Dantés
Gute Loot
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 12,094
- Reaction score
- 3,012
I had a thought the other day. I wondered what would happen in terms of hit rate if you reduced a board down to exclusively guys who checked the boxes in regards to film, athleticism, and production. Obviously it's common sense that if a guy has all three of those working for them, they're probably pretty good, but the problem is how do you quantify it? So what I propose to do it post lists of various prospects who meet all of the following criteria:
-A draft grade of 6.20 or higher from Lance Zierlein, or being ranked in the top 100 by Jeremiah, Brugler, or PFF (basically checking this box means that someone who has a reasonable idea of what they're watching thought you looked good on tape).
-A RAS of 8.0 or better.
-At least two years of minimum acceptable production (to be determined by position).
My contention isn't that these are the only guys we should draft, but I'm curious for future reference how strong the hit rate will be on these lists.
-A draft grade of 6.20 or higher from Lance Zierlein, or being ranked in the top 100 by Jeremiah, Brugler, or PFF (basically checking this box means that someone who has a reasonable idea of what they're watching thought you looked good on tape).
-A RAS of 8.0 or better.
-At least two years of minimum acceptable production (to be determined by position).
My contention isn't that these are the only guys we should draft, but I'm curious for future reference how strong the hit rate will be on these lists.