1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Randall and Rollins

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Ace, May 13, 2015.

  1. Ace

    Ace Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    Messages:
    1,174
    Ratings:
    +525
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Vrill

    Vrill Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,782
    Ratings:
    +828
    Good article, but I think its been discussed here how versatile those two picks are for us. They can line up and practically play anywhere in the secondary.
     
  3. El Guapo

    El Guapo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,524
    Ratings:
    +1,992
    At their ages and with their athleticism, both should be willing to try anything to make a starting roster. It's all about the $$$
     
  4. JBlood

    JBlood Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,158
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Capers' and LeBeau's defenses are as complicated as any in football, and usually thrive when veterans are on the field. I'll be pleasantly surprised if a couple of rookies--1 of whom has played college football 1 year-- shine in it.
     
  5. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,539
    Ratings:
    +1,298
    I agree. Rarely do rookies make great impacts right away in Capers system. Matthews was the exception because he played with? Wait for it some great veterans and he was good at his ASSINGMENT. Having guys like Charles Woodson, Nick Collins, Ryan Pickett, And Cullen Jenkins helped Matthews tremendously.
     
  6. AmishMafia

    AmishMafia Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,975
    Ratings:
    +2,226
    And these rookies will be playing with some great veterans like CM3, Peppers, Raji, and Daniels.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. TJV

    TJV Lifelong Packers Fanatic

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,389
    Ratings:
    +4,176
    On the most recent Sidelines show, Wilde said he was extremely impressed with the way Rollins moved in the first practice and he said he thinks Rollins has a good shot to start opposite Shields. Oates immediately chimed in with the obvious caveat about Rollins’ speed. Wilde also said he thinks Goodson may be the new Jarrett Bush on STs. They talked about the obvious comparison between the backgrounds of Rollins and Goodson but agreed Rollins moves better.

    That Capers’ schemes are complicated and Thompson’s MO of draft and develop keeps the team one of the younger ones in the league puts a large burden on the assistant coaches. My impression is Joe Whitt, Jr. is one of the better ones on the staff and if one of the rookies can play the outside spot opposite Shields it’s perhaps the easiest spot in the secondary to learn.
     
  8. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,718
    Ratings:
    +6,663
    Casey Hayward had a pretty good rookie season as well and finished third in the voting for defensive ROTY in 2012 (just like Matthews did in 2009).
     
  9. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,539
    Ratings:
    +1,298
    again he wasn't asked to do much but defend the slot. Woodson, Williams, Matthews, Pickett, and Hawk were in the team as well.
     
  10. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,718
    Ratings:
    +6,663
    Hayward played 21.9% of his cover snaps on the outside during his rookie season totaling four interceptions on only 95 snaps.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,539
    Ratings:
    +1,298
    Ohhh I'm so glad you shared this because now i can post this to the guys who argue that Hayward can't play on the outside. I'd like to see them argue still after looking at this. This PROVES my point that you don't have to be a track star to play on the outside. Take the top 5. Corners in the NFL based on production and see how many run blazing 40 times. The "top 2" in many peoples books don't.
     
  12. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,816
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    The question isn't whether Hayward can play on the outside. The question is whether he can play man coverage on the outside. Playing outside zone with topside help, with the relative freedom to jump a route, is one thing. Being on the island is a whole different matter.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. Vrill

    Vrill Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,782
    Ratings:
    +828
    And I kind of question if Hayward can play true man coverage myself. I guess we'll find out in due time though.
     
  14. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,539
    Ratings:
    +1,298

    Again, why are you guys so concerned with his man coverage if Capers plays so much zone coverage? I have a feeling that when it does come time to play man He will slide inside to the slot anyways.
     
  15. Eli Haugen

    Eli Haugen Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,533
    Ratings:
    +255
    When the big boys up front wreck the O-line. Every ones job is easier...
    Also, Craig Newsome was a rookie CB. Along with Doug Evans who was 2nd year . They were a huge part of our 3rd superbowl. Not a Capers scheme. But rookies can make an impact if played right.
     
  16. Eli Haugen

    Eli Haugen Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,533
    Ratings:
    +255
    Rollins seems to be getting alot of attention. Im curious what Randall would have done, had he not tweaked the ankle? I speculate that Rollins was on the list for CBs to be picked at #30. Randall just higher on the board obviously. But when Rollins was still available at #62, we had to take him. Now we got both. Im speculating when Randall gets healthy he will match what Rollins brings to the table. Which so far is very good it sounds like.
     
  17. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,718
    Ratings:
    +6,663
    If you want the Packers to move Hayward inside when playing man coverage who do you want to take his spot on the outside???

    Newsone was in his second season and Evans in his fourth when the Packers won the Super Bowl in 1996.
     
  18. Vrill

    Vrill Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,782
    Ratings:
    +828
    Is it sounding like Rollins maybe a boundary corner for us? What is the word on him?
     
  19. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,718
    Ratings:
    +6,663
    It seems like four defensive backs in Hayward, Randall, Rollins and Goodson will get a chance to compete for the starting spot opposite Shields. It should be interesting to see who´s going to win the job.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Vrill

    Vrill Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,782
    Ratings:
    +828
    I'm secretly hoping someone else other than Hayward starts opposite Shields so that Hayward can stay in the slot. I think Randall will be a Safety for us in certain packages.....so I guess that leaves either Rollins or Goodson....or perhaps that Undrafted rookie from Miami we picked up, Gunter?
     
  21. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,718
    Ratings:
    +6,663
    The best one out of the group will start outside as it´s the more important position compared to nickel or dime corner. Gunter, while having great size for an outside corner, doesn´t possess the speed (4.65 40 at his pro day while also having a terrible 20 yard shuttle and 3-cone drill) nor the athleticism (only 33 1/2 inch vertical) to play there.
     
  22. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,816
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    Because he runs plenty of man coverage, and enough single-high safety that somebody is on the island even in some zone schemes.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  23. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,539
    Ratings:
    +1,298
    He runs enough..I wouldn't say "plenty".even then wouldn't you expect the more athletic and faster Shields to be the guy playing the man to man? Yea, I would.
     
  24. captainWIMM

    captainWIMM Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    12,718
    Ratings:
    +6,663
    I would expect Shields to cover the opponent´s top receiver most of the time and Capers would be smart to provide some safety help on that side of the field as well.
     
  25. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,816
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    I think "plenty" is apt.

    Capers is typically top 5 in blitz frequency, and only a small percentage of those blitzes would qualify as the so-called "zone blitz" where a lineman (or Peppers as was the case last season) drops in coverage.

    Further, Capers ran a lot of single-high safety in the latter stages of last season. Having Dix covering the #2 perimeter corner's back with Shields on the island on every snap makes the defense predictable and exposes the intermediate-to-deep middle to all manner of routes from the other wide out, the slot or the TE.

    While I would expect to see Hayward takes snaps there especially early in the season, but I don't see him as an every down player at cover corner. A lot will depend on down-and-distance and the match-ups.

    The Packers lost their #2 and #3 cover corners, with solid players at the other backfield spots, and then turned around and drafted DBs in the first and second rounds who are perceived as scheme-versatile. That should not be viewed as coincidence. Further, Hayward is a free agent after 2015. You can expect he'll be looking for 3-down money, and he'll likely get at least "starter" nickel money, which is not chump change these days.

    While I wouldn't anoint either Randall or Rollins as a 3-down answer at the perimeter, I think the Packers will be disappointed (as will I) if either of these players (Randall in particular) does not emerge as that guy before the season grows too old, just as Dix solidified free safety as the season wore on.
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page