Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pkrjones" data-source="post: 678398" data-attributes="member: 9982">One of the articles linked yesterday showed the Packers had 3WR, 1TE & 1RB formation almost 78% of the plays run so far.  Wouldn't that "mandate" the defense be in their base D or nickel?  It's also common knowledge that GB runs the no-huddle or hurry-up offense so that the D can't change personnel.  Wouldn't it make more sense to line-up in 4WR, 1RB (Lacy) and "lock-in" the D to Dime?  Since our TE's are average (at best) blockers it would seem that having 4 WR's with the occasional Lacy run against dime D would be a more effective mismatch, wouldn't it?</blockquote>

Total: 560 (members: 1, guests: 559)