Anubis
Cheesehead
[url=http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm said:http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm[/url]]
NALL LEAVING MEANS THAT LORD FAVRE ISN'T?
Tom Silverstein of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel suggests that the decision of Packers backup quarterback Craig Nall to sign a three-year deal with the Buffalo Bills could mean that Packers starter Brett Favre is staying put.
Nall, Silverstein writes, is "close friends" with Favre and recently went hunting with him. So if Nall thought that Favre was going to retire, Nall might not have been so eager to find a new home.
But Nall's departure could also be interpreted as a sign that Favre isn't coming back. Since they're close friends, the fact that Favre won't be there is one less reason for Nall to stay.
More importantly, if 2005 first-rounder Aaron Rodgers will be the starter in 2006, the Pack might be inclined to sign a guy with more experience to be the No. 2 -- making them less inclined to make a competitive offer to Nall, who was drafted by a guy who is now long gone.
In other words, no one has the first clue what Favre is or isn't thinking of doing. I wish these guys would try reporting nexs for a change, instead of useless speculation. :roll:
GO PACK!!!
Robert C. Hedley