1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Create an Account or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member! Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

2010 Packers vs 2009 Vikings

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ivo610, Mar 27, 2011.

  1. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,791
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +3,430 / 81 / -25
    me too I hope they dont ban him for trolling.
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Jess
    Offline

    Jess Movement!

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,118
    Location:
    Killing the buzz.
    Ratings Received:
    +471 / 1 / -0
    A few things, I've bolded the parts I want to talk about.

    1) What does Minnesota have besides the Vikings? The Twins? The Golden Gophers ( :icon_lol: seriously, that can't be the answer)? A really big mall? Have fun with that.

    2) Is that so? I missed the Super Bowl victory parade. And what were the 2010 Vikings that we curbed twice missing from the 2009 version? Sidney Rice? Woot. We had injuries too. Lots of them.

    3) You were the #2 seed that year. And you lost to the #1 seed. And they won the Super Bowl. Don't say that like it's fact, it's not.

    4) Anger because our legendary QB snaked his way to our direct rival with the stated goal of "sticking it" to us? No.. never. That's irrational, says I!

    5) 2 years ago they weren't a Super Bowl winning GM and QB, respectively. Things change when you win. And I supported Aaron from the getgo, and I think a lot of us did, so I don't really know what you're driving at.

    Anyways, have fun at the Mall of America or whatever it is Minnesotans do. Ride the Paul Bunyan Log Ride, it's awesome, but bring a change of clothes because you might get wet. :)
  3. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,791
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +3,430 / 81 / -25
    Too add to what jess said...

    Your most proud of your hockey and lakes... yet UW has won more titles in Hockey than UM and we have more lakes.

    As Charlie says, WINNING!
  4. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +1,335 / 23 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    we didnt have starks in both games we played you
    • Like Like x 1
  5. PackersRS
    Offline

    PackersRS Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    Why the hell talk about Minnesota x Wisconsin? I'm from Brazil! Most Packers fans in here aren't from WI. It's called a FANBASE. Some teams have it, some don't. I'm not cheering for Wisconsin, I'm not at a Wisconsin board. I'm at a Packers board talking about the Packers.

    And don't give us no turncoaters crap. Those are out of our fanbase since the Favre fiasco. Only the faithful were proud to celebrate SB XLV.

    Those turncoaters are your problem now. Deal with it.

    And, again, only a Vikings fan can conclute that a non-SB champion is better than a SB champion. AGAIN, it's no coincidence your ****** franchise doesn't have any titles. If you don't know what is like to win, how can you win? If you think that a LOSING team (that's what the 2009 Vikings are, LOSERS) is better than a WINNING team, you'll never win it.

    Talent wise, they may even be better. But this sport is much more about 11 talented guys on the field at a time. We have a TEAM, a quality TEAM that will be in place for the next 5 years at least.

    You had a bunch of talented mercenaries wearing purple. Now all you have is a bunch of talentless mercenaries wearing purple.

    Good luck next season, though.
  6. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +1,335 / 23 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    The Packers are 49-44-1 lifetime against the Vikings
  7. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,791
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +3,430 / 81 / -25
    well about 43 people outside of MN cheer for the Vikings, because they realize its pointless to cheer for a team that wont ever have anything to put in their trophy case.
  8. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +1,335 / 23 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    I have never lived in wisconsin and been a fan of GB since I was 10
  9. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,791
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +3,430 / 81 / -25
    plus their main color is purple... who wants to wear that around?

    besides john cena
  10. PackersRS
    Offline

    PackersRS Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,471
    Location:
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
    Ratings Received:
    +979 / 0 / -0
    Nono, no banning, unless he goes on a rampage of insults and such.

    Actually, I wanna personally thank our Viking friend for giving us all something to laugh about in this boring time of the year.

    Here's to the Vikings staying forever in Minnesota and, consequently, in the Packers' shadow!

    SKOL
  11. Jess
    Offline

    Jess Movement!

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,118
    Location:
    Killing the buzz.
    Ratings Received:
    +471 / 1 / -0
    And I applaud those people. It's a sound decision. Pick a team with no expectations ever, and you'll never be disappointed.
  12. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +1,335 / 23 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rhoLCPucMw]YouTube - Vikings vs Packers 2010 Highlights (week 11)[/ame]
    No starks and no chester taylor. Plus we had zero running game and no homefield advantage.
  13. Big E
    Offline

    Big E Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Ratings Received:
    +106 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1995
    Ivo's point is perfectly valid, you meathead. You don't think Jermichael Finley and Ryan Grant were integral parts of our offense like Sidney Rice and Chester Taylor were to yours? Jermichael Finley was targeted 26 times in the first 4 games before getting injured, with 100+ yards receiving twice in those games. Ryan Grant was coming off of back to back 1200 yard seasons. I'd say that's pretty integral to the offense, wouldn't you?

    Here's a better comparison for you:

    What are the 2010 Packers minus Grant, Finley, Tauscher, Barnett, Burnett, Chillar, Poppinga, Jones, Neal, and others?
    The answer: Super Bowl champions!

    What are the 2009 Vikings minus Chester Taylor, Artis Hicks, Sidney Rice, Chris Cook and Cedric Griffin?
    The answer: Complete and utter crap. 6-10 record, 4th in the division.

    What would the 2009 Vikings have been if they had lost their starting RB, TE, RT, ROLB, MLB, and SS along with top backups at TE, DE, OLB, and MLB?
    The answer: Number one!...pick in the draft.

    Why can the 2010 Packers lose so many players and still win the Super Bowl when the 2009 Vikings couldn't even make it to the Super Bowl? Because the 2010 Packers are better than the 2009 Vikings were. Case closed.
  14. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +1,335 / 23 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SD6vlY7H6OI&feature=related]YouTube - Green Bay Packers vs. Minnesota Vikings WK7 2010[/ame]
    o look we didnt have a running game
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Vikeman
    Offline

    Vikeman Guest

    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    There's no sense in arguing any of this because I am behind enemy lines...and it's pointless. I can sit here and say 2 + 2 is 4 and they'll be a rack of Packer fans arguing this aint so. There is no way you can clearly say the 2010 Packers are better than the Vikings. The best teams in the NFL are not always the superbowl winners that year. Hence the 97 Packers and the 98 Vikings. So that argument is moot.

    Matter of fact scrolling back in this mess of a thread there are so many facts that are wrong and skewed it's not worth arguing. Furthermore I am not trolling...I simply replied to the meathead that said losing Sidney Rice and Chester Taylor was not a big deal. Which is beyond stupid. That statement has nothing to do with the Packers. Like the Packers we were smashed by injuries this year. We were hurt a little bit more and in more important positions. We lost Sidney, our best cover corner, Percy Harvin for half the season, our QB was a cracked fossil, our safties were injured every other weak, and our line was playing injured all year. For someone to say that's not a big deal is retarded. If the Packers were to lose there two starting receivers you go nowhere this year. Nowhere.

    And to say Viking fans don't exist outside Minnesota is dumb too. You watch any away game for the Vikings there is a sea of purple. The Vikings have one of the best fanbases around. I am proud to be an out of state Viking fan.

    And you can't compare an even loss of players to ours. Us losing Peterson would be a much bigger deal than losing Ryan fricken Grant. Give me a break. Comparing Finley to Shainco is a joke as well. And if you remember we did lose our starting safety and starting linebacker in 2009. So know we didn't and wouldn't finish at the bottom.

    I like the chipperness in here now. Considering this place was pretty much a ghost town in 06 07 08 and yes 09. And it had nothing to do with the site being sold. Now you got a bunch of cocky 14 year old noobs that want to bark. I love it...I want more of it.
  16. Wood Chipper
    Offline

    Wood Chipper Fantasy Football Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2010
    Messages:
    3,854
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings Received:
    +1,335 / 23 / -2
    Packer Fan Since:
    2001
    97 packers werent the best clearly as they were beat fair and square. same with the 98 vikings. had they been the best then it would not have come down to a fg
  17. ivo610
    Offline

    ivo610 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,791
    Location:
    Madison
    Ratings Received:
    +3,430 / 81 / -25
  18. Kitten
    Offline

    Kitten Feline Cheesehead Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,028
    Location:
    Philly/ South Jersey area
    Ratings Received:
    +1,383 / 7 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1993
    True, we didn't have SuperStarks for either of those games, but the Packers still beat the Vikings. The Packers won the Superbowl and the Vikings failed to even make it to the playoffs. Kicking dead horses must please the hell out of some Vikings fans, I suppose because they can't get a hold of Favre to kick him. It's dead, as in you killed it! Focus on rebuilding your team and finding a solid, reliable QB and then come dance with us. We'll be waiting (and SuperStarks, too)!
  19. GreenBayGal
    Offline

    GreenBayGal Cheese Goddess

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,374
    Location:
    30 Minutes from Lambeau, WISCONSIN
    Ratings Received:
    +1,122 / 2 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1960
    To The Viking Guy: When the Vikings win the SB, or even have a contending team, you'll also have a bunch of 14 year old noobs that want to bark. But in the mean time, you can relish in your veteran fan base.
  20. cheesehurdler
    Offline

    cheesehurdler Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    495
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +194 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    2007
    If it's pointless, then why are you on a Packers forum arguing about which team is better? I don't go onto Vikings forums and argue with others because, like you said, it'd be pointless.

    He didn't say it "wasn't a big deal", he said that the Packers suffered worse injuries.

    We lost Grant & Starks for most of the season, which was our entire rushing offense. We lost a promising rookie in Morgan Burnett, and we also lost Al Harris and Atari Bigby, a large part of our secondary. We lost Jermichael Finley, one of the best TEs in the league, and we also lost Nick Barnett and Cullen Jenkins, another huge part of our defense, along with Mark Tauscher, who held our OL together. We even lost our quarterback for one game, and we were still good. So, to say that you "were hurt a little bit more and in more important positions" is an overstatement. Also, didn't your "cracked fossil" throw for 33 TD and 7 INTs last season?

    There are out of country Packers fans, as well. I know there are some Packers fans on this very forum who live in Brazil (PackersRS), Great Britain (PackAttackUK), and Australia (Ausnadian). Do you know of any out of country Vikings fans?

    Losing Peterson would be a big deal, yes, but in a way, we're still even. Without Peterson, you have no running game. Without Grant & Starks, we have no running game as well. Also, you did not just say that Shaincoe is better than Finley. Finley's a stud. He's like 7 feet tall and can catch balls out of nowhere. He's one of the best in the league.

    I thought you said you weren't trolling?
  21. GeeDogWarrior
    Offline

    GeeDogWarrior 0 - 0

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    380
    Location:
    Titletown, Mexico
    Ratings Received:
    +137 / 2 / -1

    Here's an Idea, how about the 2009 vikings have the same exact Injuries we had in 2010...then it'd be a FAIR fight.

    Let's takeaway DE Ray edwards due to suspension, let's take away your no1 running back, a DT in wk 1, let's takeaway two safeties, two middle linebackers, two ROLBs, another DE, the Starting RT, your no.1 TE.

    alright, what's the vikings record in 2009 now compared to our record in 2010?

    Pretty Sure The Vikings wouldn't do S*** in 2009 with those injuries....We ?
    We Won THE FREAKING SUPERBOWL!:happy0005:
  22. ThorMatthews
    Offline

    ThorMatthews Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Ratings Received:
    +77 / 0 / -0
    Wasn't their 2010 and 2009 team essentially the same?
  23. Unomee
    Offline

    Unomee Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    197
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, but it's a dry heat.
    Ratings Received:
    +37 / 0 / -0
    Now a Packers team of the quality of the 2009 and 1998 Viking teams would have won it all rather than stumbling and falling, right? :viksux:
  24. DevilDon
    Offline

    DevilDon Inclement Weather Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,389
    Ratings Received:
    +443 / 15 / -5
    I absolutely love it, Minnie-Soda fans wanna think their team is better? Hell, I think my imaginary all Packers team is better than any other teams. You can imagine all you want.
    It comes down to this: the best TEAM is the best team. The best football club wins every year. It's simple, if you have good to average players with a great system and outstanding coaching you'll win more than you lose. Yea, it wasn't about marquee names lighting up the scoreboard. It wasn't just Clay or Wood stopping you, every time teams came at us, the TEAM stood up and made it work. Honestly, I've been watching Packers football since the early 60's, this is the best TEAM we've fielded and it's not going away.
    So to Minnie-Soda fans, listen......
    We don't take moral victories here, we win football games and championships. If you wanna root for a team that wears purple and NEVER wins, good luck to you and hats off, you are a true fan. You don't bother me, it's Bears' fans that do, they are actually good once in awhile. The Vikings are always the sure bet to suck and hey, one more thing....
    How do you feel about next season? Grats on being a fan of the worst NFL franchise but wonder how you don't embrace the "Aint's" at least they won a SB.
    • Like Like x 2
  25. neilfii
    Offline

    neilfii Hall of Fame Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,681
    Location:
    NW Indiana
    Ratings Received:
    +714 / 0 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1965
    Would that be before or after you take away Grant and Finley?

    You can't possibly rationally argue that you had more injuries or injuries that were more significant than those we experienced this year, and if you do want seriously to make that argument then please let the rest of us know exactly what you've been smoking and where we can get some or from which "institution" you are writing so we can avoid going there.

Share This Page