1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

2010 Packers vs 2009 Vikings

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, Mar 27, 2011.

  1. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    15,131
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings:
    +3,603 / 91 / -35
  2. packerswin96
    Offline

    packerswin96 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    66
    Location:
    LaRonge, Saskatchewan
    Ratings:
    +18 / 0 / -0
    Doesn't really matter at all, except that the 2010 Packers won the SB, and the 2009 Vikings didn't.
    • Like Like x 4
  3. PackersRS
    Offline

    PackersRS Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    I think that with these kind of threads it's pretty clear that their fanbase is the worst in the league. That is just pathetic, they're absolutely clueless, and it's not a coincidence that they don't have any SBs. They simply can't recognize reality, and it reflects on the franchise.

    That is why I don't respect vikings fans, but do bears fans. Hate them both, but at least I respect the bears fans, they're very aware of the condition of their team.

    (there are exceptions, of course)
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Aaron rodgers is god
    Offline

    Aaron rodgers is god Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    786
    Location:
    Kenosha WISCONSIN
    Ratings:
    +154 / 9 / -2
    I would have taken the 2009 packers over the 2009 vikings.
  5. VersusTheMoose
    Offline

    VersusTheMoose Greatest of All-Time

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,337
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Ratings:
    +161 / 0 / -0
    Yeah that is pretty pathetic, but I am used to Viking fans absolutely embarrassing themselves by now.
  6. GBPack2010
    Offline

    GBPack2010 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    483
    Location:
    CA
    Ratings:
    +67 / 0 / -0
    LOL championships determine a team's success during a season. Who the hell wants to play for a team that lost the NFC Championship on a terrible decision to throw late in the game?
  7. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    15,131
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings:
    +3,603 / 91 / -35
    At least they are being realistic about next season, most say they think 6 wins would be a reach.

    They should absolutely tank next season and get Luck
  8. YouFrgotPoland
    Offline

    YouFrgotPoland Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    358
    Ratings:
    +66 / 0 / -0
    Obviously we all are a bit biased about how much Vikings fans suck, at least more than fans of teams in other divisions. But I do wonder if anyone knows of these kind of reports from fans of any of those other teams, cuz Vikings fans in my experience really are just bad people lol....

    One guy I know is still convinced that the Vikes just threw the second game this past season because they wanted to get Chilly fired...
  9. Green_Bay_Packers
    Offline

    Green_Bay_Packers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,629
    Location:
    Blackburn, England, United Kingdom
    Ratings:
    +109 / 1 / -0
    HAHAHA There all funny on that board :D

    A few of them look like they have sense
  10. Kitten
    Offline

    Kitten Feline Cheesehead Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,052
    Location:
    Philly/ South Jersey area
    Ratings:
    +1,399 / 7 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    Grasping at straws.... They are probably just looking for something, anything, to make them feel better. They've had some rotten luck this year and next year, probably the next several years, don't look that much better for them. Do we kick them while they are down? Well, to be honest, I can't name a better time to kick them. :haha:
    • Like Like x 2
  11. greenandgold
    Offline

    greenandgold I'm Dirty Hairy Callahan

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,642
    Location:
    Mobile, AL.
    Ratings:
    +442 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1962
    Yep, that is the best time to kick them. Hard to kick them if your team is the one sucking.

    Fortunately, that weren't the case this year. :happy0005:
  12. greenandgold
    Offline

    greenandgold I'm Dirty Hairy Callahan

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,642
    Location:
    Mobile, AL.
    Ratings:
    +442 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1962
    I wouldn't. We had two shots at them that year, they beat us both times.

    Of course, I remember the year we beat them twice in the regular season, only to have them beat the Packers in post season, so who knows?
  13. Big E
    Offline

    Big E Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Ratings:
    +106 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1995
    That's one of the funniest things I've read in a long time
    • Like Like x 1
  14. GreenBayGal
    Offline

    GreenBayGal Cheese Goddess

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,374
    Location:
    30 Minutes from Lambeau, WISCONSIN
    Ratings:
    +1,122 / 2 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    That's the only way we CAN kick them. Maybe if they learned how to play football they wouldn't always suck and then we could kick them on a different level. :viksux:
  15. GreenBayGal
    Offline

    GreenBayGal Cheese Goddess

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,374
    Location:
    30 Minutes from Lambeau, WISCONSIN
    Ratings:
    +1,122 / 2 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    They're just trying to feel better about signing our rejects.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Darth Garfunkel
    Offline

    Darth Garfunkel Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    485
    Location:
    denver
    Ratings:
    +440 / 4 / -0
    I love those kind of pointless, speculative comparisons.
    It may as well be "Who would win a fist-fight, Darth Vader or the Terminator?"
  17. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,955
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 24 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    I would take the 96 and 97 Packers over any Vikings team too, while we are making dumb hypothetical fights.
  18. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    15,131
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings:
    +3,603 / 91 / -35
    terminator
  19. greenandgold
    Offline

    greenandgold I'm Dirty Hairy Callahan

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,642
    Location:
    Mobile, AL.
    Ratings:
    +442 / 3 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    1962
    Give me odds on Vader?
  20. Arod2gjdd
    Offline

    Arod2gjdd Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    48
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    this
  21. cheesehurdler
    Offline

    cheesehurdler Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    495
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Ratings:
    +194 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    2007
    Which team won the Super Bowl? Exactly.

    Although, technically, by that logic, you can say that the 2010 Green Bay Packers are better than every Minnesota Vikings football team ever existed, even the 1998 Minnesota Vikings, since the Vikings never won the Super Bowl... which I'm fine with.
    • Like Like x 5
  22. FrankRizzo
    Offline

    FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,828
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings:
    +1,647 / 61 / -33
    Packer Fan Since:
    1969
    The 2009 Vikings were the best team in the NFL last year, but their QB, in the end, threw the Super Bowl away.
    Just like the ****** did for the Packers in 2008 & 2004.

    The best team rarely wins the Super Bowl, and Super Bowls are the bottom line.
  23. buckshotrob
    Offline

    buckshotrob Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    62
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0
    hold up i kno farves a choke artist but we was the best team in football this year if we were healthy it would have been 16-0 cant no body beat us we top dogs in this game
  24. VBJunkie
    Offline

    VBJunkie Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    48
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Exactly what I was going to post...

    :viksux:
  25. FrankRizzo
    Offline

    FrankRizzo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,828
    Location:
    Dallas
    Ratings:
    +1,647 / 61 / -33
    Packer Fan Since:
    1969
    Remember in 2009 when Benedict called his Vikings team the most talented team he'd ever been on?
    Well, he may have been right, and they should have gone to the Super Bowl.... but he did what he often did: he threw it all away at the very end. How perfectly fitting.

    Then this year, we swept their a***s and he's not a footnote, while our good guy is something he never ever was: Super Bowl MVP. That's gotta burn the old man up!
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page