Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

A way too early look at some 2013 prospects and where they may go.

Discussion in 'Draft Talk' started by category6um, Apr 30, 2012.

  1. category6um Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Message Count:
    20
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1977
    category6um, Apr 30, 2012
    #1

  2. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Don't like it, dude has the same flaw ALL of our RB's have that will make them nothing but better-than-average for the rest of their careers. He will never be great.
    HyponGrey, May 1, 2012
    #2

  3. category6um Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Message Count:
    20
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1977

    Well the article was more for fun then serious, but the reason I had Mike James going to the Pack, is because I see a lot of Najeh Davenport in him. FB/RB hybrid, who can catch, run, and block. He's also a very good goal line runner.

    But yeah he's not Trent Richardson. For that type of back, the Pack would have to pick one in the 1st round.
    category6um, May 2, 2012
    #3

  4. HyponGrey Caseus Locutus Est

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,525
    Location:
    Mount Laurel, New Jersey
    Ratings Received:
    +694 / 35 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1998
    Actually, Saine is alot like Richardson, both are utility backs. Saine is just missing one thing; the same thing all our backs are missing.
    HyponGrey, May 2, 2012
    #4

Share This Page