Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Defense was simply terrific

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by GreenBlood, Sep 13, 2012.

  1. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    It wasn't as good as the 49ers, but it was damn good tonight. 168 total yards for the Bores. 4 INTs, 7 sacks. Good run defense.

    It's clear that our pass rush is MUCH improved over last year, and that was our biggest weakness. It seems to me that Clay is 100% healthy for the first time in about 2.5 years. Tramon was all-pro tonight. Having him 100% is HUGE as well. I see good things for this defense as the season goes on. If they keep it up and the rookies continue to develop, good things are in store. The defense should be back to where they were in 2010.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  2. IluvGB Killer Queen Cheese!

    Member Since:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,006
    Ratings Received:
    +649 / 2 / -4
    Packer Fan Since:
    1919
    Pretty much what Clay said in the post game presser.. good things are here!!! :)
    • Super Moderator

    Kitten Feline Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Message Count:
    4,939
    Location:
    Philly/ South Jersey area
    Ratings Received:
    +1,308 / 3 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    Amen at last!!! Our offense will get it together but it's a huge relief to know we got the D to go with it! I was very much impressed with them tonight.
  3. fettpett Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Message Count:
    928
    Location:
    Exile in SW Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +217 / 3 / -0
    The defense needed a game like this. hopfully it will continue, particularly if the offense keeps up the crappy play
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  4. TeamTundra Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Message Count:
    202
    Location:
    30 Minutes South of Lambeau
    Ratings Received:
    +33 / 1 / -0
    Just as important as the sacks, we probably hit Cutler at least another dozen times. The "D" was just relentless all night. Props also to Erik Walden. I thought he played really well and provided a nice compliment to Clay.
  5. ThxJackVainisi Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Member Since:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,760
    Ratings Received:
    +1,108 / 13 / -4
    The Bear OL is not good so I don't expect this kind of dominance week after week. But it was a tough night for the 'Fire Dom Capers' crowd and I loved it!
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  6. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    I would certainly not say our offense has been "crappy". They're not putting up the numbers they were last year... so far, but part of the reason for that is we actually had the ability to run the ball. It was nice to see balance and the ability to control the clock, which is something we lacked last year. There is definitely improvement to be seen, and I'm 100% confident that we will. This team will be outstanding by playoff time. They're MUCH more similar to the team that won the Superbowl than the team that won 15 games and had a quick playoff exit.
  7. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    No, the Bears OL is pretty bad. But the 49ers OL is excellent and we registered 4 sacks on them. There is absolutely no question this team has made a major upgrade in its pass rush ability. Even when we're not getting to the QB, we're in his head.
  8. fettpett Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Message Count:
    928
    Location:
    Exile in SW Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +217 / 3 / -0
    Who do we play, other than Huston that has a really good Oline?
  9. Crazy Packers Fan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Message Count:
    362
    Location:
    Dreadful Pittsburgh, PA
    Ratings Received:
    +98 / 0 / -0
    By the way, I think Dom Capers deserves at least a little credit for this one. He was really mixing it up on defense throughout this one and only a couple times were the defenders out of position. By all means, please continue to let Clay go all-out at the QB!
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. fettpett Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Message Count:
    928
    Location:
    Exile in SW Michigan
    Ratings Received:
    +217 / 3 / -0
    maybe not crappy...but definitely sluggish...but I will say between work an shity internet I haven't been able to watch the games like I would like
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. ExpatPacker No Longer Primed for the playoffs

    Member Since:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Message Count:
    703
    Location:
    A Galaxy Far, Far Away
    Ratings Received:
    +220 / 5 / -0
    Things I really liked:

    a) the play of our rookies. Worthy, Heyward, McMillan, Daniels. I didn't see much of anything from Perry, but apparently he was able to get pressure.

    b) Tramon Williams. Yes, we have an all-pro corner again.

    c) Woodson at safety seemed like he didn't miss a beat.

    d) Raji showed up.

    e) AJ Hawk. YES, finally! I thought Hawk was very active this game, made some good tackles and lived up to our expectations for once.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    714
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    Defense did look really good. But remember, we were going up against the worst o-line in football.

    Things I liked

    1) Clay Matthews having a career game and getting his teammates fired up to his level.
    2) Sam Shields- I predicted before the game he would step up in a big way and he did. Looked great in coverage and I bet the quick pass rush also helped him there though. Fluke punt hit him and he had the INSTINCTS to quickly fall on it. That's what I've been looking for with him.
    3) Eric Walden might be our short term fix opposite Clay Matthews. He looked terrific in the preseason and has continued his success into this season.
    3) Charles Woodson lead this defense today
    4) The defense knew what they were doing!
    5) Cobb is so versatile and has Percy Harvin playmaking skills when he holds on to the ball.
    6) Crabtree is my favorite no-namer on our roster. Have been following him on Twitter and he's pretty great.
  13. P-E-Z Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    191
    Ratings Received:
    +32 / 4 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    2009
    Yes that would be nice but really do need really click if the d plays like tonight.
  14. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Loved it when he switched Claw and AJ.
    I'm one of those guys who usually hates on Hawk. It feels weird that for once I can't say anything bad, and even weirder to be proud of him. If it wasn't for the WR I'd say keep Hawk on the weak side. Maybe just in nickel...
  15. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Bet a front-runner has emerged in the secondary battle now :)
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,928
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    Def line got pressure, which helps out everyone

    Tramon finally healthy and no harness

    Clay no hammy issues
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. DevilDon Inclement Weather Fan

    Member Since:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,209
    Ratings Received:
    +351 / 5 / -3
    1. Clay didn't get his teammates fired up. They were all week. Media were talking about them as a poor defense like last year.You really believe he's that kind of leader this early in his career? I'd put the motivation on Wood. He's the old guard and the leader.
    2. Go ahead, hate on Sam, give the credit to the rush. Foolish. The scheme, the holding him out of playing time from the coaches all helped Sam. I said it two years ago... Joe Whitt liked him then and I knew he was going to be good. He's a young player on the rise. The Packers have a world class coaching staff. He was always a great athlete, the coaches in Green Bay will make him a star. But you're welcome to think he's good because of a pass rush that was ranked poorly, had miraculously improved, rather than to acknowledge he's gotten better this year. Yea, I see the clarity there. Nice to see he's passed your grade.
    3. So is Perry. Cudos to both. They played a great game. Offenses will have trouble game planning for them both.
    3b. You have two (3s) so I"m giving you the (b). Yep, Wood lead 'em. Refer to #1. Wood fired up Clay.
    4. They always do, it doesn't always work though, offenses are as crafty as defenses.
    5. Did he fumble today Shawnsta in fact, would it be fair to say he doesn't have a history of fumbling? What exactly are you referring to here?
    6. Who doesn't like an underdog? I love the guy because he's a throwback.
  17. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    1. Clay is starting to develop that sort of leadership role, but I agree with you that right now it is probably Woodson. He is the better orator.
    2. I loved Sam, and predicted last year that he would be our starting CB. I've said that we should commit to his development as a starter instead of wasting time with Bush ever since he came back.
    3. Potential being the key word. He is a nice big block of marble for Greene to shape into the Zeus to complement Clay's Thor. Walden seriously out played Perry tonight though. But to think of what Perry could be by next year... Beware the gods of thunder.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. bobgodd Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Message Count:
    37
    Location:
    CA
    Ratings Received:
    +25 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    Really excellent game last night, gentlemen!
  19. Oshkoshpackfan Mo cheese plz

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,321
    Location:
    Jacksonville NC
    Ratings Received:
    +446 / 31 / -4
    Packer Fan Since:
    1981
    Defensive rating on an A - F scale = A
  20. 13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,926
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +851 / 44 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    This was the best defensive performance since the Super Bowl win. They swarmed, they attacked, they pressured, and they tackled. I am so encouraged by their performance. :tup:
  21. 7thFloorRA Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,048
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings Received:
    +371 / 26 / -1
    It was more fun watching the defense than the offense for the first time in years. They played with a different attitude and it was awesome.
  22. rodell330 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    1,135
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings Received:
    +409 / 70 / -7
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    I hope theese guy's keep it up! i liked to see more man because Shields was in the game and Bush wasn't. You don't have to worry about a guy running by him which allows us to be more agressive i think. I loved the fact that Matthews was alll over the place, the guy was meant to rush the passer so let him do what he does best.
    Charles Woodson playing Center field on obvious passing downs. Allows us to have a guy back there who can take the ball away and call coverage adjustments if needed.

    All in all it was a stellar performance. I anxious to see how they perform against the Saints and Texans offense.
  23. metallicblaze Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Message Count:
    109
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Ratings Received:
    +14 / 1 / -0
    Clay was awesome. Tramon was awesome. Hawk was decent, didn't really let up a play, always around the pile and didn't really seem to make a mistake.

    DJ Smith on the hand was pretty bad in coverage. On several plays by Forte, they got first downs. He also was behind the TE that scored their lone TD.

Share This Page