Agreed on almost everything, except on the creepy part. LOL about that...
Funny - I thought TT's creepiness was something everybody agreed on.
Agreed on almost everything, except on the creepy part. LOL about that...
Funny - I thought TT's creepiness was something everybody agreed on.
Agreed? Yeah. But not to the point that it actually bothers me. People talk bad about him personally like it would affect his permanence on the job. Who cares if he's creepy or homosexual or whatever? If he's doing his job, fine with me. If he's not, then fire him.Funny - I thought TT's creepiness was something everybody agreed on.
Agreed? Yeah. But not to the point that it actually bothers me. People talk bad about him personally like it would affect his permanence on the job. Who cares if he's creepy or homosexual or whatever? If he's doing his job, fine with me. If he's not, then fire him.
Holmgren looks just like Wally Walrus. That's not creepy? Nobody cared back then.
he often appears frightfully uncomfortable and shifty-eyed when he realizes the camera is on him - almost like he's hiding something very important.
.
Brett Favre (as much as I hate to say it) said it best in 07 when he said that this is the most talented team in a long time.
He said it again...only this time about this Viking team being the most talented team he's ever been on. there's #4 playing to his latest constituency... on a team that hasn't won doodly-squat -- and it's a more highly talented team than one that went to 3 consecutive NFC Championship games... 2 consecutive Super Bowls....and 1 Super Bowl winner.
The guy is just so full of **** he can't even help it anymore.....
I think the talent level of those teams compared to the current Vikings is closer than you'd think.He said it again...only this time about this Viking team being the most talented team he's ever been on. there's #4 playing to his latest constituency... on a team that hasn't won doodly-squat -- and it's a more highly talented team than one that went to 3 consecutive NFC Championship games... 2 consecutive Super Bowls....and 1 Super Bowl winner.
The guy is just so full of **** he can't even help it anymore.....
What? Blasphemy! Reggie White alone was a lot better than their whole line together. The guy was the best DL of all time. 0.85 sacks and 4,5 tackles per game in his whole career. In Philly, he had more sacks than games! Gilbert was a moster as good as, if not better than Pat Williams. Kevin is better than Dotson was, but Jones was better than Edwards is. I don't even think that their DL is the best in the NFL. The Giants have a far superior one, specially if you take into consideration that the DL rotates during the game.I'll take the Vikes D-line over Reggie, Gilbert, Dotson, and Sean Jones. Yes, I just said that. The numbers say the Vikings rush defense is the best in history. And it's because of their line play with the Williams Wall and Allen. Add in the fact that Allen is playing like a white Reggie this year and it's at the very least a wash.
lol:happy0005:What? Blasphemy! Reggie White alone was a lot better than their whole line together. The guy was the best DL of all time. 0.85 sacks and 4,5 tackles per game in his whole career. In Philly, he had more sacks than games! Gilbert was a moster as good as, if not better than Pat Williams. Kevin is better than Dotson was, but Jones was better than Edwards is. I don't even think that their DL is the best in the NFL. The Giants have a far superior one, specially if you take into consideration that the DL rotates during the game.
-
Favre was full of **** when he said that a team that never won a playoff game is better than one that went to 2 superbowls and a lot of playoff games... The only thing they got better than those teams is Peterson, and Hutchinson.
Can't argue with that but the one thing that scares me as a Viking fan is Brad ChildressI think the talent level of those teams compared to the current Vikings is closer than you'd think.
I'll take Peterson over Levens.
I'll take the Vikes D-line over Reggie, Gilbert, Dotson, and Sean Jones. Yes, I just said that. The numbers say the Vikings rush defense is the best in history. And it's because of their line play with the Williams Wall and Allen. Add in the fact that Allen is playing like a white Reggie this year and it's at the very least a wash.
The mid-90's Packes had a better secondary though, with Butler, Evans, Newsome/Williams, and Eugene/Teague. Also they have a better receiver core with Freeman, Brooks, and Rison/Mickens/Schroeder. I don't think Berrian, Harvin, and Rice are at that level...yet. Harvin is going to be very good though, and Rice is finding his groove lately.
I don't know enough about the mid-90's O-line to make a judgement there, but I know the Vikings have a damn good one right now.
Like it or not Packer fans, this Vikings team is Super Bowl caliber.
I think the talent level of those teams compared to the current Vikings is closer than you'd think.
I'll take Peterson over Levens.
I'll take the Vikes D-line over Reggie, Gilbert, Dotson, and Sean Jones. Yes, I just said that. The numbers say the Vikings rush defense is the best in history. And it's because of their line play with the Williams Wall and Allen. Add in the fact that Allen is playing like a white Reggie this year and it's at the very least a wash.
The mid-90's Packes had a better secondary though, with Butler, Evans, Newsome/Williams, and Eugene/Teague. Also they have a better receiver core with Freeman, Brooks, and Rison/Mickens/Schroeder. I don't think Berrian, Harvin, and Rice are at that level...yet. Harvin is going to be very good though, and Rice is finding his groove lately.
I don't know enough about the mid-90's O-line to make a judgement there, but I know the Vikings have a damn good one right now.
Like it or not Packer fans, this Vikings team is Super Bowl caliber.
Great post. Everybody talks about that SB team and only mentions BF, rightfully so, he was the best player in the league, but that team was the whole deal.The Vike's defense is like Green Bay's offense - ONE DIMENSIONAL.
Minny's defense overall is ranked #14.
Minny's rush defense is #10.
Minny's pass defense is #18. (225 yards per game).
Minny's yards allowed is #14 (310 yards per game).
Minny's scoring defense is #10 (18 ppg).
When you factor in Minny's inability to stop the pass, the "average" to just about an average defense. The 1996 Packers defense was smothering in every facet.
1996 Green Bay overall D was ranked #1.
GB's rush defense was #4.
GB's pass defense was #1 (171 yards per game allowed).
GB's yards allowed was #1 (259 yards per game)
GB's scoring defense was #1 (13.1 ppg)
So, you can see that Minnesota is NOT currently a Super Bowl-caliber defense. This will need to change, or they will need to get extremely luck with match-ups in the playoffs. Maybe NEXT year, if Minny infuses some additional talent, but not this year, much to my chagrin.:stinker:
Great post.