Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

As expected, NFC Loses

Discussion in 'All Other Team Discussions' started by uwbadger12000, Feb 13, 2005.

  1. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    AFC 38, NFC 27

    Green finished with 5 rushes for 25 yards.

    Walker finished with 4 receptions for 53 yards.

    GAME STATS:

    NFC AFC
    1st Downs 26 15
    Rushing 7 5
    Passing 19 9
    Penalty 0 1
    3rd-Down Conversions 10-16 3-10
    4th-Down Conversions 0-1 2-2
    Punts-Average 1-59.0 2-42.5
    Return Yards 136 223
    Punts-Returns 0-0 1-7
    Kickoffs-Returns 5-136 6-165
    Int.-Returns 1-0 3-51
    Penalties-Yards 3-28 2-10
    Fumbles-Lost 1-0 1-1
    Time Of Pos. 35:34 24:26

    Total Net Yards 492 343
    Total Plays 77 51
    Average Gain 6.4 6.7
    Net Yards Rushing 155 120
    Rushes 27 27
    Avg. Per Rush 5.7 4.4
    Net Yards Passing 337 223
    Comp.-Att. 24-48 12-22
    Yards Per Pass 6.7 9.3
    Sacked-Yards Lost 2-16 2-13
    Had Intercepted 3 1
    Touchdowns 3 5
    Rushing 2 1
    Passing 1 3
    Other 0 1
    Extra Points 3-3 5-5
    Field Goals 2-3 1-2
    Red Zone Efficiency 2-6-33% 2-2-100%
    Goal To Go Efficiency 1-1-100% 1-1-100%
    Safeties 0 0
    uwbadger12000, Feb 13, 2005
    #1

  2. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    I think the AFO can wipe their *** better than the NFC.
    Zero2Cool, Feb 13, 2005
    #2

  3. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    most likely. I still think Favre should have made it over Vick.
    uwbadger12000, Feb 14, 2005
    #3

  4. eastcoastpacker Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Message Count:
    484
    Location:
    pennsylvania
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Favre most likely would not go,didn't he turn it down before?
    eastcoastpacker, Feb 14, 2005
    #4

  5. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    He did last year.
    uwbadger12000, Feb 14, 2005
    #5

  6. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    Yea he has turned it down, he'll never play in one again. He's always claimed injury but he jus doesn't like the heat!!

    4000yds and 30+ TDs is the norm for a QB :)
    Zero2Cool, Feb 14, 2005
    #6

  7. fondypackfan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Message Count:
    219
    Location:
    Fond du lac WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I was pissed Vick didn't pass the ball to the wide open Henderson I am glad he got drilled though...
    fondypackfan, Feb 14, 2005
    #7

  8. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I think Vick is the most over-rated offensive player in the NFL.
    uwbadger12000, Feb 14, 2005
    #8

  9. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989

    agreed
    Zero2Cool, Feb 14, 2005
    #9

  10. eastcoastpacker Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 30, 2004
    Message Count:
    484
    Location:
    pennsylvania
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I think you are right,uwbadger.He reminds me of Tarkenton, but not as good.
    eastcoastpacker, Feb 15, 2005
    #10

  11. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Why was Vick in the accuracy contest. The only plus is that he did better than Cullpepper.
    uwbadger12000, Feb 16, 2005
    #11

  12. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    I think it went as the two top vote getters for NFC/AFC were in. I think I'm *** wrong on that though because didn't McNabb start? Maybe the SB QB's weren't allowed in? or didnt wanna participate?
    Zero2Cool, Feb 16, 2005
    #12

  13. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I would rather have Cade McClown in there for the accuracy contest before Vick.
    uwbadger12000, Feb 16, 2005
    #13

  14. arrowgargantuan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,644
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca.
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    i think the real question is how did vick do in the accuracy contest?
    arrowgargantuan, Feb 16, 2005
    #14

  15. uwbadger12000 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Message Count:
    958
    Location:
    River Falls,WI
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    like 40 points. He came in 2nd to last. The only clown he came ahead of was Cullpepper who had the great score of 20.
    uwbadger12000, Feb 16, 2005
    #15

Share This Page