1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up/a> or Log In

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Any Receiver In The Draft

Discussion in 'Draft Talk' started by Wood Chipper, Dec 27, 2012.

  1. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,938
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 24 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    If the Packers could acquire any receiver they wanted in the upcoming draft then which one would you want them to have?

    I personally like Justin Hunter (Tennessee). He seems like a good receiver with a bright future,
  2. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Robert Woods has the "Packers Persona" and fits our prototype.
    Hunter is the best prospect we could hope for.
    Honestly this draft is full of our prototype: 6'+, 4.55- 40yd, YAC receivers who play any receiver spot.
  3. Cheesehead625
    Offline

    Cheesehead625 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ratings:
    +90 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1984
    Honestly Keenan Allen, DeAndre Hopkins, or Cordarrelle Patterson. These guys have big frames and could be stars. There's not a ton of amazing talent at the wide out position this draft. It's almost better to wait for a lower ranked player on a smaller school that could be special. That's why I'm big on us getting a big Tight End this year. I really want this team to start running 2 Tight End sets. I think it would work out amazing as far as exploiting defenses, but also giving Aaron a little more time. Also it opens up the middle of the field for slots and makes deep patterns easier.

    *Edit.. another guy would be Cobi Hamilton who we could pick up maybe in the second.
  4. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Allen yes, Hopkins yes, Patterson is a problem so no, Hamilton yes. Our WR corp is too good for us to run that many 2 TE sets, plus it limits the way we spread the defense. We're not the Patriots and we will not try to be. 3 Wide Single Back sets are IMO the most fun you can have with a defense, and fit this team well. Especially considering after Finley our TE are all blockers.

    TE could almost as deep as WR depending on who declares. The next 3 years will all have ridiculous TE.
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. Cheesehead625
    Offline

    Cheesehead625 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ratings:
    +90 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1984
    Good point about Patterson... wasn't really thinking about it that hard, but he does have his issues. I know we'll never run a two tight end offense, but it would take a damn good rookie tight end to unseat Finley even though he's not that good. We might not see the kid on the field much. As far as tight end depth.. I agree there's a lot, but as far as wide receiver I really don't think there's a lot of talent this year.
  6. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    our prototype is 6'+, sub 4.55, and lots of YAC. All over this draft.
  7. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,938
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 24 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    YAC is not a stat I trust. It fluctuates too much. Drops and how well people run their routes is important to me.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Its a stat that our franchise values. We like shifty guys who break tackles... Well, in our receivers anyway
  9. okcpackerfan
    Offline

    okcpackerfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    713
    Ratings:
    +175 / 2 / -0
    I say we go out of the mold for 1 WR and either get a huge one or a speedster.
  10. rodell330
    Offline

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +831 / 175 / -43
    Packer Fan Since:
    1990
    We need a speedster who can produce right away if jennings leaves and that guy is Terrance williams from Baylor. At 6'2 205 pound running about a 4.48 40 time you can't get any more prototypical than that. I believe he can come in and take the #4 spot over Boykins.
  11. Cheesehead625
    Offline

    Cheesehead625 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ratings:
    +90 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1984
    I have to say I love this guy's combination of size, speed, and vertical leaping ability, but knock on him is his hands. I don't like that he's dropped quite a few balls that should have been easily caught. That being said... he'll fit right in ;)
  12. NorthWestCheeseHead
    Offline

    NorthWestCheeseHead Just talk about FACTS, baby

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    873
    Location:
    Bremerton WA
    Ratings:
    +301 / 36 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1994
    I ended up revisiting a post I made on another forum about a month ago talking about Greg Jennings and it ended up reminding me of a few upcoming rookies to take a look at.

    http://seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=59759&start=20

    Along with having already mentioned DeAndre Hopkins what do you guys think about Markus Wheaton and Tavon Austin?
  13. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Austin has everything we like except height, if he was 3-4 inches taller he'd be top 15. Wheaton would good.
    • Like Like x 1
  14. NorthWestCheeseHead
    Offline

    NorthWestCheeseHead Just talk about FACTS, baby

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    873
    Location:
    Bremerton WA
    Ratings:
    +301 / 36 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1994
    I realize the rational of wanting to have a WR taller than the opposing DB's, but is that 3 or 4 inches Austin is short something that can be worked with or no/go? I'm curious; I really liked the handful of highlights I found of him.
  15. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    15,067
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings:
    +3,535 / 86 / -26
    I want to see what a legit TE can do in this offense. Gonk or witten 2.0

    To think we could of had Gonzalez ... drools.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    I'd say no go personally. We tend to stick around that 6'0 line. Cobb was the shortest guy we drafted at the position in a long time.
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. BorderRivals.com
    Offline

    BorderRivals.com Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    594
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Ratings:
    +499 / 28 / -3
    As much as we'd love the next physical freak, Packers are probably going to look for the quick, twitchy, YAC guy to replace Jennings. Robert Woods fits that mold perfectly. He's a good route-runner and plucks the ball. His stats this season dropped b/c of Lee's emergency. As a result, he'll fall further than he probably should. A nice second-round value potentially. One website compared him to Blackmon entering this season. If that's the case, he'd be a nice 4WR, to say the least.
  18. Cheesehead625
    Offline

    Cheesehead625 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ratings:
    +90 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1984
    What's the point of having that kind of wide out when we don't use slants and short routes? Minus well go big or go home unless we change our game plan.
  19. HyponGrey
    Offline

    HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,731
    Location:
    South Jersey
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 55 / -6
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    We throw the occasional screen.
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page