucky that every non-Vikings game doesn't end in a loss for both teams involved.
    Incubes12, Dec 14, 2009
    #99

  25. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    LOL! LOL! LOL! As Barnett says...

    Damnm I'm bad at this sarcasm thingy...:blind:

    Anyway... The Bears still suck.

    And BTW, the Pittsburgh game is a no-win. IF we win, it's because they're on a slump. If we lose, we're a terrible team...

    If we beat Az or Philly in the playoffs, it'll be either because AZ sucks, or because Philly didn't have Westbrook, or Jim Johnson.

    Then, if we beat the Saints, it'll be because they never really had a D, or a running game.

    And, of course, if we beat the Vikings, it'll be because Brett Favre was a double agent all this time, and his real intentions was to lose to us when it mattered...
    PackersRS, Dec 14, 2009
    #100
Page 4 of 5

Share This Page