Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Do we now go CB in the 1st rd?

Discussion in '2010 Draft Archive' started by Pat4DaPack, Nov 14, 2010.

  1. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    I would say it'll be the best available of these three positions:

    OLB
    OT
    CB

    But if LeShoure is there when we pick, he might be hard to pass on.
  2. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,565
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,854 / 62 / -11
    more than likely we take the best player available. I could see us taking a WR if one was left that was that good.
  3. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    We should go kicker in the 1st.

    Before someone (GreenBold) goes all Nazi on me, yes it's a joke. I don't think a pick should ever be used on a kicker, based on all that is involved in kicking and that it's out of the kickers' control.

    /shivers at thoughts of Brett Conway
  4. DergaSmash Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Message Count:
    412
    Location:
    Fort Campbell
    Ratings Received:
    +20 / 0 / -0
    I agree that TT will probably take the best player available, regardless of position. That is unless he has his eye on a specific guy like he did for Matthews, but not likely. I do think they should take the best OLine/OLB/CB that is available. That is unless the rest of the teams gifted us with a top 5 or 10 pick that falls to us.
  5. DevilDon Inclement Weather Fan

    Member Since:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,209
    Ratings Received:
    +351 / 5 / -3
    That is exactly my philosphy, but I like a CB before another OLB, I don't see it as a dire need as others do. Clay is eating up blocks and others are getting the sack. OK, if you find an elite player that dropped I'd get it, but that's the kind of D this team has, no name, everyone does his job and it's all okay.
    I just hope fans realize what an impact Clay is having even without the sacks.
  6. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,565
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,854 / 62 / -11
    early in the season he was getting double teamed and getting the sacks, now he is getting double teamed and nothing. i understand it helps everyone else but I am not thrilled with the dry spell
  7. aaronqb Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 6, 2010
    Message Count:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +73 / 0 / -0
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Incubes12 Bay Harbor Butcher?

    Member Since:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,758
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings Received:
    +315 / 0 / -0
    I think our small, easily overpowered OL has been a pretty glaring weakness this year.
  9. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,565
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,854 / 62 / -11
    This would be the perfect situation to trade up, but knowing ted he will trade down several times. No complaints, he knows what he is doing. But I will revolt if no O linemen are taken.
  10. aaronqb Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 6, 2010
    Message Count:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +73 / 0 / -0
  11. aaronqb Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 6, 2010
    Message Count:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +73 / 0 / -0
  12. DCEBB2011 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Message Count:
    127
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    This year's draft is going to be DEEP at a 2 key positions:

    1. OT - If the draft was held today, there could be as many as 5 SENIOR OTs taken in the first round. That's right folks, 5 SENIORS in the first round BEFORE the juniors even come out! They consist of Sherrod, Solder, Carimi, Castonzo, and Love.

    2. DE - As of today there could be as many as 5 senior DEs with first round talent going in the first round as well. They are Clayborn, Jordan, Kerrigan, Heyward, and Bailey. All but Kerrigan have the size ( over 285lbs ) and speed ( not one is over an estimated 4.92 in the 40 yard dash ) to play DE in the 3-4 defense.


    Now I know you all are saying "Why does this matter since a bunch of juniors will come out and bump some of these guys down anyway?" Well it matters because you could get potential first round talent in the 2nd and 3rd round at these 2 positions! So if a guy grades out as a first round prospect but falls to the 2nd round, he could be a gem. Case in point: Bryan Bulaga. Last season we had him at #10 on the overall board, but because we got him at 23, we made a big jump in value and got the most for our pick. THAT, my friends, is how you have successful drafts. So look at OT and DE this season as strong points where a steal could be found late in the first or even in the 2nd round.
  13. Pat4DaPack

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,241
    Location:
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Ratings Received:
    +139 / 3 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    Trade up and get Prince from Nebraska. Prince on one side and Woodson opposite of him, o my!
  14. DCEBB2011 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Message Count:
    127
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Don't you think that Williams is doing a fine job opposite of Woodson as is?
  15. PackAttackUK Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Message Count:
    689
    Location:
    Liverpool, UK
    Ratings Received:
    +26 / 0 / -0
    I do. But I'd still like to see us draft a top CB prospect.
  16. DCEBB2011 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Message Count:
    127
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    You do realize as of today that we would be picking 19th overall and because Prince Amukamara is likely the best player in the draft ( without any juniors declaring ) he will most likely be top 5 right?

    And you do realize that we would have to aquire roughly 1700 trade points to get to #5?

    And you do realize that would mean we would either have to:

    -Give up our 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round picks.

    -Make a combination of high picks with a player in a trade.

    -Or trade away 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round picks in the future.

    ...in order to get up to the top 5 pick right?



    I hope you understand how insane that sounds from a standpoint of trading away your entire draft either this year or next.
  17. Pat4DaPack

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,241
    Location:
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Ratings Received:
    +139 / 3 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1992
    yeah but we are thin at that position and he was the best CB in the country this year
  18. DCEBB2011 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Message Count:
    127
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    I would have voted for Peterson from LSU as the best CB in the nation this season. He is a shut-down CB with great size and speed. Could be a HOFer, but will go top 5. Prince could go that high as well, so its just a pipe dream to get either one.
  19. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,565
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,854 / 62 / -11
    Hate the idea of trading a ton of picks for a top 5 pick. too expensive as far as contracts go too.

    Woodson is about ready to play safety after this year so yeah we need another corner. I might be ok with it if it only cost us flynn and a 1st or 2nd.
  20. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    Prediction:
    We'll select at least one DB (probably CB), one WR and one interior linemen in this draft. Don't know what rounds, but from what I see on this team, from what I see on the roster, I think TT will take those positions.
    If I had to bet, I'd put my money on G and WR on the first 3 rounds.
  21. ivo610 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,565
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +2,854 / 62 / -11
    Do we resign that kicker of ours or do we draft/ sign one
  22. aaronqb Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    May 6, 2010
    Message Count:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +73 / 0 / -0
    you are right
  23. Packfan14 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Message Count:
    676
    Location:
    Lenoir, NC
    Ratings Received:
    +25 / 0 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1995
    just a thought, Casey Matthews
  24. PackersRS Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Message Count:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    That I have no idea. Would probably tend towards us keeping Crosby.
    I thought we had 8 picks, cause we lost a 7th for Anthony Smith...

    Anyway, anything TT does in the draft is unpredictable. 99% of the people thought he would get a CB for sure last draft...

    So, it is a big deal anyone predicting anything that TT will do in the draft, and nailing it. Usually predicting that a team will draft in a position of need is nothing new, but not with TT...
  25. DCEBB2011 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Message Count:
    127
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Only if we take him after the 4th round...but no earlier.

Share This Page