If we had problems at WR, I'd agree with Mort, but we don't. With our yards-after-catch numbers, we're getting the yards Moss would give us with the deep plays. I don't think Favre is basing his decision on Moss. I'm changing my view on Moss from "no way" to "depends on how much", though. I'm just not sure Moss=Superbowl.
nathaniel said:If we had problems at WR, I'd agree with Mort, but we don't. With our yards-after-catch numbers, we're getting the yards Moss would give us with the deep plays. I don't think Favre is basing his decision on Moss. I'm changing my view on Moss from "no way" to "depends on how much", though. I'm just not sure Moss=Superbowl.
I just found it interesting when Mort said "Favre has made this known."
Reminds me of Duran saying, "No mas!"
To use an Arrow term.. Mort is spitballing it.. just his opinion moreso than any inside knowledge, to me, sometimes these guys, yes even Mort are throwing out guess ala Pro Football Talk..
Just because I think it's cool, I emailed Mike Florio head of PFT today and said thanks for the hard work during day one of free agency. They were writing their arses off. He actually emailed back and said thanks. Thought it was a class act all the way from a guy who was on the Jim Rome show a few hours earlier.
pack_in_black said:Why does it all hinge on the acquisition of Randy?
Really, if Favre's decision is hinging (sp?) on one receiver, when he's already got:
2 Pro Bowl-level guys, and 3 more who are way above average, an above-average defense that's climbing towards Elite status, and a legitimate running game....
if that's the case, then IMO, he can just go ahead and retire. It's not like he's staring another 4-12 season in the face.
My point is that we went 14-4, and were one drive away from one of the most hyped Super Bowl games EVER. If that doesn't keep his competitive juices flowing, then adding a stud WR to an already studly group won't, either, and he shouldn't come back if that's where his head is.
Don't get me wrong, I love reading the sites information, check there a couple times a day and they are right alot more than wrong, but sometimes it seems they are just pissing in the wind on a story. IMO.
Funniest thing I've read in a while!Raider Pride said:Too much of his information is like a beer fart at a Super Bowl Party. It just wafts by gently, it stinks, no one knows where it came from, and no one will admit they were the source.
If I was him, I would be beating down Ted's door for an addition of a all pro caliber guard or two.. IMO.
pack_in_black said:Why does it all hinge on the acquisition of Randy?
Really, if Favre's decision is hinging (sp?) on one receiver, when he's already got:
2 Pro Bowl-level guys, and 3 more who are way above average, an above-average defense that's climbing towards Elite status, and a legitimate running game....
if that's the case, then IMO, he can just go ahead and retire. It's not like he's staring another 4-12 season in the face.
My point is that we went 14-4, and were one drive away from one of the most hyped Super Bowl games EVER. If that doesn't keep his competitive juices flowing, then adding a stud WR to an already studly group won't, either, and he shouldn't come back if that's where his head is.